{ "categories": [ { "name": "Lifecycle Overview", "diagramCount": 4, "diagrams": [ { "id": 1, "title": "PDLC Circular Wheel with Inner Rings", "category": "Lifecycle Overview", "image": "/images/pdlc/01-circular-wheel.png", "tab": 0, "type": "original", "interactiveRegions": 8, "artwork": { "width": 1254, "height": 1254, "regions": [ { "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "summary": "Understand customer problems and identify a valuable opportunity.", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Interview customers and stakeholders", "Synthesize evidence", "Frame the opportunity", "Validate problem assumptions" ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Problem statement", "Research findings", "Initial success measures" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "tasks": [ "Research users", "Frame opportunity", "Validate need" ], "decision": [ "Proceed to Define", "Research further", "Stop opportunity" ], "id": "1-1", "label": "Discover", "phase": 0, "shape": { "type": "annular-sector", "cx": 625, "cy": 674, "innerRadius": 171, "outerRadius": 550, "startAngleDegrees": -109, "endAngleDegrees": -72 }, "provenance": "Normalized phase reference attached to the corresponding original wheel sector." }, { "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "summary": "Translate evidence into a strategy, scope, and measurable product plan.", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Define outcomes and MVP", "Prioritize requirements", "Assess feasibility and ROI", "Align stakeholders" ], "outputs": [ "Product strategy", "Prioritized roadmap", "MVP scope", "Success metrics" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "tasks": [ "Define scope", "Prioritize backlog", "Align investment" ], "decision": [ "Proceed to Design", "Refine scope", "Defer investment" ], "id": "1-2", "label": "Define", "phase": 1, "shape": { "type": "annular-sector", "cx": 625, "cy": 674, "innerRadius": 171, "outerRadius": 550, "startAngleDegrees": -72, "endAngleDegrees": -27 }, "provenance": "Normalized phase reference attached to the corresponding original wheel sector." }, { "question": "How should the solution work?", "summary": "Design usable experiences and technically viable solutions.", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Prototype experiences", "Design integrations", "Test concepts", "Refine acceptance criteria" ], "outputs": [ "UX prototypes", "Technical design", "User stories", "Test scenarios" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "tasks": [ "Prototype", "Review architecture", "Validate usability" ], "decision": [ "Proceed to Build", "Revise design", "Reconsider approach" ], "id": "1-3", "label": "Design", "phase": 2, "shape": { "type": "annular-sector", "cx": 625, "cy": 674, "innerRadius": 171, "outerRadius": 550, "startAngleDegrees": -27, "endAngleDegrees": 20 }, "provenance": "Normalized phase reference attached to the corresponding original wheel sector." }, { "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "summary": "Implement, integrate, and iteratively review working software.", "inputs": [ "Approved designs", "Prioritized backlog", "API contracts", "Acceptance criteria" ], "actions": [ "Build and integrate features", "Review increments", "Resolve trade-offs", "Instrument analytics" ], "outputs": [ "Working increments", "Source code", "Integrated services", "Updated documentation" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "tasks": [ "Implement", "Integrate", "Review increments" ], "decision": [ "Proceed to Validate", "Fix defects", "Replan scope" ], "id": "1-4", "label": "Build", "phase": 3, "shape": { "type": "annular-sector", "cx": 625, "cy": 674, "innerRadius": 171, "outerRadius": 550, "startAngleDegrees": 20, "endAngleDegrees": 70 }, "provenance": "Normalized phase reference attached to the corresponding original wheel sector." }, { "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "summary": "Verify functionality, usability, security, and release readiness.", "inputs": [ "Release candidate", "Test plan", "Acceptance criteria", "Risk controls" ], "actions": [ "Run QA and UAT", "Validate analytics", "Review security", "Resolve critical defects" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence", "UAT results", "Release readiness", "Remediation list" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "tasks": [ "Test", "Validate", "Accept" ], "decision": [ "Proceed to Launch", "Remediate issues", "Hold release" ], "id": "1-5", "label": "Validate", "phase": 4, "shape": { "type": "annular-sector", "cx": 625, "cy": 674, "innerRadius": 171, "outerRadius": 550, "startAngleDegrees": 70, "endAngleDegrees": 110 }, "provenance": "Normalized phase reference attached to the corresponding original wheel sector." }, { "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "summary": "Release the product, activate go-to-market teams, and monitor early use.", "inputs": [ "Approved release", "Launch plan", "Training materials", "Operational runbooks" ], "actions": [ "Coordinate rollout", "Enable sales and support", "Monitor incidents", "Measure activation" ], "outputs": [ "Production release", "Release notes", "Launch communications", "Early adoption dashboard" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "tasks": [ "Deploy", "Enable customers", "Monitor launch" ], "decision": [ "Expand rollout", "Stabilize release", "Rollback if needed" ], "id": "1-6", "label": "Launch", "phase": 5, "shape": { "type": "annular-sector", "cx": 625, "cy": 674, "innerRadius": 171, "outerRadius": 550, "startAngleDegrees": 110, "endAngleDegrees": 159 }, "provenance": "Normalized phase reference attached to the corresponding original wheel sector." }, { "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "summary": "Use evidence and feedback to optimize product outcomes.", "inputs": [ "Product analytics", "Customer feedback", "Support trends", "Experiment results" ], "actions": [ "Analyze behavior", "Prioritize improvements", "Run experiments", "Update roadmap" ], "outputs": [ "Improvement backlog", "Experiment insights", "Updated roadmap", "Product health review" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "tasks": [ "Analyze", "Experiment", "Optimize" ], "decision": [ "Scale improvements", "Iterate", "Stop low-value work" ], "id": "1-7", "label": "Improve", "phase": 6, "shape": { "type": "annular-sector", "cx": 625, "cy": 674, "innerRadius": 171, "outerRadius": 550, "startAngleDegrees": 159, "endAngleDegrees": 205 }, "provenance": "Normalized phase reference attached to the corresponding original wheel sector." }, { "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "summary": "Manage reliability, expansion, economics, and eventual retirement decisions.", "inputs": [ "Growth signals", "Service health", "Unit economics", "Technical debt" ], "actions": [ "Plan capacity", "Optimize reliability", "Expand markets", "Review lifecycle investments" ], "outputs": [ "Scale roadmap", "Capacity plan", "Sustainability review", "Retirement plan if needed" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "tasks": [ "Scale", "Maintain", "Reinvest" ], "decision": [ "Invest in growth", "Maintain", "Modernize or sunset" ], "id": "1-8", "label": "Scale / Maintain", "phase": 7, "shape": { "type": "annular-sector", "cx": 625, "cy": 674, "innerRadius": 171, "outerRadius": 550, "startAngleDegrees": 205, "endAngleDegrees": 251 }, "provenance": "Normalized phase reference attached to the corresponding original wheel sector." } ] }, "navigationLabel": "Circular Wheel" }, { "id": 2, "title": "Product Development Lifecycle", "category": "Lifecycle Overview", "image": "/images/pdlc/02-simplified-phases.png", "tab": 1, "type": "original", "interactiveRegions": 16, "artwork": { "width": 1491, "height": 1055, "regions": [ { "label": "Discover", "phase": 0, "box": [ 1.5, 17, 11.8, 65.5 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Interview customers and stakeholders", "Synthesize evidence", "Frame the opportunity", "Validate problem assumptions" ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Problem statement", "Research findings", "Initial success measures" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "2-1" }, { "label": "Define", "phase": 1, "box": [ 13.6, 17, 11.8, 65.5 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Define outcomes and MVP", "Prioritize requirements", "Assess feasibility and ROI", "Align stakeholders" ], "outputs": [ "Product strategy", "Prioritized roadmap", "MVP scope", "Success metrics" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "2-2" }, { "label": "Design", "phase": 2, "box": [ 25.7, 17, 11.8, 65.5 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Prototype experiences", "Design integrations", "Test concepts", "Refine acceptance criteria" ], "outputs": [ "UX prototypes", "Technical design", "User stories", "Test scenarios" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "2-3" }, { "label": "Build", "phase": 3, "box": [ 37.8, 17, 11.8, 65.5 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Approved designs", "Prioritized backlog", "API contracts", "Acceptance criteria" ], "actions": [ "Build and integrate features", "Review increments", "Resolve trade-offs", "Instrument analytics" ], "outputs": [ "Working increments", "Source code", "Integrated services", "Updated documentation" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "2-4" }, { "label": "Validate", "phase": 4, "box": [ 49.9, 17, 11.8, 65.5 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Release candidate", "Test plan", "Acceptance criteria", "Risk controls" ], "actions": [ "Run QA and UAT", "Validate analytics", "Review security", "Resolve critical defects" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence", "UAT results", "Release readiness", "Remediation list" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "2-5" }, { "label": "Launch", "phase": 5, "box": [ 62.0, 17, 11.8, 65.5 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Approved release", "Launch plan", "Training materials", "Operational runbooks" ], "actions": [ "Coordinate rollout", "Enable sales and support", "Monitor incidents", "Measure activation" ], "outputs": [ "Production release", "Release notes", "Launch communications", "Early adoption dashboard" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "2-6" }, { "label": "Improve", "phase": 6, "box": [ 74.1, 17, 11.8, 65.5 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Product analytics", "Customer feedback", "Support trends", "Experiment results" ], "actions": [ "Analyze behavior", "Prioritize improvements", "Run experiments", "Update roadmap" ], "outputs": [ "Improvement backlog", "Experiment insights", "Updated roadmap", "Product health review" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "2-7" }, { "label": "Scale / Maintain", "phase": 7, "box": [ 86.2, 17, 11.8, 65.5 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Growth signals", "Service health", "Unit economics", "Technical debt" ], "actions": [ "Plan capacity", "Optimize reliability", "Expand markets", "Review lifecycle investments" ], "outputs": [ "Scale roadmap", "Capacity plan", "Sustainability review", "Retirement plan if needed" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "2-8" }, { "label": "Discover · sequence", "phase": 0, "box": [ 19.0, 85, 9.45, 12 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Interview customers and stakeholders", "Synthesize evidence", "Frame the opportunity", "Validate problem assumptions" ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Problem statement", "Research findings", "Initial success measures" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "2-9" }, { "label": "Define · sequence", "phase": 1, "box": [ 28.75, 85, 9.45, 12 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Define outcomes and MVP", "Prioritize requirements", "Assess feasibility and ROI", "Align stakeholders" ], "outputs": [ "Product strategy", "Prioritized roadmap", "MVP scope", "Success metrics" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "2-10" }, { "label": "Design · sequence", "phase": 2, "box": [ 38.5, 85, 9.45, 12 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Prototype experiences", "Design integrations", "Test concepts", "Refine acceptance criteria" ], "outputs": [ "UX prototypes", "Technical design", "User stories", "Test scenarios" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "2-11" }, { "label": "Build · sequence", "phase": 3, "box": [ 48.25, 85, 9.45, 12 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Approved designs", "Prioritized backlog", "API contracts", "Acceptance criteria" ], "actions": [ "Build and integrate features", "Review increments", "Resolve trade-offs", "Instrument analytics" ], "outputs": [ "Working increments", "Source code", "Integrated services", "Updated documentation" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "2-12" }, { "label": "Validate · sequence", "phase": 4, "box": [ 58.0, 85, 9.45, 12 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Release candidate", "Test plan", "Acceptance criteria", "Risk controls" ], "actions": [ "Run QA and UAT", "Validate analytics", "Review security", "Resolve critical defects" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence", "UAT results", "Release readiness", "Remediation list" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "2-13" }, { "label": "Launch · sequence", "phase": 5, "box": [ 67.75, 85, 9.45, 12 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Approved release", "Launch plan", "Training materials", "Operational runbooks" ], "actions": [ "Coordinate rollout", "Enable sales and support", "Monitor incidents", "Measure activation" ], "outputs": [ "Production release", "Release notes", "Launch communications", "Early adoption dashboard" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "2-14" }, { "label": "Improve · sequence", "phase": 6, "box": [ 77.5, 85, 9.45, 12 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Product analytics", "Customer feedback", "Support trends", "Experiment results" ], "actions": [ "Analyze behavior", "Prioritize improvements", "Run experiments", "Update roadmap" ], "outputs": [ "Improvement backlog", "Experiment insights", "Updated roadmap", "Product health review" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "2-15" }, { "label": "Scale / Maintain · sequence", "phase": 7, "box": [ 87.25, 85, 9.45, 12 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Growth signals", "Service health", "Unit economics", "Technical debt" ], "actions": [ "Plan capacity", "Optimize reliability", "Expand markets", "Review lifecycle investments" ], "outputs": [ "Scale roadmap", "Capacity plan", "Sustainability review", "Retirement plan if needed" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "2-16" } ] }, "navigationLabel": "PDLC Phases" }, { "id": 3, "title": "SaaS Product Development Lifecycle", "category": "Lifecycle Overview", "image": "/images/pdlc/03-saas-lifecycle.png", "tab": 1, "type": "original", "interactiveRegions": 24, "artwork": { "width": 1492, "height": 1054, "regions": [ { "label": "Idea", "phase": 0, "box": [ 0.8042895442359249, 13, 6.90348525469169, 58.2 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Interview customers and stakeholders", "Synthesize evidence", "Frame the opportunity", "Validate problem assumptions" ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Problem statement", "Research findings", "Initial success measures" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "3-1" }, { "label": "Research", "phase": 0, "box": [ 7.7077747989276135, 13, 7.439678284182305, 58.2 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Interview customers and stakeholders", "Synthesize evidence", "Frame the opportunity", "Validate problem assumptions" ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Problem statement", "Research findings", "Initial success measures" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "3-2" }, { "label": "Validation", "phase": 0, "box": [ 15.14745308310992, 13, 5.96514745308311, 58.2 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Interview customers and stakeholders", "Synthesize evidence", "Frame the opportunity", "Validate problem assumptions" ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Problem statement", "Research findings", "Initial success measures" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "3-3" }, { "label": "Strategy", "phase": 1, "box": [ 21.11260053619303, 13, 5.697050938337802, 58.2 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Define outcomes and MVP", "Prioritize requirements", "Assess feasibility and ROI", "Align stakeholders" ], "outputs": [ "Product strategy", "Prioritized roadmap", "MVP scope", "Success metrics" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "3-4" }, { "label": "MVP Scope", "phase": 1, "box": [ 26.80965147453083, 13, 5.831099195710456, 58.2 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Define outcomes and MVP", "Prioritize requirements", "Assess feasibility and ROI", "Align stakeholders" ], "outputs": [ "Product strategy", "Prioritized roadmap", "MVP scope", "Success metrics" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "3-5" }, { "label": "Requirements", "phase": 2, "box": [ 32.64075067024129, 13, 6.568364611260054, 58.2 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Prototype experiences", "Design integrations", "Test concepts", "Refine acceptance criteria" ], "outputs": [ "UX prototypes", "Technical design", "User stories", "Test scenarios" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "3-6" }, { "label": "Design", "phase": 2, "box": [ 39.20911528150134, 13, 5.898123324396782, 58.2 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Prototype experiences", "Design integrations", "Test concepts", "Refine acceptance criteria" ], "outputs": [ "UX prototypes", "Technical design", "User stories", "Test scenarios" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "3-7" }, { "label": "Architecture", "phase": 2, "box": [ 45.107238605898125, 13, 6.032171581769437, 58.2 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Prototype experiences", "Design integrations", "Test concepts", "Refine acceptance criteria" ], "outputs": [ "UX prototypes", "Technical design", "User stories", "Test scenarios" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "3-8" }, { "label": "Build", "phase": 3, "box": [ 51.13941018766756, 13, 5.697050938337802, 58.2 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Approved designs", "Prioritized backlog", "API contracts", "Acceptance criteria" ], "actions": [ "Build and integrate features", "Review increments", "Resolve trade-offs", "Instrument analytics" ], "outputs": [ "Working increments", "Source code", "Integrated services", "Updated documentation" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "3-9" }, { "label": "Test", "phase": 4, "box": [ 56.83646112600537, 13, 6.166219839142091, 58.2 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Release candidate", "Test plan", "Acceptance criteria", "Risk controls" ], "actions": [ "Run QA and UAT", "Validate analytics", "Review security", "Resolve critical defects" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence", "UAT results", "Release readiness", "Remediation list" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "3-10" }, { "label": "UAT", "phase": 4, "box": [ 63.00268096514745, 13, 6.970509383378016, 58.2 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Release candidate", "Test plan", "Acceptance criteria", "Risk controls" ], "actions": [ "Run QA and UAT", "Validate analytics", "Review security", "Resolve critical defects" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence", "UAT results", "Release readiness", "Remediation list" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "3-11" }, { "label": "Launch", "phase": 5, "box": [ 69.97319034852548, 13, 6.501340482573727, 58.2 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Approved release", "Launch plan", "Training materials", "Operational runbooks" ], "actions": [ "Coordinate rollout", "Enable sales and support", "Monitor incidents", "Measure activation" ], "outputs": [ "Production release", "Release notes", "Launch communications", "Early adoption dashboard" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "3-12" }, { "label": "Feedback", "phase": 6, "box": [ 76.4745308310992, 13, 5.630026809651475, 58.2 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Product analytics", "Customer feedback", "Support trends", "Experiment results" ], "actions": [ "Analyze behavior", "Prioritize improvements", "Run experiments", "Update roadmap" ], "outputs": [ "Improvement backlog", "Experiment insights", "Updated roadmap", "Product health review" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "3-13" }, { "label": "Optimize", "phase": 6, "box": [ 82.10455764075067, 13, 5.697050938337802, 58.2 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Product analytics", "Customer feedback", "Support trends", "Experiment results" ], "actions": [ "Analyze behavior", "Prioritize improvements", "Run experiments", "Update roadmap" ], "outputs": [ "Improvement backlog", "Experiment insights", "Updated roadmap", "Product health review" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "3-14" }, { "label": "Scale", "phase": 7, "box": [ 87.80160857908848, 13, 5.898123324396782, 58.2 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Growth signals", "Service health", "Unit economics", "Technical debt" ], "actions": [ "Plan capacity", "Optimize reliability", "Expand markets", "Review lifecycle investments" ], "outputs": [ "Scale roadmap", "Capacity plan", "Sustainability review", "Retirement plan if needed" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "3-15" }, { "label": "Maintain", "phase": 7, "box": [ 93.69973190348524, 13, 5.495978552278821, 58.2 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Growth signals", "Service health", "Unit economics", "Technical debt" ], "actions": [ "Plan capacity", "Optimize reliability", "Expand markets", "Review lifecycle investments" ], "outputs": [ "Scale roadmap", "Capacity plan", "Sustainability review", "Retirement plan if needed" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "3-16" }, { "label": "Discover", "phase": 0, "box": [ 0.8, 72.4, 12.0, 10.099999999999994 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Interview customers and stakeholders", "Synthesize evidence", "Frame the opportunity", "Validate problem assumptions" ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Problem statement", "Research findings", "Initial success measures" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "3-17" }, { "label": "Define", "phase": 1, "box": [ 13.1, 72.4, 12.0, 10.099999999999994 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Define outcomes and MVP", "Prioritize requirements", "Assess feasibility and ROI", "Align stakeholders" ], "outputs": [ "Product strategy", "Prioritized roadmap", "MVP scope", "Success metrics" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "3-18" }, { "label": "Design & Plan", "phase": 2, "box": [ 25.4, 72.4, 12.0, 10.099999999999994 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Prototype experiences", "Design integrations", "Test concepts", "Refine acceptance criteria" ], "outputs": [ "UX prototypes", "Technical design", "User stories", "Test scenarios" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "3-19" }, { "label": "Build", "phase": 3, "box": [ 37.7, 72.4, 12.0, 10.099999999999994 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Approved designs", "Prioritized backlog", "API contracts", "Acceptance criteria" ], "actions": [ "Build and integrate features", "Review increments", "Resolve trade-offs", "Instrument analytics" ], "outputs": [ "Working increments", "Source code", "Integrated services", "Updated documentation" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "3-20" }, { "label": "Validate", "phase": 4, "box": [ 50.0, 72.4, 12.0, 10.099999999999994 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Release candidate", "Test plan", "Acceptance criteria", "Risk controls" ], "actions": [ "Run QA and UAT", "Validate analytics", "Review security", "Resolve critical defects" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence", "UAT results", "Release readiness", "Remediation list" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "3-21" }, { "label": "Launch", "phase": 5, "box": [ 62.3, 72.4, 12.0, 10.099999999999994 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Approved release", "Launch plan", "Training materials", "Operational runbooks" ], "actions": [ "Coordinate rollout", "Enable sales and support", "Monitor incidents", "Measure activation" ], "outputs": [ "Production release", "Release notes", "Launch communications", "Early adoption dashboard" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "3-22" }, { "label": "Improve & Scale", "phase": 6, "box": [ 74.6, 72.4, 12.0, 10.099999999999994 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Product analytics", "Customer feedback", "Support trends", "Experiment results" ], "actions": [ "Analyze behavior", "Prioritize improvements", "Run experiments", "Update roadmap" ], "outputs": [ "Improvement backlog", "Experiment insights", "Updated roadmap", "Product health review" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "3-23" }, { "label": "Maintain", "phase": 7, "box": [ 86.9, 72.4, 12.0, 10.099999999999994 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Growth signals", "Service health", "Unit economics", "Technical debt" ], "actions": [ "Plan capacity", "Optimize reliability", "Expand markets", "Review lifecycle investments" ], "outputs": [ "Scale roadmap", "Capacity plan", "Sustainability review", "Retirement plan if needed" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "3-24" } ] }, "navigationLabel": "SaaS Lifecycle" }, { "id": 4, "title": "Product Development Lifecycle — Simple Flow", "category": "Lifecycle Overview", "image": "/images/pdlc/04-simple-flow.png", "tab": 1, "type": "original", "interactiveRegions": 21, "artwork": { "width": 1055, "height": 1491, "regions": [ { "label": "Idea / Opportunity", "phase": 0, "box": [ 14.2, 9.2, 19.2, 9.400000000000002 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Interview customers and stakeholders", "Synthesize evidence", "Frame the opportunity", "Validate problem assumptions" ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Problem statement", "Research findings", "Initial success measures" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "4-1" }, { "label": "Market Research", "phase": 0, "box": [ 35.2, 9.2, 18.2, 9.400000000000002 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Interview customers and stakeholders", "Synthesize evidence", "Frame the opportunity", "Validate problem assumptions" ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Problem statement", "Research findings", "Initial success measures" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "4-2" }, { "label": "Customer Discovery", "phase": 0, "box": [ 56.8, 9.2, 18.2, 9.400000000000002 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Interview customers and stakeholders", "Synthesize evidence", "Frame the opportunity", "Validate problem assumptions" ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Problem statement", "Research findings", "Initial success measures" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "4-3" }, { "label": "Problem Validation", "phase": 0, "box": [ 77.3, 9.2, 18.2, 9.400000000000002 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Interview customers and stakeholders", "Synthesize evidence", "Frame the opportunity", "Validate problem assumptions" ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Problem statement", "Research findings", "Initial success measures" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "4-4" }, { "label": "Product Strategy", "phase": 1, "box": [ 14.2, 20.3, 19.2, 9.399999999999999 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Define outcomes and MVP", "Prioritize requirements", "Assess feasibility and ROI", "Align stakeholders" ], "outputs": [ "Product strategy", "Prioritized roadmap", "MVP scope", "Success metrics" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "4-5" }, { "label": "Solution Definition", "phase": 1, "box": [ 35.2, 20.3, 18.2, 9.399999999999999 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Define outcomes and MVP", "Prioritize requirements", "Assess feasibility and ROI", "Align stakeholders" ], "outputs": [ "Product strategy", "Prioritized roadmap", "MVP scope", "Success metrics" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "4-6" }, { "label": "Feasibility Analysis", "phase": 1, "box": [ 56.8, 20.3, 18.2, 9.399999999999999 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Define outcomes and MVP", "Prioritize requirements", "Assess feasibility and ROI", "Align stakeholders" ], "outputs": [ "Product strategy", "Prioritized roadmap", "MVP scope", "Success metrics" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "4-7" }, { "label": "MVP Scope", "phase": 1, "box": [ 77.3, 20.3, 18.2, 9.399999999999999 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Define outcomes and MVP", "Prioritize requirements", "Assess feasibility and ROI", "Align stakeholders" ], "outputs": [ "Product strategy", "Prioritized roadmap", "MVP scope", "Success metrics" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "4-8" }, { "label": "Requirements Definition", "phase": 2, "box": [ 14.2, 31.4, 21.5, 9.600000000000001 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Prototype experiences", "Design integrations", "Test concepts", "Refine acceptance criteria" ], "outputs": [ "UX prototypes", "Technical design", "User stories", "Test scenarios" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "4-9" }, { "label": "UX/UI Design", "phase": 2, "box": [ 40, 31.4, 22.2, 9.600000000000001 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Prototype experiences", "Design integrations", "Test concepts", "Refine acceptance criteria" ], "outputs": [ "UX prototypes", "Technical design", "User stories", "Test scenarios" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "4-10" }, { "label": "Architecture & Technical Planning", "phase": 2, "box": [ 65, 31.4, 23.2, 9.600000000000001 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Prototype experiences", "Design integrations", "Test concepts", "Refine acceptance criteria" ], "outputs": [ "UX prototypes", "Technical design", "User stories", "Test scenarios" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "4-11" }, { "label": "Development / Build", "phase": 3, "box": [ 14.2, 42.4, 21.5, 9.399999999999999 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Approved designs", "Prioritized backlog", "API contracts", "Acceptance criteria" ], "actions": [ "Build and integrate features", "Review increments", "Resolve trade-offs", "Instrument analytics" ], "outputs": [ "Working increments", "Source code", "Integrated services", "Updated documentation" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "4-12" }, { "label": "Testing & QA", "phase": 4, "box": [ 40, 42.4, 22.2, 9.399999999999999 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Release candidate", "Test plan", "Acceptance criteria", "Risk controls" ], "actions": [ "Run QA and UAT", "Validate analytics", "Review security", "Resolve critical defects" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence", "UAT results", "Release readiness", "Remediation list" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "4-13" }, { "label": "UAT / Business Validation", "phase": 4, "box": [ 65, 42.4, 23.2, 9.399999999999999 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Release candidate", "Test plan", "Acceptance criteria", "Risk controls" ], "actions": [ "Run QA and UAT", "Validate analytics", "Review security", "Resolve critical defects" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence", "UAT results", "Release readiness", "Remediation list" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "4-14" }, { "label": "Launch / Release", "phase": 5, "box": [ 14.2, 53.4, 21.5, 8.399999999999999 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Approved release", "Launch plan", "Training materials", "Operational runbooks" ], "actions": [ "Coordinate rollout", "Enable sales and support", "Monitor incidents", "Measure activation" ], "outputs": [ "Production release", "Release notes", "Launch communications", "Early adoption dashboard" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "4-15" }, { "label": "Adoption & Feedback", "phase": 6, "box": [ 38.8, 53.4, 21, 8.399999999999999 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Product analytics", "Customer feedback", "Support trends", "Experiment results" ], "actions": [ "Analyze behavior", "Prioritize improvements", "Run experiments", "Update roadmap" ], "outputs": [ "Improvement backlog", "Experiment insights", "Updated roadmap", "Product health review" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "4-16" }, { "label": "Measurement & Optimization", "phase": 6, "box": [ 64.5, 53.4, 23.2, 8.399999999999999 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Product analytics", "Customer feedback", "Support trends", "Experiment results" ], "actions": [ "Analyze behavior", "Prioritize improvements", "Run experiments", "Update roadmap" ], "outputs": [ "Improvement backlog", "Experiment insights", "Updated roadmap", "Product health review" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "4-17" }, { "label": "Iteration / Continuous Improvement", "phase": 6, "box": [ 14.2, 63.8, 31.5, 8.0 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Product analytics", "Customer feedback", "Support trends", "Experiment results" ], "actions": [ "Analyze behavior", "Prioritize improvements", "Run experiments", "Update roadmap" ], "outputs": [ "Improvement backlog", "Experiment insights", "Updated roadmap", "Product health review" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "4-18" }, { "label": "Scale / Growth", "phase": 7, "box": [ 51, 63.8, 32, 8.0 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Growth signals", "Service health", "Unit economics", "Technical debt" ], "actions": [ "Plan capacity", "Optimize reliability", "Expand markets", "Review lifecycle investments" ], "outputs": [ "Scale roadmap", "Capacity plan", "Sustainability review", "Retirement plan if needed" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "4-19" }, { "label": "Maintenance / Support", "phase": 7, "box": [ 19.5, 73.8, 60, 8.6 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Growth signals", "Service health", "Unit economics", "Technical debt" ], "actions": [ "Plan capacity", "Optimize reliability", "Expand markets", "Review lifecycle investments" ], "outputs": [ "Scale roadmap", "Capacity plan", "Sustainability review", "Retirement plan if needed" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "4-20" }, { "label": "Retirement / Replacement", "phase": 7, "box": [ 19.5, 84.3, 37, 7.2 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Growth signals", "Service health", "Unit economics", "Technical debt" ], "actions": [ "Plan capacity", "Optimize reliability", "Expand markets", "Review lifecycle investments" ], "outputs": [ "Scale roadmap", "Capacity plan", "Sustainability review", "Retirement plan if needed" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "4-21" } ] }, "navigationLabel": "Simple Flow" } ] }, { "name": "Responsibilities & Deliverables", "diagramCount": 5, "diagrams": [ { "id": 5, "title": "Product Development Lifecycle — Inputs and Outputs", "category": "Responsibilities & Deliverables", "image": "/images/pdlc/05-inputs-outputs.png", "tab": 2, "type": "original", "interactiveRegions": 15, "artwork": { "width": 1491, "height": 1055, "regions": [ { "label": "Idea / Opportunity", "phase": 0, "box": [ 1.4, 17.3, 15.3, 22.8 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Founder vision", "Market gap", "Customer complaint" ], "actions": [ "Interview customers and stakeholders", "Synthesize evidence", "Frame the opportunity", "Validate problem assumptions" ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity statement", "Product idea" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Inputs and outputs transcribed from this artwork; question, actions, gate and measures use the normalized reference.", "id": "5-1" }, { "label": "Market Research & Discovery", "phase": 0, "box": [ 17.9, 17.3, 15.3, 22.8 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Market data", "Trends", "Competitor information", "User interviews" ], "actions": [ "Interview customers and stakeholders", "Synthesize evidence", "Frame the opportunity", "Validate problem assumptions" ], "outputs": [ "Market research report", "Personas and pain points" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Inputs and outputs transcribed from this artwork; question, actions, gate and measures use the normalized reference.", "id": "5-2" }, { "label": "Problem Validation", "phase": 0, "box": [ 34.4, 17.3, 15.3, 22.8 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Research findings", "User feedback", "Willingness to pay" ], "actions": [ "Interview customers and stakeholders", "Synthesize evidence", "Frame the opportunity", "Validate problem assumptions" ], "outputs": [ "Validated problem", "Target segment" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Inputs and outputs transcribed from this artwork; question, actions, gate and measures use the normalized reference.", "id": "5-3" }, { "label": "Product Strategy", "phase": 1, "box": [ 50.9, 17.3, 15.3, 22.8 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Business goals", "Validated problem", "Market context" ], "actions": [ "Define outcomes and MVP", "Prioritize requirements", "Assess feasibility and ROI", "Align stakeholders" ], "outputs": [ "Product vision", "Goals, KPIs and roadmap" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Inputs and outputs transcribed from this artwork; question, actions, gate and measures use the normalized reference.", "id": "5-4" }, { "label": "Solution Definition", "phase": 1, "box": [ 67.4, 17.3, 15.3, 22.8 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "User needs", "Strategy", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Define outcomes and MVP", "Prioritize requirements", "Assess feasibility and ROI", "Align stakeholders" ], "outputs": [ "Solution concept", "Feature themes and value proposition" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Inputs and outputs transcribed from this artwork; question, actions, gate and measures use the normalized reference.", "id": "5-5" }, { "label": "Feasibility Analysis", "phase": 1, "box": [ 83.9, 17.3, 15.3, 22.8 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Technical constraints", "Cost and risk", "Compliance needs" ], "actions": [ "Define outcomes and MVP", "Prioritize requirements", "Assess feasibility and ROI", "Align stakeholders" ], "outputs": [ "Feasibility report", "Build recommendation", "Risk list" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Inputs and outputs transcribed from this artwork; question, actions, gate and measures use the normalized reference.", "id": "5-6" }, { "label": "MVP Scope", "phase": 1, "box": [ 1.4, 41.400000000000006, 15.3, 22.8 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Strategy", "Solution options", "Prioritization decisions" ], "actions": [ "Define outcomes and MVP", "Prioritize requirements", "Assess feasibility and ROI", "Align stakeholders" ], "outputs": [ "MVP backlog", "Release boundary" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Inputs and outputs transcribed from this artwork; question, actions, gate and measures use the normalized reference.", "id": "5-7" }, { "label": "Requirements Definition", "phase": 2, "box": [ 17.9, 41.400000000000006, 15.3, 22.8 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "MVP scope", "Workflows", "User needs" ], "actions": [ "Prototype experiences", "Design integrations", "Test concepts", "Refine acceptance criteria" ], "outputs": [ "PRD", "Epics, user stories and acceptance criteria" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Inputs and outputs transcribed from this artwork; question, actions, gate and measures use the normalized reference.", "id": "5-8" }, { "label": "UX/UI Design", "phase": 2, "box": [ 34.4, 41.400000000000006, 15.3, 22.8 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Requirements", "Personas", "Brand and workflows" ], "actions": [ "Prototype experiences", "Design integrations", "Test concepts", "Refine acceptance criteria" ], "outputs": [ "Wireframes", "Prototype", "UI screens" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Inputs and outputs transcribed from this artwork; question, actions, gate and measures use the normalized reference.", "id": "5-9" }, { "label": "Architecture & Technical Planning", "phase": 2, "box": [ 50.9, 41.400000000000006, 15.3, 22.8 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Requirements", "Non-functional needs", "Integration and security needs" ], "actions": [ "Prototype experiences", "Design integrations", "Test concepts", "Refine acceptance criteria" ], "outputs": [ "Architecture diagram", "API plan", "Database design" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Inputs and outputs transcribed from this artwork; question, actions, gate and measures use the normalized reference.", "id": "5-10" }, { "label": "Development / Build", "phase": 3, "box": [ 67.4, 41.400000000000006, 15.3, 22.8 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Stories", "Designs", "Architecture" ], "actions": [ "Build and integrate features", "Review increments", "Resolve trade-offs", "Instrument analytics" ], "outputs": [ "Working features", "Code, APIs and builds" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Inputs and outputs transcribed from this artwork; question, actions, gate and measures use the normalized reference.", "id": "5-11" }, { "label": "Testing & UAT", "phase": 4, "box": [ 83.9, 41.400000000000006, 15.3, 22.8 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Build", "Test cases", "Business scenarios" ], "actions": [ "Run QA and UAT", "Validate analytics", "Review security", "Resolve critical defects" ], "outputs": [ "Bug reports", "QA sign-off", "UAT approval" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Inputs and outputs transcribed from this artwork; question, actions, gate and measures use the normalized reference.", "id": "5-12" }, { "label": "Launch / Release", "phase": 5, "box": [ 1.4, 65.3, 21.9, 15.9 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Release plan", "GTM plan", "Production build" ], "actions": [ "Coordinate rollout", "Enable sales and support", "Monitor incidents", "Measure activation" ], "outputs": [ "Production release", "Release notes", "Onboarding material" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Inputs and outputs transcribed from this artwork; question, actions, gate and measures use the normalized reference.", "id": "5-13" }, { "label": "Feedback & Optimization", "phase": 6, "box": [ 24.2, 65.3, 25.5, 15.9 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Product usage", "Support tickets", "Customer calls and analytics" ], "actions": [ "Analyze behavior", "Prioritize improvements", "Run experiments", "Update roadmap" ], "outputs": [ "Feedback report", "Improvement backlog", "Experiments" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Inputs and outputs transcribed from this artwork; question, actions, gate and measures use the normalized reference.", "id": "5-14" }, { "label": "Scale / Maintenance / Retirement", "phase": 7, "box": [ 50.7, 65.3, 48, 15.9 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Growth goals", "Support needs", "Monitoring data", "Product usage trends" ], "actions": [ "Plan capacity", "Optimize reliability", "Expand markets", "Review lifecycle investments" ], "outputs": [ "Growth roadmap", "Bug fixes", "Support updates", "Sunset plan" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Inputs and outputs transcribed from this artwork; question, actions, gate and measures use the normalized reference.", "id": "5-15" } ] }, "navigationLabel": "Inputs & Outputs" }, { "id": 6, "title": "PDLC Question → PM Action → Deliverable Flow", "category": "Responsibilities & Deliverables", "image": "/images/pdlc/06-pm-action-flow.png", "tab": 2, "type": "original", "interactiveRegions": 32, "artwork": { "width": 1491, "height": 1055, "regions": [ { "label": "Discover · Phase", "phase": 0, "box": [ 1.7, 17.8, 11.7875, 7.199999999999999 ], "question": "What problem are we solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Research users, market and pain points. Validate the opportunity." ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Research report", "Personas", "Pain points" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "6-1" }, { "label": "Define · Phase", "phase": 1, "box": [ 13.7875, 17.8, 11.7875, 7.199999999999999 ], "question": "What should we build and why?", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Define product strategy, roadmap, feasibility and MVP scope." ], "outputs": [ "Product vision", "Roadmap", "Business case", "Success metrics", "MVP scope" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "6-2" }, { "label": "Design · Phase", "phase": 2, "box": [ 25.875, 17.8, 11.7875, 7.199999999999999 ], "question": "How should the product work and feel?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Create requirements, review UX and align with technical architecture." ], "outputs": [ "PRD", "User stories", "Workflows", "Wireframes", "Prototype", "UI screens" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "6-3" }, { "label": "Build · Phase", "phase": 3, "box": [ 37.962500000000006, 17.8, 11.7875, 7.199999999999999 ], "question": "Can we turn the plan into a working product?", "inputs": [ "Approved designs", "Prioritized backlog", "API contracts", "Acceptance criteria" ], "actions": [ "Clarify requirements, manage trade-offs and support engineering delivery." ], "outputs": [ "Working software", "Code", "Integrations", "Technical documentation" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "6-4" }, { "label": "Validate · Phase", "phase": 4, "box": [ 50.050000000000004, 17.8, 11.7875, 7.199999999999999 ], "question": "Does it work correctly and solve the problem?", "inputs": [ "Release candidate", "Test plan", "Acceptance criteria", "Risk controls" ], "actions": [ "Validate acceptance criteria and coordinate QA and UAT." ], "outputs": [ "Test cases", "Bug reports", "QA sign-off", "UAT approval" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "6-5" }, { "label": "Launch · Phase", "phase": 5, "box": [ 62.1375, 17.8, 11.7875, 7.199999999999999 ], "question": "How do we get it into users’ hands?", "inputs": [ "Approved release", "Launch plan", "Training materials", "Operational runbooks" ], "actions": [ "Prepare launch, release notes, onboarding and go-to-market support." ], "outputs": [ "Release notes", "Launch plan", "Training content", "Support guide" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "6-6" }, { "label": "Improve · Phase", "phase": 6, "box": [ 74.22500000000001, 17.8, 11.7875, 7.199999999999999 ], "question": "What should we improve based on learning?", "inputs": [ "Product analytics", "Customer feedback", "Support trends", "Experiment results" ], "actions": [ "Gather feedback, analyze data and prioritize improvements." ], "outputs": [ "Analytics dashboard", "Feedback report", "Improvement backlog" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "6-7" }, { "label": "Scale / Maintain · Phase", "phase": 7, "box": [ 86.3125, 17.8, 11.7875, 7.199999999999999 ], "question": "How do we grow, sustain, or sunset it?", "inputs": [ "Growth signals", "Service health", "Unit economics", "Technical debt" ], "actions": [ "Expand roadmap, monitor product health and manage lifecycle decisions." ], "outputs": [ "Growth roadmap", "Scalability plan", "Monitoring dashboard", "Sunset plan" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "6-8" }, { "label": "Discover · Main question", "phase": 0, "box": [ 1.7, 25, 11.7875, 18.6 ], "question": "What problem are we solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Research users, market and pain points. Validate the opportunity." ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Research report", "Personas", "Pain points" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "6-9" }, { "label": "Define · Main question", "phase": 1, "box": [ 13.7875, 25, 11.7875, 18.6 ], "question": "What should we build and why?", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Define product strategy, roadmap, feasibility and MVP scope." ], "outputs": [ "Product vision", "Roadmap", "Business case", "Success metrics", "MVP scope" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "6-10" }, { "label": "Design · Main question", "phase": 2, "box": [ 25.875, 25, 11.7875, 18.6 ], "question": "How should the product work and feel?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Create requirements, review UX and align with technical architecture." ], "outputs": [ "PRD", "User stories", "Workflows", "Wireframes", "Prototype", "UI screens" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "6-11" }, { "label": "Build · Main question", "phase": 3, "box": [ 37.962500000000006, 25, 11.7875, 18.6 ], "question": "Can we turn the plan into a working product?", "inputs": [ "Approved designs", "Prioritized backlog", "API contracts", "Acceptance criteria" ], "actions": [ "Clarify requirements, manage trade-offs and support engineering delivery." ], "outputs": [ "Working software", "Code", "Integrations", "Technical documentation" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "6-12" }, { "label": "Validate · Main question", "phase": 4, "box": [ 50.050000000000004, 25, 11.7875, 18.6 ], "question": "Does it work correctly and solve the problem?", "inputs": [ "Release candidate", "Test plan", "Acceptance criteria", "Risk controls" ], "actions": [ "Validate acceptance criteria and coordinate QA and UAT." ], "outputs": [ "Test cases", "Bug reports", "QA sign-off", "UAT approval" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "6-13" }, { "label": "Launch · Main question", "phase": 5, "box": [ 62.1375, 25, 11.7875, 18.6 ], "question": "How do we get it into users’ hands?", "inputs": [ "Approved release", "Launch plan", "Training materials", "Operational runbooks" ], "actions": [ "Prepare launch, release notes, onboarding and go-to-market support." ], "outputs": [ "Release notes", "Launch plan", "Training content", "Support guide" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "6-14" }, { "label": "Improve · Main question", "phase": 6, "box": [ 74.22500000000001, 25, 11.7875, 18.6 ], "question": "What should we improve based on learning?", "inputs": [ "Product analytics", "Customer feedback", "Support trends", "Experiment results" ], "actions": [ "Gather feedback, analyze data and prioritize improvements." ], "outputs": [ "Analytics dashboard", "Feedback report", "Improvement backlog" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "6-15" }, { "label": "Scale / Maintain · Main question", "phase": 7, "box": [ 86.3125, 25, 11.7875, 18.6 ], "question": "How do we grow, sustain, or sunset it?", "inputs": [ "Growth signals", "Service health", "Unit economics", "Technical debt" ], "actions": [ "Expand roadmap, monitor product health and manage lifecycle decisions." ], "outputs": [ "Growth roadmap", "Scalability plan", "Monitoring dashboard", "Sunset plan" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "6-16" }, { "label": "Discover · PM responsibility", "phase": 0, "box": [ 1.7, 43.6, 11.7875, 20.4 ], "question": "What problem are we solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Research users, market and pain points. Validate the opportunity." ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Research report", "Personas", "Pain points" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "6-17" }, { "label": "Define · PM responsibility", "phase": 1, "box": [ 13.7875, 43.6, 11.7875, 20.4 ], "question": "What should we build and why?", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Define product strategy, roadmap, feasibility and MVP scope." ], "outputs": [ "Product vision", "Roadmap", "Business case", "Success metrics", "MVP scope" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "6-18" }, { "label": "Design · PM responsibility", "phase": 2, "box": [ 25.875, 43.6, 11.7875, 20.4 ], "question": "How should the product work and feel?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Create requirements, review UX and align with technical architecture." ], "outputs": [ "PRD", "User stories", "Workflows", "Wireframes", "Prototype", "UI screens" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "6-19" }, { "label": "Build · PM responsibility", "phase": 3, "box": [ 37.962500000000006, 43.6, 11.7875, 20.4 ], "question": "Can we turn the plan into a working product?", "inputs": [ "Approved designs", "Prioritized backlog", "API contracts", "Acceptance criteria" ], "actions": [ "Clarify requirements, manage trade-offs and support engineering delivery." ], "outputs": [ "Working software", "Code", "Integrations", "Technical documentation" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "6-20" }, { "label": "Validate · PM responsibility", "phase": 4, "box": [ 50.050000000000004, 43.6, 11.7875, 20.4 ], "question": "Does it work correctly and solve the problem?", "inputs": [ "Release candidate", "Test plan", "Acceptance criteria", "Risk controls" ], "actions": [ "Validate acceptance criteria and coordinate QA and UAT." ], "outputs": [ "Test cases", "Bug reports", "QA sign-off", "UAT approval" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "6-21" }, { "label": "Launch · PM responsibility", "phase": 5, "box": [ 62.1375, 43.6, 11.7875, 20.4 ], "question": "How do we get it into users’ hands?", "inputs": [ "Approved release", "Launch plan", "Training materials", "Operational runbooks" ], "actions": [ "Prepare launch, release notes, onboarding and go-to-market support." ], "outputs": [ "Release notes", "Launch plan", "Training content", "Support guide" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "6-22" }, { "label": "Improve · PM responsibility", "phase": 6, "box": [ 74.22500000000001, 43.6, 11.7875, 20.4 ], "question": "What should we improve based on learning?", "inputs": [ "Product analytics", "Customer feedback", "Support trends", "Experiment results" ], "actions": [ "Gather feedback, analyze data and prioritize improvements." ], "outputs": [ "Analytics dashboard", "Feedback report", "Improvement backlog" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "6-23" }, { "label": "Scale / Maintain · PM responsibility", "phase": 7, "box": [ 86.3125, 43.6, 11.7875, 20.4 ], "question": "How do we grow, sustain, or sunset it?", "inputs": [ "Growth signals", "Service health", "Unit economics", "Technical debt" ], "actions": [ "Expand roadmap, monitor product health and manage lifecycle decisions." ], "outputs": [ "Growth roadmap", "Scalability plan", "Monitoring dashboard", "Sunset plan" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "6-24" }, { "label": "Discover · Key deliverables", "phase": 0, "box": [ 1.7, 64, 11.7875, 22 ], "question": "What problem are we solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Research users, market and pain points. Validate the opportunity." ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Research report", "Personas", "Pain points" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "6-25" }, { "label": "Define · Key deliverables", "phase": 1, "box": [ 13.7875, 64, 11.7875, 22 ], "question": "What should we build and why?", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Define product strategy, roadmap, feasibility and MVP scope." ], "outputs": [ "Product vision", "Roadmap", "Business case", "Success metrics", "MVP scope" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "6-26" }, { "label": "Design · Key deliverables", "phase": 2, "box": [ 25.875, 64, 11.7875, 22 ], "question": "How should the product work and feel?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Create requirements, review UX and align with technical architecture." ], "outputs": [ "PRD", "User stories", "Workflows", "Wireframes", "Prototype", "UI screens" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "6-27" }, { "label": "Build · Key deliverables", "phase": 3, "box": [ 37.962500000000006, 64, 11.7875, 22 ], "question": "Can we turn the plan into a working product?", "inputs": [ "Approved designs", "Prioritized backlog", "API contracts", "Acceptance criteria" ], "actions": [ "Clarify requirements, manage trade-offs and support engineering delivery." ], "outputs": [ "Working software", "Code", "Integrations", "Technical documentation" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "6-28" }, { "label": "Validate · Key deliverables", "phase": 4, "box": [ 50.050000000000004, 64, 11.7875, 22 ], "question": "Does it work correctly and solve the problem?", "inputs": [ "Release candidate", "Test plan", "Acceptance criteria", "Risk controls" ], "actions": [ "Validate acceptance criteria and coordinate QA and UAT." ], "outputs": [ "Test cases", "Bug reports", "QA sign-off", "UAT approval" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "6-29" }, { "label": "Launch · Key deliverables", "phase": 5, "box": [ 62.1375, 64, 11.7875, 22 ], "question": "How do we get it into users’ hands?", "inputs": [ "Approved release", "Launch plan", "Training materials", "Operational runbooks" ], "actions": [ "Prepare launch, release notes, onboarding and go-to-market support." ], "outputs": [ "Release notes", "Launch plan", "Training content", "Support guide" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "6-30" }, { "label": "Improve · Key deliverables", "phase": 6, "box": [ 74.22500000000001, 64, 11.7875, 22 ], "question": "What should we improve based on learning?", "inputs": [ "Product analytics", "Customer feedback", "Support trends", "Experiment results" ], "actions": [ "Gather feedback, analyze data and prioritize improvements." ], "outputs": [ "Analytics dashboard", "Feedback report", "Improvement backlog" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "6-31" }, { "label": "Scale / Maintain · Key deliverables", "phase": 7, "box": [ 86.3125, 64, 11.7875, 22 ], "question": "How do we grow, sustain, or sunset it?", "inputs": [ "Growth signals", "Service health", "Unit economics", "Technical debt" ], "actions": [ "Expand roadmap, monitor product health and manage lifecycle decisions." ], "outputs": [ "Growth roadmap", "Scalability plan", "Monitoring dashboard", "Sunset plan" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "6-32" } ] }, "navigationLabel": "Question → Action → Deliverable" }, { "id": 7, "title": "Product Development Lifecycle — Product Manager Responsibility", "category": "Responsibilities & Deliverables", "image": "/images/pdlc/07-pm-responsibility.png", "tab": 8, "type": "original", "interactiveRegions": 25, "artwork": { "width": 1055, "height": 1491, "regions": [ { "label": "Idea", "phase": 0, "box": [ 15.1, 13.2, 82.6, 3.6 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Understand the business opportunity and frame the problem." ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Problem statement", "Research findings", "Initial success measures" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "PM responsibility transcribed from this artwork; other detail fields use the normalized reference.", "id": "7-1" }, { "label": "Research", "phase": 0, "box": [ 15.1, 16.84, 82.6, 3.6 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Conduct market, competitor, and user research." ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Problem statement", "Research findings", "Initial success measures" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "PM responsibility transcribed from this artwork; other detail fields use the normalized reference.", "id": "7-2" }, { "label": "Validation", "phase": 0, "box": [ 15.1, 20.48, 82.6, 3.6 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Validate the problem, target segment, and user pain." ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Problem statement", "Research findings", "Initial success measures" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "PM responsibility transcribed from this artwork; other detail fields use the normalized reference.", "id": "7-3" }, { "label": "Strategy", "phase": 1, "box": [ 15.1, 24.119999999999997, 82.6, 3.6 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Define product vision, roadmap, goals, and KPIs." ], "outputs": [ "Product strategy", "Prioritized roadmap", "MVP scope", "Success metrics" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "PM responsibility transcribed from this artwork; other detail fields use the normalized reference.", "id": "7-4" }, { "label": "Solution Definition", "phase": 1, "box": [ 15.1, 27.759999999999998, 82.6, 3.6 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Shape the solution direction and value proposition." ], "outputs": [ "Product strategy", "Prioritized roadmap", "MVP scope", "Success metrics" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "PM responsibility transcribed from this artwork; other detail fields use the normalized reference.", "id": "7-5" }, { "label": "Feasibility", "phase": 1, "box": [ 15.1, 31.4, 82.6, 3.6 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Align with engineering, architecture, finance, and compliance." ], "outputs": [ "Product strategy", "Prioritized roadmap", "MVP scope", "Success metrics" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "PM responsibility transcribed from this artwork; other detail fields use the normalized reference.", "id": "7-6" }, { "label": "MVP Scope", "phase": 1, "box": [ 15.1, 35.04, 82.6, 3.6 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Prioritize what must be built now versus later." ], "outputs": [ "Product strategy", "Prioritized roadmap", "MVP scope", "Success metrics" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "PM responsibility transcribed from this artwork; other detail fields use the normalized reference.", "id": "7-7" }, { "label": "Requirements", "phase": 2, "box": [ 15.1, 38.68, 82.6, 3.6 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Create PRD, epics, user stories, and acceptance criteria." ], "outputs": [ "UX prototypes", "Technical design", "User stories", "Test scenarios" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "PM responsibility transcribed from this artwork; other detail fields use the normalized reference.", "id": "7-8" }, { "label": "Design", "phase": 2, "box": [ 15.1, 42.32, 82.6, 3.6 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Review flows, prototypes, usability, and user experience." ], "outputs": [ "UX prototypes", "Technical design", "User stories", "Test scenarios" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "PM responsibility transcribed from this artwork; other detail fields use the normalized reference.", "id": "7-9" }, { "label": "Architecture", "phase": 2, "box": [ 15.1, 45.959999999999994, 82.6, 3.6 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Ensure the technical approach supports product goals." ], "outputs": [ "UX prototypes", "Technical design", "User stories", "Test scenarios" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "PM responsibility transcribed from this artwork; other detail fields use the normalized reference.", "id": "7-10" }, { "label": "Build", "phase": 3, "box": [ 15.1, 49.599999999999994, 82.6, 3.6 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Approved designs", "Prioritized backlog", "API contracts", "Acceptance criteria" ], "actions": [ "Clarify requirements, manage trade-offs, and support engineering." ], "outputs": [ "Working increments", "Source code", "Integrated services", "Updated documentation" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "PM responsibility transcribed from this artwork; other detail fields use the normalized reference.", "id": "7-11" }, { "label": "Testing", "phase": 4, "box": [ 15.1, 53.239999999999995, 82.6, 3.6 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Release candidate", "Test plan", "Acceptance criteria", "Risk controls" ], "actions": [ "Validate the product against acceptance criteria." ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence", "UAT results", "Release readiness", "Remediation list" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "PM responsibility transcribed from this artwork; other detail fields use the normalized reference.", "id": "7-12" }, { "label": "UAT", "phase": 4, "box": [ 15.1, 56.879999999999995, 82.6, 3.6 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Release candidate", "Test plan", "Acceptance criteria", "Risk controls" ], "actions": [ "Coordinate business validation and approval." ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence", "UAT results", "Release readiness", "Remediation list" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "PM responsibility transcribed from this artwork; other detail fields use the normalized reference.", "id": "7-13" }, { "label": "Launch", "phase": 5, "box": [ 15.1, 60.519999999999996, 82.6, 3.6 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Approved release", "Launch plan", "Training materials", "Operational runbooks" ], "actions": [ "Prepare launch plan, release notes, and GTM support." ], "outputs": [ "Production release", "Release notes", "Launch communications", "Early adoption dashboard" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "PM responsibility transcribed from this artwork; other detail fields use the normalized reference.", "id": "7-14" }, { "label": "Feedback", "phase": 6, "box": [ 15.1, 64.16, 82.6, 3.6 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Product analytics", "Customer feedback", "Support trends", "Experiment results" ], "actions": [ "Gather user feedback and adoption signals." ], "outputs": [ "Improvement backlog", "Experiment insights", "Updated roadmap", "Product health review" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "PM responsibility transcribed from this artwork; other detail fields use the normalized reference.", "id": "7-15" }, { "label": "Optimization", "phase": 6, "box": [ 15.1, 67.8, 82.6, 3.6 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Product analytics", "Customer feedback", "Support trends", "Experiment results" ], "actions": [ "Prioritize improvements based on data." ], "outputs": [ "Improvement backlog", "Experiment insights", "Updated roadmap", "Product health review" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "PM responsibility transcribed from this artwork; other detail fields use the normalized reference.", "id": "7-16" }, { "label": "Scale", "phase": 7, "box": [ 15.1, 71.44, 82.6, 3.6 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Growth signals", "Service health", "Unit economics", "Technical debt" ], "actions": [ "Expand roadmap, market, features, and usage." ], "outputs": [ "Scale roadmap", "Capacity plan", "Sustainability review", "Retirement plan if needed" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "PM responsibility transcribed from this artwork; other detail fields use the normalized reference.", "id": "7-17" }, { "label": "Maintenance", "phase": 7, "box": [ 15.1, 75.08, 82.6, 3.6 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Growth signals", "Service health", "Unit economics", "Technical debt" ], "actions": [ "Monitor product health and manage improvements." ], "outputs": [ "Scale roadmap", "Capacity plan", "Sustainability review", "Retirement plan if needed" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "PM responsibility transcribed from this artwork; other detail fields use the normalized reference.", "id": "7-18" }, { "label": "Retirement", "phase": 7, "box": [ 15.1, 78.72, 82.6, 3.6 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Growth signals", "Service health", "Unit economics", "Technical debt" ], "actions": [ "Decide when to sunset features or products." ], "outputs": [ "Scale roadmap", "Capacity plan", "Sustainability review", "Retirement plan if needed" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "PM responsibility transcribed from this artwork; other detail fields use the normalized reference.", "id": "7-19" }, { "label": "Customer Understanding", "phase": 0, "box": [ 3.4, 86.1, 14.8, 5.2 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Interview customers and stakeholders", "Synthesize evidence", "Frame the opportunity", "Validate problem assumptions" ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Problem statement", "Research findings", "Initial success measures" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "7-20" }, { "label": "Prioritization", "phase": 1, "box": [ 19.05, 86.1, 14.8, 5.2 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Define outcomes and MVP", "Prioritize requirements", "Assess feasibility and ROI", "Align stakeholders" ], "outputs": [ "Product strategy", "Prioritized roadmap", "MVP scope", "Success metrics" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "7-21" }, { "label": "Cross-functional Alignment", "phase": 2, "box": [ 34.7, 86.1, 14.8, 5.2 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Prototype experiences", "Design integrations", "Test concepts", "Refine acceptance criteria" ], "outputs": [ "UX prototypes", "Technical design", "User stories", "Test scenarios" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "7-22" }, { "label": "Decision Making", "phase": 1, "box": [ 50.35, 86.1, 14.8, 5.2 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Define outcomes and MVP", "Prioritize requirements", "Assess feasibility and ROI", "Align stakeholders" ], "outputs": [ "Product strategy", "Prioritized roadmap", "MVP scope", "Success metrics" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "7-23" }, { "label": "Delivery Support", "phase": 3, "box": [ 66.0, 86.1, 14.8, 5.2 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Approved designs", "Prioritized backlog", "API contracts", "Acceptance criteria" ], "actions": [ "Build and integrate features", "Review increments", "Resolve trade-offs", "Instrument analytics" ], "outputs": [ "Working increments", "Source code", "Integrated services", "Updated documentation" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "7-24" }, { "label": "Continuous Improvement", "phase": 6, "box": [ 81.65, 86.1, 14.8, 5.2 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Product analytics", "Customer feedback", "Support trends", "Experiment results" ], "actions": [ "Analyze behavior", "Prioritize improvements", "Run experiments", "Update roadmap" ], "outputs": [ "Improvement backlog", "Experiment insights", "Updated roadmap", "Product health review" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "7-25" } ] }, "navigationLabel": "PM Responsibilities" }, { "id": 8, "title": "Product Development Lifecycle — Deliverables by Phase", "category": "Responsibilities & Deliverables", "image": "/images/pdlc/08-deliverables.png", "tab": 1, "type": "original", "interactiveRegions": 19, "artwork": { "width": 1055, "height": 1491, "regions": [ { "label": "Discover", "phase": 0, "box": [ 3.3, 18.4, 93.5, 6.3000000000000025 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Interview customers and stakeholders", "Synthesize evidence", "Frame the opportunity", "Validate problem assumptions" ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Research report", "Personas", "Pain points" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Deliverables transcribed from this artwork; supporting explanation uses the normalized reference.", "id": "8-1" }, { "label": "Define", "phase": 1, "box": [ 3.3, 25.1, 93.5, 6.299999999999999 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Define outcomes and MVP", "Prioritize requirements", "Assess feasibility and ROI", "Align stakeholders" ], "outputs": [ "Product vision", "Roadmap", "Business case", "Success metrics" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Deliverables transcribed from this artwork; supporting explanation uses the normalized reference.", "id": "8-2" }, { "label": "Design", "phase": 2, "box": [ 3.3, 31.8, 93.5, 6.299999999999999 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Prototype experiences", "Design integrations", "Test concepts", "Refine acceptance criteria" ], "outputs": [ "PRD", "User stories", "Workflows", "Wireframes", "Prototype", "UI screens" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Deliverables transcribed from this artwork; supporting explanation uses the normalized reference.", "id": "8-3" }, { "label": "Plan", "phase": 2, "box": [ 3.3, 38.5, 93.5, 6.3000000000000025 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Prototype experiences", "Design integrations", "Test concepts", "Refine acceptance criteria" ], "outputs": [ "Architecture diagram", "API design", "Database model", "Sprint plan" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Deliverables transcribed from this artwork; supporting explanation uses the normalized reference.", "id": "8-4" }, { "label": "Build", "phase": 3, "box": [ 3.3, 45.2, 93.5, 5.899999999999997 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Approved designs", "Prioritized backlog", "API contracts", "Acceptance criteria" ], "actions": [ "Build and integrate features", "Review increments", "Resolve trade-offs", "Instrument analytics" ], "outputs": [ "Working software", "Code", "Integrations", "Technical documentation" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Deliverables transcribed from this artwork; supporting explanation uses the normalized reference.", "id": "8-5" }, { "label": "Validate", "phase": 4, "box": [ 3.3, 51.5, 93.5, 5.499999999999998 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Release candidate", "Test plan", "Acceptance criteria", "Risk controls" ], "actions": [ "Run QA and UAT", "Validate analytics", "Review security", "Resolve critical defects" ], "outputs": [ "Test cases", "Bug reports", "QA sign-off", "UAT approval" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Deliverables transcribed from this artwork; supporting explanation uses the normalized reference.", "id": "8-6" }, { "label": "Launch", "phase": 5, "box": [ 3.3, 57.4, 93.5, 5.6 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Approved release", "Launch plan", "Training materials", "Operational runbooks" ], "actions": [ "Coordinate rollout", "Enable sales and support", "Monitor incidents", "Measure activation" ], "outputs": [ "Release notes", "Launch plan", "Training content", "Support guide" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Deliverables transcribed from this artwork; supporting explanation uses the normalized reference.", "id": "8-7" }, { "label": "Improve", "phase": 6, "box": [ 3.3, 63.4, 93.5, 5.499999999999998 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Product analytics", "Customer feedback", "Support trends", "Experiment results" ], "actions": [ "Analyze behavior", "Prioritize improvements", "Run experiments", "Update roadmap" ], "outputs": [ "Analytics dashboard", "Feedback report", "Improvement backlog" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Deliverables transcribed from this artwork; supporting explanation uses the normalized reference.", "id": "8-8" }, { "label": "Scale", "phase": 7, "box": [ 3.3, 69.3, 93.5, 5.500000000000005 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Growth signals", "Service health", "Unit economics", "Technical debt" ], "actions": [ "Plan capacity", "Optimize reliability", "Expand markets", "Review lifecycle investments" ], "outputs": [ "Growth roadmap", "Scalability plan", "Enterprise readiness plan" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Deliverables transcribed from this artwork; supporting explanation uses the normalized reference.", "id": "8-9" }, { "label": "Maintain", "phase": 7, "box": [ 3.3, 75.2, 93.5, 5.399999999999997 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Growth signals", "Service health", "Unit economics", "Technical debt" ], "actions": [ "Plan capacity", "Optimize reliability", "Expand markets", "Review lifecycle investments" ], "outputs": [ "Support process", "Monitoring dashboard", "Incident log", "Bug backlog" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Deliverables transcribed from this artwork; supporting explanation uses the normalized reference.", "id": "8-10" }, { "label": "Retire", "phase": 7, "box": [ 3.3, 81, 93.5, 5.8 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Growth signals", "Service health", "Unit economics", "Technical debt" ], "actions": [ "Plan capacity", "Optimize reliability", "Expand markets", "Review lifecycle investments" ], "outputs": [ "Sunset plan", "Migration plan", "Customer communication" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Deliverables transcribed from this artwork; supporting explanation uses the normalized reference.", "id": "8-11" }, { "label": "Strategy", "phase": 1, "box": [ 4.5, 90.8, 11.037, 6.400000000000006 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Define outcomes and MVP", "Prioritize requirements", "Assess feasibility and ROI", "Align stakeholders" ], "outputs": [ "Product strategy", "Prioritized roadmap", "MVP scope", "Success metrics" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "8-12" }, { "label": "Research", "phase": 0, "box": [ 15.838, 90.8, 11.037, 6.400000000000006 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Interview customers and stakeholders", "Synthesize evidence", "Frame the opportunity", "Validate problem assumptions" ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Problem statement", "Research findings", "Initial success measures" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "8-13" }, { "label": "Design", "phase": 2, "box": [ 27.175, 90.8, 11.037, 6.400000000000006 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Prototype experiences", "Design integrations", "Test concepts", "Refine acceptance criteria" ], "outputs": [ "UX prototypes", "Technical design", "User stories", "Test scenarios" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "8-14" }, { "label": "Engineering", "phase": 3, "box": [ 38.513, 90.8, 11.037, 6.400000000000006 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Approved designs", "Prioritized backlog", "API contracts", "Acceptance criteria" ], "actions": [ "Build and integrate features", "Review increments", "Resolve trade-offs", "Instrument analytics" ], "outputs": [ "Working increments", "Source code", "Integrated services", "Updated documentation" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "8-15" }, { "label": "Quality", "phase": 4, "box": [ 49.85, 90.8, 11.037, 6.400000000000006 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Release candidate", "Test plan", "Acceptance criteria", "Risk controls" ], "actions": [ "Run QA and UAT", "Validate analytics", "Review security", "Resolve critical defects" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence", "UAT results", "Release readiness", "Remediation list" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "8-16" }, { "label": "Launch", "phase": 5, "box": [ 61.188, 90.8, 11.037, 6.400000000000006 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Approved release", "Launch plan", "Training materials", "Operational runbooks" ], "actions": [ "Coordinate rollout", "Enable sales and support", "Monitor incidents", "Measure activation" ], "outputs": [ "Production release", "Release notes", "Launch communications", "Early adoption dashboard" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "8-17" }, { "label": "Growth", "phase": 6, "box": [ 72.525, 90.8, 11.037, 6.400000000000006 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Product analytics", "Customer feedback", "Support trends", "Experiment results" ], "actions": [ "Analyze behavior", "Prioritize improvements", "Run experiments", "Update roadmap" ], "outputs": [ "Improvement backlog", "Experiment insights", "Updated roadmap", "Product health review" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "8-18" }, { "label": "Operations", "phase": 7, "box": [ 83.862, 90.8, 11.037, 6.400000000000006 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Growth signals", "Service health", "Unit economics", "Technical debt" ], "actions": [ "Plan capacity", "Optimize reliability", "Expand markets", "Review lifecycle investments" ], "outputs": [ "Scale roadmap", "Capacity plan", "Sustainability review", "Retirement plan if needed" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "8-19" } ] }, "navigationLabel": "Deliverables by Phase" }, { "id": 9, "title": "PDLC Swimlane — Phases, PM Responsibilities and Deliverables", "category": "Responsibilities & Deliverables", "image": "/images/pdlc/09-swimlane.png", "tab": 4, "type": "original", "interactiveRegions": 40, "artwork": { "width": 1491, "height": 1055, "regions": [ { "label": "Discover · Phase", "phase": 0, "box": [ 12.7, 9.4, 10.499999999999998, 15.1 ], "question": "What problem are we solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Research users, market and pain points. Validate the opportunity." ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Research report", "Personas", "Pain points" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "9-1" }, { "label": "Define · Phase", "phase": 1, "box": [ 23.5, 9.4, 10.499999999999998, 15.1 ], "question": "What should we build and why?", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Define product strategy, roadmap, feasibility and MVP scope." ], "outputs": [ "Product vision", "Roadmap", "Business case", "Success metrics", "MVP scope" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "9-2" }, { "label": "Design · Phase", "phase": 2, "box": [ 34.3, 9.4, 10.499999999999998, 15.1 ], "question": "How should the product work and feel?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Create requirements, review UX and align with technical architecture." ], "outputs": [ "PRD", "User stories", "Workflows", "Wireframes", "Prototype", "UI screens" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "9-3" }, { "label": "Build · Phase", "phase": 3, "box": [ 45.099999999999994, 9.4, 10.499999999999998, 15.1 ], "question": "Can we turn the plan into a working product?", "inputs": [ "Approved designs", "Prioritized backlog", "API contracts", "Acceptance criteria" ], "actions": [ "Clarify requirements, manage trade-offs and support engineering delivery." ], "outputs": [ "Working software", "Code", "Integrations", "Technical documentation" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "9-4" }, { "label": "Validate · Phase", "phase": 4, "box": [ 55.89999999999999, 9.4, 10.499999999999998, 15.1 ], "question": "Does it work correctly and solve the problem?", "inputs": [ "Release candidate", "Test plan", "Acceptance criteria", "Risk controls" ], "actions": [ "Validate acceptance criteria and coordinate QA and UAT." ], "outputs": [ "Test cases", "Bug reports", "QA sign-off", "UAT approval" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "9-5" }, { "label": "Launch · Phase", "phase": 5, "box": [ 66.69999999999999, 9.4, 10.499999999999998, 15.1 ], "question": "How do we get it into users’ hands?", "inputs": [ "Approved release", "Launch plan", "Training materials", "Operational runbooks" ], "actions": [ "Prepare launch, release notes, onboarding and go-to-market support." ], "outputs": [ "Release notes", "Launch plan", "Training content", "Support guide" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "9-6" }, { "label": "Improve · Phase", "phase": 6, "box": [ 77.5, 9.4, 10.499999999999998, 15.1 ], "question": "What should we improve based on learning?", "inputs": [ "Product analytics", "Customer feedback", "Support trends", "Experiment results" ], "actions": [ "Gather feedback, analyze data and prioritize improvements." ], "outputs": [ "Analytics dashboard", "Feedback report", "Improvement backlog" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "9-7" }, { "label": "Scale / Maintain · Phase", "phase": 7, "box": [ 88.3, 9.4, 10.499999999999998, 15.1 ], "question": "How do we grow, sustain, or sunset it?", "inputs": [ "Growth signals", "Service health", "Unit economics", "Technical debt" ], "actions": [ "Expand roadmap, monitor product health and manage lifecycle decisions." ], "outputs": [ "Growth roadmap", "Scalability plan", "Monitoring dashboard", "Sunset plan" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "9-8" }, { "label": "Discover · Main question", "phase": 0, "box": [ 12.7, 24.8, 10.499999999999998, 14.900000000000002 ], "question": "What problem are we solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Research users, market and pain points. Validate the opportunity." ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Research report", "Personas", "Pain points" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "9-9" }, { "label": "Define · Main question", "phase": 1, "box": [ 23.5, 24.8, 10.499999999999998, 14.900000000000002 ], "question": "What should we build and why?", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Define product strategy, roadmap, feasibility and MVP scope." ], "outputs": [ "Product vision", "Roadmap", "Business case", "Success metrics", "MVP scope" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "9-10" }, { "label": "Design · Main question", "phase": 2, "box": [ 34.3, 24.8, 10.499999999999998, 14.900000000000002 ], "question": "How should the product work and feel?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Create requirements, review UX and align with technical architecture." ], "outputs": [ "PRD", "User stories", "Workflows", "Wireframes", "Prototype", "UI screens" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "9-11" }, { "label": "Build · Main question", "phase": 3, "box": [ 45.099999999999994, 24.8, 10.499999999999998, 14.900000000000002 ], "question": "Can we turn the plan into a working product?", "inputs": [ "Approved designs", "Prioritized backlog", "API contracts", "Acceptance criteria" ], "actions": [ "Clarify requirements, manage trade-offs and support engineering delivery." ], "outputs": [ "Working software", "Code", "Integrations", "Technical documentation" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "9-12" }, { "label": "Validate · Main question", "phase": 4, "box": [ 55.89999999999999, 24.8, 10.499999999999998, 14.900000000000002 ], "question": "Does it work correctly and solve the problem?", "inputs": [ "Release candidate", "Test plan", "Acceptance criteria", "Risk controls" ], "actions": [ "Validate acceptance criteria and coordinate QA and UAT." ], "outputs": [ "Test cases", "Bug reports", "QA sign-off", "UAT approval" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "9-13" }, { "label": "Launch · Main question", "phase": 5, "box": [ 66.69999999999999, 24.8, 10.499999999999998, 14.900000000000002 ], "question": "How do we get it into users’ hands?", "inputs": [ "Approved release", "Launch plan", "Training materials", "Operational runbooks" ], "actions": [ "Prepare launch, release notes, onboarding and go-to-market support." ], "outputs": [ "Release notes", "Launch plan", "Training content", "Support guide" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "9-14" }, { "label": "Improve · Main question", "phase": 6, "box": [ 77.5, 24.8, 10.499999999999998, 14.900000000000002 ], "question": "What should we improve based on learning?", "inputs": [ "Product analytics", "Customer feedback", "Support trends", "Experiment results" ], "actions": [ "Gather feedback, analyze data and prioritize improvements." ], "outputs": [ "Analytics dashboard", "Feedback report", "Improvement backlog" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "9-15" }, { "label": "Scale / Maintain · Main question", "phase": 7, "box": [ 88.3, 24.8, 10.499999999999998, 14.900000000000002 ], "question": "How do we grow, sustain, or sunset it?", "inputs": [ "Growth signals", "Service health", "Unit economics", "Technical debt" ], "actions": [ "Expand roadmap, monitor product health and manage lifecycle decisions." ], "outputs": [ "Growth roadmap", "Scalability plan", "Monitoring dashboard", "Sunset plan" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "9-16" }, { "label": "Discover · PM responsibility", "phase": 0, "box": [ 12.7, 39.8, 10.499999999999998, 18.200000000000003 ], "question": "What problem are we solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Research users, market and pain points. Validate the opportunity." ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Research report", "Personas", "Pain points" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "9-17" }, { "label": "Define · PM responsibility", "phase": 1, "box": [ 23.5, 39.8, 10.499999999999998, 18.200000000000003 ], "question": "What should we build and why?", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Define product strategy, roadmap, feasibility and MVP scope." ], "outputs": [ "Product vision", "Roadmap", "Business case", "Success metrics", "MVP scope" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "9-18" }, { "label": "Design · PM responsibility", "phase": 2, "box": [ 34.3, 39.8, 10.499999999999998, 18.200000000000003 ], "question": "How should the product work and feel?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Create requirements, review UX and align with technical architecture." ], "outputs": [ "PRD", "User stories", "Workflows", "Wireframes", "Prototype", "UI screens" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "9-19" }, { "label": "Build · PM responsibility", "phase": 3, "box": [ 45.099999999999994, 39.8, 10.499999999999998, 18.200000000000003 ], "question": "Can we turn the plan into a working product?", "inputs": [ "Approved designs", "Prioritized backlog", "API contracts", "Acceptance criteria" ], "actions": [ "Clarify requirements, manage trade-offs and support engineering delivery." ], "outputs": [ "Working software", "Code", "Integrations", "Technical documentation" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "9-20" }, { "label": "Validate · PM responsibility", "phase": 4, "box": [ 55.89999999999999, 39.8, 10.499999999999998, 18.200000000000003 ], "question": "Does it work correctly and solve the problem?", "inputs": [ "Release candidate", "Test plan", "Acceptance criteria", "Risk controls" ], "actions": [ "Validate acceptance criteria and coordinate QA and UAT." ], "outputs": [ "Test cases", "Bug reports", "QA sign-off", "UAT approval" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "9-21" }, { "label": "Launch · PM responsibility", "phase": 5, "box": [ 66.69999999999999, 39.8, 10.499999999999998, 18.200000000000003 ], "question": "How do we get it into users’ hands?", "inputs": [ "Approved release", "Launch plan", "Training materials", "Operational runbooks" ], "actions": [ "Prepare launch, release notes, onboarding and go-to-market support." ], "outputs": [ "Release notes", "Launch plan", "Training content", "Support guide" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "9-22" }, { "label": "Improve · PM responsibility", "phase": 6, "box": [ 77.5, 39.8, 10.499999999999998, 18.200000000000003 ], "question": "What should we improve based on learning?", "inputs": [ "Product analytics", "Customer feedback", "Support trends", "Experiment results" ], "actions": [ "Gather feedback, analyze data and prioritize improvements." ], "outputs": [ "Analytics dashboard", "Feedback report", "Improvement backlog" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "9-23" }, { "label": "Scale / Maintain · PM responsibility", "phase": 7, "box": [ 88.3, 39.8, 10.499999999999998, 18.200000000000003 ], "question": "How do we grow, sustain, or sunset it?", "inputs": [ "Growth signals", "Service health", "Unit economics", "Technical debt" ], "actions": [ "Expand roadmap, monitor product health and manage lifecycle decisions." ], "outputs": [ "Growth roadmap", "Scalability plan", "Monitoring dashboard", "Sunset plan" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "9-24" }, { "label": "Discover · Key deliverables", "phase": 0, "box": [ 12.7, 58, 10.499999999999998, 18 ], "question": "What problem are we solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Research users, market and pain points. Validate the opportunity." ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Research report", "Personas", "Pain points" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "9-25" }, { "label": "Define · Key deliverables", "phase": 1, "box": [ 23.5, 58, 10.499999999999998, 18 ], "question": "What should we build and why?", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Define product strategy, roadmap, feasibility and MVP scope." ], "outputs": [ "Product vision", "Roadmap", "Business case", "Success metrics", "MVP scope" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "9-26" }, { "label": "Design · Key deliverables", "phase": 2, "box": [ 34.3, 58, 10.499999999999998, 18 ], "question": "How should the product work and feel?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Create requirements, review UX and align with technical architecture." ], "outputs": [ "PRD", "User stories", "Workflows", "Wireframes", "Prototype", "UI screens" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "9-27" }, { "label": "Build · Key deliverables", "phase": 3, "box": [ 45.099999999999994, 58, 10.499999999999998, 18 ], "question": "Can we turn the plan into a working product?", "inputs": [ "Approved designs", "Prioritized backlog", "API contracts", "Acceptance criteria" ], "actions": [ "Clarify requirements, manage trade-offs and support engineering delivery." ], "outputs": [ "Working software", "Code", "Integrations", "Technical documentation" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "9-28" }, { "label": "Validate · Key deliverables", "phase": 4, "box": [ 55.89999999999999, 58, 10.499999999999998, 18 ], "question": "Does it work correctly and solve the problem?", "inputs": [ "Release candidate", "Test plan", "Acceptance criteria", "Risk controls" ], "actions": [ "Validate acceptance criteria and coordinate QA and UAT." ], "outputs": [ "Test cases", "Bug reports", "QA sign-off", "UAT approval" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "9-29" }, { "label": "Launch · Key deliverables", "phase": 5, "box": [ 66.69999999999999, 58, 10.499999999999998, 18 ], "question": "How do we get it into users’ hands?", "inputs": [ "Approved release", "Launch plan", "Training materials", "Operational runbooks" ], "actions": [ "Prepare launch, release notes, onboarding and go-to-market support." ], "outputs": [ "Release notes", "Launch plan", "Training content", "Support guide" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "9-30" }, { "label": "Improve · Key deliverables", "phase": 6, "box": [ 77.5, 58, 10.499999999999998, 18 ], "question": "What should we improve based on learning?", "inputs": [ "Product analytics", "Customer feedback", "Support trends", "Experiment results" ], "actions": [ "Gather feedback, analyze data and prioritize improvements." ], "outputs": [ "Analytics dashboard", "Feedback report", "Improvement backlog" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "9-31" }, { "label": "Scale / Maintain · Key deliverables", "phase": 7, "box": [ 88.3, 58, 10.499999999999998, 18 ], "question": "How do we grow, sustain, or sunset it?", "inputs": [ "Growth signals", "Service health", "Unit economics", "Technical debt" ], "actions": [ "Expand roadmap, monitor product health and manage lifecycle decisions." ], "outputs": [ "Growth roadmap", "Scalability plan", "Monitoring dashboard", "Sunset plan" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "id": "9-32" }, { "label": "Discover · Outcome / Goal", "phase": 0, "box": [ 12.7, 76, 10.499999999999998, 13 ], "question": "What problem are we solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Research users, market and pain points. Validate the opportunity." ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Research report", "Personas", "Pain points" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "outcome": "Validated problem and target users", "id": "9-33" }, { "label": "Define · Outcome / Goal", "phase": 1, "box": [ 23.5, 76, 10.499999999999998, 13 ], "question": "What should we build and why?", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Define product strategy, roadmap, feasibility and MVP scope." ], "outputs": [ "Product vision", "Roadmap", "Business case", "Success metrics", "MVP scope" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "outcome": "Clear product direction and scope", "id": "9-34" }, { "label": "Design · Outcome / Goal", "phase": 2, "box": [ 34.3, 76, 10.499999999999998, 13 ], "question": "How should the product work and feel?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Create requirements, review UX and align with technical architecture." ], "outputs": [ "PRD", "User stories", "Workflows", "Wireframes", "Prototype", "UI screens" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "outcome": "Build-ready product design", "id": "9-35" }, { "label": "Build · Outcome / Goal", "phase": 3, "box": [ 45.099999999999994, 76, 10.499999999999998, 13 ], "question": "Can we turn the plan into a working product?", "inputs": [ "Approved designs", "Prioritized backlog", "API contracts", "Acceptance criteria" ], "actions": [ "Clarify requirements, manage trade-offs and support engineering delivery." ], "outputs": [ "Working software", "Code", "Integrations", "Technical documentation" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "outcome": "Functional product increment", "id": "9-36" }, { "label": "Validate · Outcome / Goal", "phase": 4, "box": [ 55.89999999999999, 76, 10.499999999999998, 13 ], "question": "Does it work correctly and solve the problem?", "inputs": [ "Release candidate", "Test plan", "Acceptance criteria", "Risk controls" ], "actions": [ "Validate acceptance criteria and coordinate QA and UAT." ], "outputs": [ "Test cases", "Bug reports", "QA sign-off", "UAT approval" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "outcome": "Release-ready quality", "id": "9-37" }, { "label": "Launch · Outcome / Goal", "phase": 5, "box": [ 66.69999999999999, 76, 10.499999999999998, 13 ], "question": "How do we get it into users’ hands?", "inputs": [ "Approved release", "Launch plan", "Training materials", "Operational runbooks" ], "actions": [ "Prepare launch, release notes, onboarding and go-to-market support." ], "outputs": [ "Release notes", "Launch plan", "Training content", "Support guide" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "outcome": "Successful release and adoption start", "id": "9-38" }, { "label": "Improve · Outcome / Goal", "phase": 6, "box": [ 77.5, 76, 10.499999999999998, 13 ], "question": "What should we improve based on learning?", "inputs": [ "Product analytics", "Customer feedback", "Support trends", "Experiment results" ], "actions": [ "Gather feedback, analyze data and prioritize improvements." ], "outputs": [ "Analytics dashboard", "Feedback report", "Improvement backlog" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "outcome": "Prioritized next improvements", "id": "9-39" }, { "label": "Scale / Maintain · Outcome / Goal", "phase": 7, "box": [ 88.3, 76, 10.499999999999998, 13 ], "question": "How do we grow, sustain, or sunset it?", "inputs": [ "Growth signals", "Service health", "Unit economics", "Technical debt" ], "actions": [ "Expand roadmap, monitor product health and manage lifecycle decisions." ], "outputs": [ "Growth roadmap", "Scalability plan", "Monitoring dashboard", "Sunset plan" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Question, responsibility and deliverables transcribed from the artwork; gate and suggested measures use the reference model.", "outcome": "Sustained growth, health and lifecycle control", "id": "9-40" } ] }, "navigationLabel": "Swimlanes" } ] }, { "name": "Teams & Collaboration", "diagramCount": 4, "diagrams": [ { "id": 10, "title": "Teams Involvement Across the SaaS Product Development Lifecycle", "category": "Teams & Collaboration", "image": "/images/pdlc/10-teams-involved.png", "tab": 3, "type": "original", "interactiveRegions": 186, "artwork": { "width": 1055, "height": 1491, "regions": [ { "label": "Founder / Strategy · Idea", "phase": 0, "box": [ 15.2, 22.4, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "set strategic boundaries" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "sourceStage": "Idea", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-1" }, { "label": "Founder / Strategy · Research", "phase": 0, "box": [ 20.424999999999997, 22.4, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "set strategic boundaries" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "sourceStage": "Research", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-2" }, { "label": "Founder / Strategy · Validation", "phase": 0, "box": [ 25.65, 22.4, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "set strategic boundaries" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "sourceStage": "Validation", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-3" }, { "label": "Founder / Strategy · Strategy", "phase": 1, "box": [ 30.875, 22.4, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "review investment case" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "sourceStage": "Strategy", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-4" }, { "label": "Founder / Strategy · MVP Scope", "phase": 1, "box": [ 36.099999999999994, 22.4, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "review investment case" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "sourceStage": "MVP Scope", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-5" }, { "label": "Founder / Strategy · Requirements", "phase": 2, "box": [ 41.325, 22.4, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "review trade-offs" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "sourceStage": "Requirements", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-6" }, { "label": "Founder / Strategy · Design", "phase": 2, "box": [ 46.55, 22.4, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "review trade-offs" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "sourceStage": "Design", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-7" }, { "label": "Founder / Strategy · Architecture", "phase": 2, "box": [ 51.77499999999999, 22.4, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "review trade-offs" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "sourceStage": "Architecture", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-8" }, { "label": "Founder / Strategy · Build", "phase": 3, "box": [ 57.0, 22.4, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "resolve escalations" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "sourceStage": "Build", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "10-9" }, { "label": "Founder / Strategy · Test", "phase": 4, "box": [ 62.224999999999994, 22.4, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "review business readiness" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "sourceStage": "Test", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "10-10" }, { "label": "Founder / Strategy · UAT", "phase": 4, "box": [ 67.45, 22.4, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "review business readiness" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "sourceStage": "UAT", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-11" }, { "label": "Founder / Strategy · Launch", "phase": 5, "box": [ 72.675, 22.4, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "sponsor release" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "sourceStage": "Launch", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-12" }, { "label": "Founder / Strategy · Feedback", "phase": 6, "box": [ 77.89999999999999, 22.4, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "review performance" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "sourceStage": "Feedback", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-13" }, { "label": "Founder / Strategy · Optimize", "phase": 6, "box": [ 83.125, 22.4, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "review performance" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "sourceStage": "Optimize", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-14" }, { "label": "Founder / Strategy · Scale", "phase": 7, "box": [ 88.35, 22.4, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "decide long-term investment" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "sourceStage": "Scale", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-15" }, { "label": "Founder / Strategy · Maintain", "phase": 7, "box": [ 93.575, 22.4, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "decide long-term investment" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "sourceStage": "Maintain", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-16" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · Idea", "phase": 0, "box": [ 15.2, 27.589999999999996, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "frame the opportunity" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "sourceStage": "Idea", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-17" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · Research", "phase": 0, "box": [ 20.424999999999997, 27.589999999999996, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "frame the opportunity" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "sourceStage": "Research", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-18" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · Validation", "phase": 0, "box": [ 25.65, 27.589999999999996, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "frame the opportunity" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "sourceStage": "Validation", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-19" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · Strategy", "phase": 1, "box": [ 30.875, 27.589999999999996, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "define outcomes and scope" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "sourceStage": "Strategy", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-20" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · MVP Scope", "phase": 1, "box": [ 36.099999999999994, 27.589999999999996, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "define outcomes and scope" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "sourceStage": "MVP Scope", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-21" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · Requirements", "phase": 2, "box": [ 41.325, 27.589999999999996, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "refine product requirements" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "sourceStage": "Requirements", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-22" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · Design", "phase": 2, "box": [ 46.55, 27.589999999999996, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "refine product requirements" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "sourceStage": "Design", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-23" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · Architecture", "phase": 2, "box": [ 51.77499999999999, 27.589999999999996, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "refine product requirements" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "sourceStage": "Architecture", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-24" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · Build", "phase": 3, "box": [ 57.0, 27.589999999999996, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "prioritize and clarify backlog" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "sourceStage": "Build", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-25" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · Test", "phase": 4, "box": [ 62.224999999999994, 27.589999999999996, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "review product acceptance" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "sourceStage": "Test", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-26" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · UAT", "phase": 4, "box": [ 67.45, 27.589999999999996, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "review product acceptance" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "sourceStage": "UAT", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-27" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · Launch", "phase": 5, "box": [ 72.675, 27.589999999999996, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "coordinate launch" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "sourceStage": "Launch", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-28" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · Feedback", "phase": 6, "box": [ 77.89999999999999, 27.589999999999996, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "prioritize improvements" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "sourceStage": "Feedback", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-29" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · Optimize", "phase": 6, "box": [ 83.125, 27.589999999999996, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "prioritize improvements" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "sourceStage": "Optimize", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-30" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · Scale", "phase": 7, "box": [ 88.35, 27.589999999999996, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "own lifecycle roadmap" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "sourceStage": "Scale", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-31" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · Maintain", "phase": 7, "box": [ 93.575, 27.589999999999996, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "own lifecycle roadmap" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "sourceStage": "Maintain", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-32" }, { "label": "Design · Idea", "phase": 0, "box": [ 15.2, 32.78, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "map current journeys" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Design", "sourceStage": "Idea", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "10-33" }, { "label": "Design · Research", "phase": 0, "box": [ 20.424999999999997, 32.78, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "map current journeys" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Design", "sourceStage": "Research", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-34" }, { "label": "Design · Validation", "phase": 0, "box": [ 25.65, 32.78, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "map current journeys" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Design", "sourceStage": "Validation", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-35" }, { "label": "Design · Strategy", "phase": 1, "box": [ 30.875, 32.78, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "shape solution concepts" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Design", "sourceStage": "Strategy", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-36" }, { "label": "Design · MVP Scope", "phase": 1, "box": [ 36.099999999999994, 32.78, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "shape solution concepts" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Design", "sourceStage": "MVP Scope", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-37" }, { "label": "Design · Requirements", "phase": 2, "box": [ 41.325, 32.78, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "design user flows" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Design", "sourceStage": "Requirements", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-38" }, { "label": "Design · Design", "phase": 2, "box": [ 46.55, 32.78, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "design user flows" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Design", "sourceStage": "Design", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-39" }, { "label": "Design · Architecture", "phase": 2, "box": [ 51.77499999999999, 32.78, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "design user flows" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Design", "sourceStage": "Architecture", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-40" }, { "label": "Design · Build", "phase": 3, "box": [ 57.0, 32.78, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "review implementation fidelity" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Design", "sourceStage": "Build", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-41" }, { "label": "Design · Test", "phase": 4, "box": [ 62.224999999999994, 32.78, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "verify UX quality" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Design", "sourceStage": "Test", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-42" }, { "label": "Design · UAT", "phase": 4, "box": [ 67.45, 32.78, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "verify UX quality" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Design", "sourceStage": "UAT", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-43" }, { "label": "Design · Launch", "phase": 5, "box": [ 72.675, 32.78, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "address UX friction" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Design", "sourceStage": "Launch", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-44" }, { "label": "Design · Feedback", "phase": 6, "box": [ 77.89999999999999, 32.78, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "refine experiences" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Design", "sourceStage": "Feedback", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-45" }, { "label": "Design · Optimize", "phase": 6, "box": [ 83.125, 32.78, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "refine experiences" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Design", "sourceStage": "Optimize", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-46" }, { "label": "Design · Scale", "phase": 7, "box": [ 88.35, 32.78, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "extend design system" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Design", "sourceStage": "Scale", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-47" }, { "label": "Design · Maintain", "phase": 7, "box": [ 93.575, 32.78, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "extend design system" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Design", "sourceStage": "Maintain", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "10-48" }, { "label": "Engineering · Idea", "phase": 0, "box": [ 15.2, 37.97, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "assess feasibility" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Engineering", "sourceStage": "Idea", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "10-49" }, { "label": "Engineering · Research", "phase": 0, "box": [ 20.424999999999997, 37.97, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "assess feasibility" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Engineering", "sourceStage": "Research", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-50" }, { "label": "Engineering · Validation", "phase": 0, "box": [ 25.65, 37.97, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "assess feasibility" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Engineering", "sourceStage": "Validation", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-51" }, { "label": "Engineering · Strategy", "phase": 1, "box": [ 30.875, 37.97, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "estimate delivery" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Engineering", "sourceStage": "Strategy", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-52" }, { "label": "Engineering · MVP Scope", "phase": 1, "box": [ 36.099999999999994, 37.97, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "estimate delivery" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Engineering", "sourceStage": "MVP Scope", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-53" }, { "label": "Engineering · Requirements", "phase": 2, "box": [ 41.325, 37.97, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "review technical feasibility" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Engineering", "sourceStage": "Requirements", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-54" }, { "label": "Engineering · Design", "phase": 2, "box": [ 46.55, 37.97, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "review technical feasibility" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Engineering", "sourceStage": "Design", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-55" }, { "label": "Engineering · Architecture", "phase": 2, "box": [ 51.77499999999999, 37.97, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "review technical feasibility" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Engineering", "sourceStage": "Architecture", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-56" }, { "label": "Engineering · Build", "phase": 3, "box": [ 57.0, 37.97, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "build features" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Engineering", "sourceStage": "Build", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-57" }, { "label": "Engineering · Test", "phase": 4, "box": [ 62.224999999999994, 37.97, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "fix defects" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Engineering", "sourceStage": "Test", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-58" }, { "label": "Engineering · UAT", "phase": 4, "box": [ 67.45, 37.97, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "fix defects" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Engineering", "sourceStage": "UAT", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-59" }, { "label": "Engineering · Launch", "phase": 5, "box": [ 72.675, 37.97, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "release features" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Engineering", "sourceStage": "Launch", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-60" }, { "label": "Engineering · Feedback", "phase": 6, "box": [ 77.89999999999999, 37.97, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "deliver enhancements" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Engineering", "sourceStage": "Feedback", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-61" }, { "label": "Engineering · Optimize", "phase": 6, "box": [ 83.125, 37.97, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "deliver enhancements" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Engineering", "sourceStage": "Optimize", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-62" }, { "label": "Engineering · Scale", "phase": 7, "box": [ 88.35, 37.97, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "maintain and scale software" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Engineering", "sourceStage": "Scale", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-63" }, { "label": "Engineering · Maintain", "phase": 7, "box": [ 93.575, 37.97, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "maintain and scale software" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Engineering", "sourceStage": "Maintain", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-64" }, { "label": "QA · Idea", "phase": 0, "box": [ 15.2, 43.16, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "analyze quality pain points" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "QA", "sourceStage": "Idea", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "10-65" }, { "label": "QA · Research", "phase": 0, "box": [ 20.424999999999997, 43.16, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "analyze quality pain points" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "QA", "sourceStage": "Research", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "10-66" }, { "label": "QA · Validation", "phase": 0, "box": [ 25.65, 43.16, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "analyze quality pain points" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "QA", "sourceStage": "Validation", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "10-67" }, { "label": "QA · Strategy", "phase": 1, "box": [ 30.875, 43.16, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "define test strategy" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "QA", "sourceStage": "Strategy", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "10-68" }, { "label": "QA · MVP Scope", "phase": 1, "box": [ 36.099999999999994, 43.16, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "define test strategy" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "QA", "sourceStage": "MVP Scope", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-69" }, { "label": "QA · Requirements", "phase": 2, "box": [ 41.325, 43.16, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "design test coverage" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "QA", "sourceStage": "Requirements", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-70" }, { "label": "QA · Design", "phase": 2, "box": [ 46.55, 43.16, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "design test coverage" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "QA", "sourceStage": "Design", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-71" }, { "label": "QA · Architecture", "phase": 2, "box": [ 51.77499999999999, 43.16, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "design test coverage" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "QA", "sourceStage": "Architecture", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-72" }, { "label": "QA · Build", "phase": 3, "box": [ 57.0, 43.16, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "test increments" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "QA", "sourceStage": "Build", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-73" }, { "label": "QA · Test", "phase": 4, "box": [ 62.224999999999994, 43.16, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "execute QA/UAT" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "QA", "sourceStage": "Test", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-74" }, { "label": "QA · UAT", "phase": 4, "box": [ 67.45, 43.16, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "execute QA/UAT" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "QA", "sourceStage": "UAT", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-75" }, { "label": "QA · Launch", "phase": 5, "box": [ 72.675, 43.16, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "run smoke tests" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "QA", "sourceStage": "Launch", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-76" }, { "label": "QA · Feedback", "phase": 6, "box": [ 77.89999999999999, 43.16, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "expand regression tests" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "QA", "sourceStage": "Feedback", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-77" }, { "label": "QA · Optimize", "phase": 6, "box": [ 83.125, 43.16, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "expand regression tests" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "QA", "sourceStage": "Optimize", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-78" }, { "label": "QA · Scale", "phase": 7, "box": [ 88.35, 43.16, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "sustain quality automation" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "QA", "sourceStage": "Scale", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "10-79" }, { "label": "QA · Maintain", "phase": 7, "box": [ 93.575, 43.16, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "sustain quality automation" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "QA", "sourceStage": "Maintain", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-80" }, { "label": "DevOps · Idea", "phase": 0, "box": [ 15.2, 48.349999999999994, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "review operational constraints" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "DevOps", "sourceStage": "Idea", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "10-81" }, { "label": "DevOps · Research", "phase": 0, "box": [ 20.424999999999997, 48.349999999999994, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "review operational constraints" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "DevOps", "sourceStage": "Research", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "10-82" }, { "label": "DevOps · Validation", "phase": 0, "box": [ 25.65, 48.349999999999994, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "review operational constraints" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "DevOps", "sourceStage": "Validation", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "10-83" }, { "label": "DevOps · Strategy", "phase": 1, "box": [ 30.875, 48.349999999999994, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "define SLOs" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "DevOps", "sourceStage": "Strategy", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "10-84" }, { "label": "DevOps · MVP Scope", "phase": 1, "box": [ 36.099999999999994, 48.349999999999994, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "define SLOs" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "DevOps", "sourceStage": "MVP Scope", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-85" }, { "label": "DevOps · Requirements", "phase": 2, "box": [ 41.325, 48.349999999999994, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "plan environments" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "DevOps", "sourceStage": "Requirements", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "10-86" }, { "label": "DevOps · Design", "phase": 2, "box": [ 46.55, 48.349999999999994, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "plan environments" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "DevOps", "sourceStage": "Design", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "10-87" }, { "label": "DevOps · Architecture", "phase": 2, "box": [ 51.77499999999999, 48.349999999999994, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "plan environments" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "DevOps", "sourceStage": "Architecture", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-88" }, { "label": "DevOps · Build", "phase": 3, "box": [ 57.0, 48.349999999999994, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "configure CI/CD" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "DevOps", "sourceStage": "Build", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-89" }, { "label": "DevOps · Test", "phase": 4, "box": [ 62.224999999999994, 48.349999999999994, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "test rollback" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "DevOps", "sourceStage": "Test", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-90" }, { "label": "DevOps · UAT", "phase": 4, "box": [ 67.45, 48.349999999999994, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "test rollback" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "DevOps", "sourceStage": "UAT", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-91" }, { "label": "DevOps · Launch", "phase": 5, "box": [ 72.675, 48.349999999999994, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "operate rollout" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "DevOps", "sourceStage": "Launch", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-92" }, { "label": "DevOps · Feedback", "phase": 6, "box": [ 77.89999999999999, 48.349999999999994, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "reduce incidents" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "DevOps", "sourceStage": "Feedback", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "10-93" }, { "label": "DevOps · Optimize", "phase": 6, "box": [ 83.125, 48.349999999999994, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "reduce incidents" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "DevOps", "sourceStage": "Optimize", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-94" }, { "label": "DevOps · Scale", "phase": 7, "box": [ 88.35, 48.349999999999994, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "plan capacity" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "DevOps", "sourceStage": "Scale", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-95" }, { "label": "DevOps · Maintain", "phase": 7, "box": [ 93.575, 48.349999999999994, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "plan capacity" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "DevOps", "sourceStage": "Maintain", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-96" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · Idea", "phase": 0, "box": [ 15.2, 53.53999999999999, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "identify support themes" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "sourceStage": "Idea", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-97" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · Research", "phase": 0, "box": [ 20.424999999999997, 53.53999999999999, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "identify support themes" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "sourceStage": "Research", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-98" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · Validation", "phase": 0, "box": [ 25.65, 53.53999999999999, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "identify support themes" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "sourceStage": "Validation", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-99" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · Strategy", "phase": 1, "box": [ 30.875, 53.53999999999999, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "define onboarding needs" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "sourceStage": "Strategy", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-100" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · MVP Scope", "phase": 1, "box": [ 36.099999999999994, 53.53999999999999, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "define onboarding needs" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "sourceStage": "MVP Scope", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-101" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · Requirements", "phase": 2, "box": [ 41.325, 53.53999999999999, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "design support journeys" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "sourceStage": "Requirements", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-102" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · Design", "phase": 2, "box": [ 46.55, 53.53999999999999, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "design support journeys" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "sourceStage": "Design", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-103" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · Architecture", "phase": 2, "box": [ 51.77499999999999, 53.53999999999999, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "design support journeys" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "sourceStage": "Architecture", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "10-104" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · Build", "phase": 3, "box": [ 57.0, 53.53999999999999, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "draft help content" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "sourceStage": "Build", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "10-105" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · Test", "phase": 4, "box": [ 62.224999999999994, 53.53999999999999, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "test onboarding" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "sourceStage": "Test", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-106" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · UAT", "phase": 4, "box": [ 67.45, 53.53999999999999, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "test onboarding" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "sourceStage": "UAT", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-107" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · Launch", "phase": 5, "box": [ 72.675, 53.53999999999999, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "onboard customers" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "sourceStage": "Launch", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-108" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · Feedback", "phase": 6, "box": [ 77.89999999999999, 53.53999999999999, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "improve adoption" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "sourceStage": "Feedback", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-109" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · Optimize", "phase": 6, "box": [ 83.125, 53.53999999999999, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "improve adoption" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "sourceStage": "Optimize", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-110" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · Scale", "phase": 7, "box": [ 88.35, 53.53999999999999, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "manage retention" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "sourceStage": "Scale", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-111" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · Maintain", "phase": 7, "box": [ 93.575, 53.53999999999999, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "manage retention" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "sourceStage": "Maintain", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-112" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · Idea", "phase": 0, "box": [ 15.2, 58.73, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "analyze market segments" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "sourceStage": "Idea", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-113" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · Research", "phase": 0, "box": [ 20.424999999999997, 58.73, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "analyze market segments" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "sourceStage": "Research", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-114" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · Validation", "phase": 0, "box": [ 25.65, 58.73, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "analyze market segments" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "sourceStage": "Validation", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-115" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · Strategy", "phase": 1, "box": [ 30.875, 58.73, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "define positioning" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "sourceStage": "Strategy", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-116" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · MVP Scope", "phase": 1, "box": [ 36.099999999999994, 58.73, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "define positioning" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "sourceStage": "MVP Scope", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-117" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · Requirements", "phase": 2, "box": [ 41.325, 58.73, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "review messaging" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "sourceStage": "Requirements", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "10-118" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · Design", "phase": 2, "box": [ 46.55, 58.73, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "review messaging" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "sourceStage": "Design", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "10-119" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · Architecture", "phase": 2, "box": [ 51.77499999999999, 58.73, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "review messaging" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "sourceStage": "Architecture", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "10-120" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · Build", "phase": 3, "box": [ 57.0, 58.73, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "prepare launch assets" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "sourceStage": "Build", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "10-121" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · Test", "phase": 4, "box": [ 62.224999999999994, 58.73, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "verify claims" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "sourceStage": "Test", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "10-122" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · UAT", "phase": 4, "box": [ 67.45, 58.73, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "verify claims" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "sourceStage": "UAT", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "10-123" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · Launch", "phase": 5, "box": [ 72.675, 58.73, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "run campaigns" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "sourceStage": "Launch", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-124" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · Feedback", "phase": 6, "box": [ 77.89999999999999, 58.73, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "optimize messaging" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "sourceStage": "Feedback", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-125" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · Optimize", "phase": 6, "box": [ 83.125, 58.73, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "optimize messaging" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "sourceStage": "Optimize", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-126" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · Scale", "phase": 7, "box": [ 88.35, 58.73, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "support expansion" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "sourceStage": "Scale", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-127" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · Maintain", "phase": 7, "box": [ 93.575, 58.73, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "support expansion" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "sourceStage": "Maintain", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "10-128" }, { "label": "Data / Analytics · Idea", "phase": 0, "box": [ 15.2, 63.919999999999995, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Usage data and measurement plan" ], "actions": [ "establish metric baselines" ], "outputs": [ "Analytics and product insights" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Data / Analytics", "sourceStage": "Idea", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "10-129" }, { "label": "Data / Analytics · Research", "phase": 0, "box": [ 20.424999999999997, 63.919999999999995, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Usage data and measurement plan" ], "actions": [ "establish metric baselines" ], "outputs": [ "Analytics and product insights" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Data / Analytics", "sourceStage": "Research", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-130" }, { "label": "Data / Analytics · Validation", "phase": 0, "box": [ 25.65, 63.919999999999995, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Usage data and measurement plan" ], "actions": [ "establish metric baselines" ], "outputs": [ "Analytics and product insights" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Data / Analytics", "sourceStage": "Validation", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-131" }, { "label": "Data / Analytics · Strategy", "phase": 1, "box": [ 30.875, 63.919999999999995, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Usage data and measurement plan" ], "actions": [ "define KPIs" ], "outputs": [ "Analytics and product insights" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Data / Analytics", "sourceStage": "Strategy", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-132" }, { "label": "Data / Analytics · MVP Scope", "phase": 1, "box": [ 36.099999999999994, 63.919999999999995, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Usage data and measurement plan" ], "actions": [ "define KPIs" ], "outputs": [ "Analytics and product insights" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Data / Analytics", "sourceStage": "MVP Scope", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-133" }, { "label": "Data / Analytics · Requirements", "phase": 2, "box": [ 41.325, 63.919999999999995, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Usage data and measurement plan" ], "actions": [ "specify event tracking" ], "outputs": [ "Analytics and product insights" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Data / Analytics", "sourceStage": "Requirements", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-134" }, { "label": "Data / Analytics · Design", "phase": 2, "box": [ 46.55, 63.919999999999995, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Usage data and measurement plan" ], "actions": [ "specify event tracking" ], "outputs": [ "Analytics and product insights" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Data / Analytics", "sourceStage": "Design", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "10-135" }, { "label": "Data / Analytics · Architecture", "phase": 2, "box": [ 51.77499999999999, 63.919999999999995, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Usage data and measurement plan" ], "actions": [ "specify event tracking" ], "outputs": [ "Analytics and product insights" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Data / Analytics", "sourceStage": "Architecture", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-136" }, { "label": "Data / Analytics · Build", "phase": 3, "box": [ 57.0, 63.919999999999995, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Usage data and measurement plan" ], "actions": [ "implement instrumentation" ], "outputs": [ "Analytics and product insights" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Data / Analytics", "sourceStage": "Build", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-137" }, { "label": "Data / Analytics · Test", "phase": 4, "box": [ 62.224999999999994, 63.919999999999995, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Usage data and measurement plan" ], "actions": [ "verify data quality" ], "outputs": [ "Analytics and product insights" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Data / Analytics", "sourceStage": "Test", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-138" }, { "label": "Data / Analytics · UAT", "phase": 4, "box": [ 67.45, 63.919999999999995, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Usage data and measurement plan" ], "actions": [ "verify data quality" ], "outputs": [ "Analytics and product insights" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Data / Analytics", "sourceStage": "UAT", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-139" }, { "label": "Data / Analytics · Launch", "phase": 5, "box": [ 72.675, 63.919999999999995, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Usage data and measurement plan" ], "actions": [ "monitor activation" ], "outputs": [ "Analytics and product insights" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Data / Analytics", "sourceStage": "Launch", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-140" }, { "label": "Data / Analytics · Feedback", "phase": 6, "box": [ 77.89999999999999, 63.919999999999995, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Usage data and measurement plan" ], "actions": [ "analyze cohorts" ], "outputs": [ "Analytics and product insights" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Data / Analytics", "sourceStage": "Feedback", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-141" }, { "label": "Data / Analytics · Optimize", "phase": 6, "box": [ 83.125, 63.919999999999995, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Usage data and measurement plan" ], "actions": [ "analyze cohorts" ], "outputs": [ "Analytics and product insights" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Data / Analytics", "sourceStage": "Optimize", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-142" }, { "label": "Data / Analytics · Scale", "phase": 7, "box": [ 88.35, 63.919999999999995, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Usage data and measurement plan" ], "actions": [ "monitor product health" ], "outputs": [ "Analytics and product insights" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Data / Analytics", "sourceStage": "Scale", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-143" }, { "label": "Data / Analytics · Maintain", "phase": 7, "box": [ 93.575, 63.919999999999995, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Usage data and measurement plan" ], "actions": [ "monitor product health" ], "outputs": [ "Analytics and product insights" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Data / Analytics", "sourceStage": "Maintain", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-144" }, { "label": "Security / Compliance · Idea", "phase": 0, "box": [ 15.2, 69.10999999999999, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Data flows and risk obligations" ], "actions": [ "identify early risks" ], "outputs": [ "Risk controls and compliance evidence" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Security / Compliance", "sourceStage": "Idea", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "10-145" }, { "label": "Security / Compliance · Research", "phase": 0, "box": [ 20.424999999999997, 69.10999999999999, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Data flows and risk obligations" ], "actions": [ "identify early risks" ], "outputs": [ "Risk controls and compliance evidence" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Security / Compliance", "sourceStage": "Research", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "10-146" }, { "label": "Security / Compliance · Validation", "phase": 0, "box": [ 25.65, 69.10999999999999, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Data flows and risk obligations" ], "actions": [ "identify early risks" ], "outputs": [ "Risk controls and compliance evidence" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Security / Compliance", "sourceStage": "Validation", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-147" }, { "label": "Security / Compliance · Strategy", "phase": 1, "box": [ 30.875, 69.10999999999999, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Data flows and risk obligations" ], "actions": [ "specify controls" ], "outputs": [ "Risk controls and compliance evidence" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Security / Compliance", "sourceStage": "Strategy", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-148" }, { "label": "Security / Compliance · MVP Scope", "phase": 1, "box": [ 36.099999999999994, 69.10999999999999, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Data flows and risk obligations" ], "actions": [ "specify controls" ], "outputs": [ "Risk controls and compliance evidence" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Security / Compliance", "sourceStage": "MVP Scope", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-149" }, { "label": "Security / Compliance · Requirements", "phase": 2, "box": [ 41.325, 69.10999999999999, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Data flows and risk obligations" ], "actions": [ "review threat model" ], "outputs": [ "Risk controls and compliance evidence" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Security / Compliance", "sourceStage": "Requirements", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-150" }, { "label": "Security / Compliance · Design", "phase": 2, "box": [ 46.55, 69.10999999999999, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Data flows and risk obligations" ], "actions": [ "review threat model" ], "outputs": [ "Risk controls and compliance evidence" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Security / Compliance", "sourceStage": "Design", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-151" }, { "label": "Security / Compliance · Architecture", "phase": 2, "box": [ 51.77499999999999, 69.10999999999999, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Data flows and risk obligations" ], "actions": [ "review threat model" ], "outputs": [ "Risk controls and compliance evidence" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Security / Compliance", "sourceStage": "Architecture", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-152" }, { "label": "Security / Compliance · Build", "phase": 3, "box": [ 57.0, 69.10999999999999, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Data flows and risk obligations" ], "actions": [ "scan vulnerabilities" ], "outputs": [ "Risk controls and compliance evidence" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Security / Compliance", "sourceStage": "Build", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-153" }, { "label": "Security / Compliance · Test", "phase": 4, "box": [ 62.224999999999994, 69.10999999999999, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Data flows and risk obligations" ], "actions": [ "test safeguards" ], "outputs": [ "Risk controls and compliance evidence" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Security / Compliance", "sourceStage": "Test", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-154" }, { "label": "Security / Compliance · UAT", "phase": 4, "box": [ 67.45, 69.10999999999999, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Data flows and risk obligations" ], "actions": [ "test safeguards" ], "outputs": [ "Risk controls and compliance evidence" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Security / Compliance", "sourceStage": "UAT", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-155" }, { "label": "Security / Compliance · Launch", "phase": 5, "box": [ 72.675, 69.10999999999999, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Data flows and risk obligations" ], "actions": [ "verify controls" ], "outputs": [ "Risk controls and compliance evidence" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Security / Compliance", "sourceStage": "Launch", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-156" }, { "label": "Security / Compliance · Feedback", "phase": 6, "box": [ 77.89999999999999, 69.10999999999999, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Data flows and risk obligations" ], "actions": [ "review emerging risks" ], "outputs": [ "Risk controls and compliance evidence" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Security / Compliance", "sourceStage": "Feedback", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "10-157" }, { "label": "Security / Compliance · Optimize", "phase": 6, "box": [ 83.125, 69.10999999999999, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Data flows and risk obligations" ], "actions": [ "review emerging risks" ], "outputs": [ "Risk controls and compliance evidence" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Security / Compliance", "sourceStage": "Optimize", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "10-158" }, { "label": "Security / Compliance · Scale", "phase": 7, "box": [ 88.35, 69.10999999999999, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Data flows and risk obligations" ], "actions": [ "maintain controls" ], "outputs": [ "Risk controls and compliance evidence" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Security / Compliance", "sourceStage": "Scale", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-159" }, { "label": "Security / Compliance · Maintain", "phase": 7, "box": [ 93.575, 69.10999999999999, 5.225, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Data flows and risk obligations" ], "actions": [ "maintain controls" ], "outputs": [ "Risk controls and compliance evidence" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Security / Compliance", "sourceStage": "Maintain", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "10-160" }, { "label": "Idea · Stage header", "phase": 0, "box": [ 15.2, 15.1, 5.225, 7.3 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Interview customers and stakeholders", "Synthesize evidence", "Frame the opportunity", "Validate problem assumptions" ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Problem statement", "Research findings", "Initial success measures" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "10-161" }, { "label": "Research · Stage header", "phase": 0, "box": [ 20.424999999999997, 15.1, 5.225, 7.3 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Interview customers and stakeholders", "Synthesize evidence", "Frame the opportunity", "Validate problem assumptions" ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Problem statement", "Research findings", "Initial success measures" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "10-162" }, { "label": "Validation · Stage header", "phase": 0, "box": [ 25.65, 15.1, 5.225, 7.3 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Interview customers and stakeholders", "Synthesize evidence", "Frame the opportunity", "Validate problem assumptions" ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Problem statement", "Research findings", "Initial success measures" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "10-163" }, { "label": "Strategy · Stage header", "phase": 1, "box": [ 30.875, 15.1, 5.225, 7.3 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Define outcomes and MVP", "Prioritize requirements", "Assess feasibility and ROI", "Align stakeholders" ], "outputs": [ "Product strategy", "Prioritized roadmap", "MVP scope", "Success metrics" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "10-164" }, { "label": "MVP Scope · Stage header", "phase": 1, "box": [ 36.099999999999994, 15.1, 5.225, 7.3 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Define outcomes and MVP", "Prioritize requirements", "Assess feasibility and ROI", "Align stakeholders" ], "outputs": [ "Product strategy", "Prioritized roadmap", "MVP scope", "Success metrics" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "10-165" }, { "label": "Requirements · Stage header", "phase": 2, "box": [ 41.325, 15.1, 5.225, 7.3 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Prototype experiences", "Design integrations", "Test concepts", "Refine acceptance criteria" ], "outputs": [ "UX prototypes", "Technical design", "User stories", "Test scenarios" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "10-166" }, { "label": "Design · Stage header", "phase": 2, "box": [ 46.55, 15.1, 5.225, 7.3 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Prototype experiences", "Design integrations", "Test concepts", "Refine acceptance criteria" ], "outputs": [ "UX prototypes", "Technical design", "User stories", "Test scenarios" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "10-167" }, { "label": "Architecture · Stage header", "phase": 2, "box": [ 51.77499999999999, 15.1, 5.225, 7.3 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Prototype experiences", "Design integrations", "Test concepts", "Refine acceptance criteria" ], "outputs": [ "UX prototypes", "Technical design", "User stories", "Test scenarios" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "10-168" }, { "label": "Build · Stage header", "phase": 3, "box": [ 57.0, 15.1, 5.225, 7.3 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Approved designs", "Prioritized backlog", "API contracts", "Acceptance criteria" ], "actions": [ "Build and integrate features", "Review increments", "Resolve trade-offs", "Instrument analytics" ], "outputs": [ "Working increments", "Source code", "Integrated services", "Updated documentation" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "10-169" }, { "label": "Test · Stage header", "phase": 4, "box": [ 62.224999999999994, 15.1, 5.225, 7.3 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Release candidate", "Test plan", "Acceptance criteria", "Risk controls" ], "actions": [ "Run QA and UAT", "Validate analytics", "Review security", "Resolve critical defects" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence", "UAT results", "Release readiness", "Remediation list" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "10-170" }, { "label": "UAT · Stage header", "phase": 4, "box": [ 67.45, 15.1, 5.225, 7.3 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Release candidate", "Test plan", "Acceptance criteria", "Risk controls" ], "actions": [ "Run QA and UAT", "Validate analytics", "Review security", "Resolve critical defects" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence", "UAT results", "Release readiness", "Remediation list" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "10-171" }, { "label": "Launch · Stage header", "phase": 5, "box": [ 72.675, 15.1, 5.225, 7.3 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Approved release", "Launch plan", "Training materials", "Operational runbooks" ], "actions": [ "Coordinate rollout", "Enable sales and support", "Monitor incidents", "Measure activation" ], "outputs": [ "Production release", "Release notes", "Launch communications", "Early adoption dashboard" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "10-172" }, { "label": "Feedback · Stage header", "phase": 6, "box": [ 77.89999999999999, 15.1, 5.225, 7.3 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Product analytics", "Customer feedback", "Support trends", "Experiment results" ], "actions": [ "Analyze behavior", "Prioritize improvements", "Run experiments", "Update roadmap" ], "outputs": [ "Improvement backlog", "Experiment insights", "Updated roadmap", "Product health review" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "10-173" }, { "label": "Optimize · Stage header", "phase": 6, "box": [ 83.125, 15.1, 5.225, 7.3 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Product analytics", "Customer feedback", "Support trends", "Experiment results" ], "actions": [ "Analyze behavior", "Prioritize improvements", "Run experiments", "Update roadmap" ], "outputs": [ "Improvement backlog", "Experiment insights", "Updated roadmap", "Product health review" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "10-174" }, { "label": "Scale · Stage header", "phase": 7, "box": [ 88.35, 15.1, 5.225, 7.3 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Growth signals", "Service health", "Unit economics", "Technical debt" ], "actions": [ "Plan capacity", "Optimize reliability", "Expand markets", "Review lifecycle investments" ], "outputs": [ "Scale roadmap", "Capacity plan", "Sustainability review", "Retirement plan if needed" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "10-175" }, { "label": "Maintain · Stage header", "phase": 7, "box": [ 93.575, 15.1, 5.225, 7.3 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Growth signals", "Service health", "Unit economics", "Technical debt" ], "actions": [ "Plan capacity", "Optimize reliability", "Expand markets", "Review lifecycle investments" ], "outputs": [ "Scale roadmap", "Capacity plan", "Sustainability review", "Retirement plan if needed" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "10-176" }, { "label": "Founder / Strategy · Team overview", "phase": 0, "box": [ 1.1, 22.4, 14.1, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "Align business strategy and investment" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "id": "10-177" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · Team overview", "phase": 0, "box": [ 1.1, 27.589999999999996, 14.1, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "Lead product direction and decisions" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "id": "10-178" }, { "label": "Design · Team overview", "phase": 0, "box": [ 1.1, 32.78, 14.1, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "Design and refine user experiences" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Design", "id": "10-179" }, { "label": "Engineering · Team overview", "phase": 0, "box": [ 1.1, 37.97, 14.1, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "Implement and integrate the solution" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Engineering", "id": "10-180" }, { "label": "QA · Team overview", "phase": 0, "box": [ 1.1, 43.16, 14.1, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "Verify quality and acceptance criteria" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "QA", "id": "10-181" }, { "label": "DevOps · Team overview", "phase": 0, "box": [ 1.1, 48.349999999999994, 14.1, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "Ensure deployment and operational reliability" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "DevOps", "id": "10-182" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · Team overview", "phase": 0, "box": [ 1.1, 53.53999999999999, 14.1, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "Enable adoption and support customers" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "id": "10-183" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · Team overview", "phase": 0, "box": [ 1.1, 58.73, 14.1, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "Shape positioning and market communications" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "id": "10-184" }, { "label": "Data / Analytics · Team overview", "phase": 0, "box": [ 1.1, 63.919999999999995, 14.1, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Usage data and measurement plan" ], "actions": [ "Measure product behavior and outcomes" ], "outputs": [ "Analytics and product insights" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Data / Analytics", "id": "10-185" }, { "label": "Security / Compliance · Team overview", "phase": 0, "box": [ 1.1, 69.10999999999999, 14.1, 5.1899999999999995 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Data flows and risk obligations" ], "actions": [ "Manage security, privacy and compliance risk" ], "outputs": [ "Risk controls and compliance evidence" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Security / Compliance", "id": "10-186" } ] }, "navigationLabel": "Team Matrix" }, { "id": 11, "title": "Team Involvement Across the SaaS Product Development Lifecycle", "category": "Teams & Collaboration", "image": "/images/pdlc/11-team-heatmap.png", "tab": 3, "type": "original", "interactiveRegions": 186, "artwork": { "width": 753, "height": 424, "regions": [ { "label": "Founder / Strategy · Idea", "phase": 0, "box": [ 12.217795484727755, 16.037735849056602, 5.444887118193891, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "set strategic boundaries" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "sourceStage": "Idea", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-1" }, { "label": "Founder / Strategy · Research", "phase": 0, "box": [ 17.66268260292165, 16.037735849056602, 5.444887118193891, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "set strategic boundaries" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "sourceStage": "Research", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "11-2" }, { "label": "Founder / Strategy · Validation", "phase": 0, "box": [ 23.107569721115535, 16.037735849056602, 5.577689243027888, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "set strategic boundaries" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "sourceStage": "Validation", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-3" }, { "label": "Founder / Strategy · Strategy", "phase": 1, "box": [ 28.68525896414343, 16.037735849056602, 5.3120849933598935, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "review investment case" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "sourceStage": "Strategy", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-4" }, { "label": "Founder / Strategy · MVP Scope", "phase": 1, "box": [ 33.99734395750332, 16.037735849056602, 5.179282868525896, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "review investment case" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "sourceStage": "MVP Scope", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "11-5" }, { "label": "Founder / Strategy · Requirements", "phase": 2, "box": [ 39.176626826029214, 16.037735849056602, 6.507304116865869, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "review trade-offs" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "sourceStage": "Requirements", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "11-6" }, { "label": "Founder / Strategy · Design", "phase": 2, "box": [ 45.68393094289508, 16.037735849056602, 5.710491367861885, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "review trade-offs" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "sourceStage": "Design", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-7" }, { "label": "Founder / Strategy · Architecture", "phase": 2, "box": [ 51.39442231075697, 16.037735849056602, 5.843293492695882, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "review trade-offs" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "sourceStage": "Architecture", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "11-8" }, { "label": "Founder / Strategy · Build", "phase": 3, "box": [ 57.23771580345286, 16.037735849056602, 5.577689243027888, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "resolve escalations" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "sourceStage": "Build", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "11-9" }, { "label": "Founder / Strategy · Test", "phase": 4, "box": [ 62.81540504648074, 16.037735849056602, 4.51527224435591, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "review business readiness" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "sourceStage": "Test", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "11-10" }, { "label": "Founder / Strategy · UAT", "phase": 4, "box": [ 67.33067729083665, 16.037735849056602, 4.780876494023905, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "review business readiness" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "sourceStage": "UAT", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-11" }, { "label": "Founder / Strategy · Launch", "phase": 5, "box": [ 72.11155378486056, 16.037735849056602, 5.444887118193891, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "sponsor release" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "sourceStage": "Launch", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "11-12" }, { "label": "Founder / Strategy · Feedback", "phase": 6, "box": [ 77.55644090305445, 16.037735849056602, 5.843293492695882, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "review performance" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "sourceStage": "Feedback", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "11-13" }, { "label": "Founder / Strategy · Optimize", "phase": 6, "box": [ 83.39973439575033, 16.037735849056602, 5.710491367861885, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "review performance" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "sourceStage": "Optimize", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-14" }, { "label": "Founder / Strategy · Scale", "phase": 7, "box": [ 89.11022576361222, 16.037735849056602, 5.179282868525896, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "decide long-term investment" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "sourceStage": "Scale", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-15" }, { "label": "Founder / Strategy · Maintain", "phase": 7, "box": [ 94.28950863213812, 16.037735849056602, 4.913678618857902, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "decide long-term investment" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "sourceStage": "Maintain", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-16" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · Idea", "phase": 0, "box": [ 12.217795484727755, 22.40566037735849, 5.444887118193891, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "frame the opportunity" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "sourceStage": "Idea", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-17" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · Research", "phase": 0, "box": [ 17.66268260292165, 22.40566037735849, 5.444887118193891, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "frame the opportunity" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "sourceStage": "Research", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-18" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · Validation", "phase": 0, "box": [ 23.107569721115535, 22.40566037735849, 5.577689243027888, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "frame the opportunity" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "sourceStage": "Validation", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-19" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · Strategy", "phase": 1, "box": [ 28.68525896414343, 22.40566037735849, 5.3120849933598935, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "define outcomes and scope" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "sourceStage": "Strategy", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-20" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · MVP Scope", "phase": 1, "box": [ 33.99734395750332, 22.40566037735849, 5.179282868525896, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "define outcomes and scope" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "sourceStage": "MVP Scope", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-21" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · Requirements", "phase": 2, "box": [ 39.176626826029214, 22.40566037735849, 6.507304116865869, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "refine product requirements" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "sourceStage": "Requirements", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-22" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · Design", "phase": 2, "box": [ 45.68393094289508, 22.40566037735849, 5.710491367861885, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "refine product requirements" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "sourceStage": "Design", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-23" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · Architecture", "phase": 2, "box": [ 51.39442231075697, 22.40566037735849, 5.843293492695882, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "refine product requirements" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "sourceStage": "Architecture", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-24" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · Build", "phase": 3, "box": [ 57.23771580345286, 22.40566037735849, 5.577689243027888, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "prioritize and clarify backlog" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "sourceStage": "Build", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-25" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · Test", "phase": 4, "box": [ 62.81540504648074, 22.40566037735849, 4.51527224435591, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "review product acceptance" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "sourceStage": "Test", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-26" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · UAT", "phase": 4, "box": [ 67.33067729083665, 22.40566037735849, 4.780876494023905, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "review product acceptance" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "sourceStage": "UAT", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-27" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · Launch", "phase": 5, "box": [ 72.11155378486056, 22.40566037735849, 5.444887118193891, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "coordinate launch" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "sourceStage": "Launch", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-28" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · Feedback", "phase": 6, "box": [ 77.55644090305445, 22.40566037735849, 5.843293492695882, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "prioritize improvements" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "sourceStage": "Feedback", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-29" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · Optimize", "phase": 6, "box": [ 83.39973439575033, 22.40566037735849, 5.710491367861885, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "prioritize improvements" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "sourceStage": "Optimize", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-30" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · Scale", "phase": 7, "box": [ 89.11022576361222, 22.40566037735849, 5.179282868525896, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "own lifecycle roadmap" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "sourceStage": "Scale", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-31" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · Maintain", "phase": 7, "box": [ 94.28950863213812, 22.40566037735849, 4.913678618857902, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "own lifecycle roadmap" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "sourceStage": "Maintain", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-32" }, { "label": "Design · Idea", "phase": 0, "box": [ 12.217795484727755, 28.537735849056606, 5.444887118193891, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "map current journeys" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Design", "sourceStage": "Idea", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "11-33" }, { "label": "Design · Research", "phase": 0, "box": [ 17.66268260292165, 28.537735849056606, 5.444887118193891, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "map current journeys" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Design", "sourceStage": "Research", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "11-34" }, { "label": "Design · Validation", "phase": 0, "box": [ 23.107569721115535, 28.537735849056606, 5.577689243027888, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "map current journeys" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Design", "sourceStage": "Validation", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "11-35" }, { "label": "Design · Strategy", "phase": 1, "box": [ 28.68525896414343, 28.537735849056606, 5.3120849933598935, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "shape solution concepts" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Design", "sourceStage": "Strategy", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "11-36" }, { "label": "Design · MVP Scope", "phase": 1, "box": [ 33.99734395750332, 28.537735849056606, 5.179282868525896, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "shape solution concepts" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Design", "sourceStage": "MVP Scope", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "11-37" }, { "label": "Design · Requirements", "phase": 2, "box": [ 39.176626826029214, 28.537735849056606, 6.507304116865869, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "design user flows" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Design", "sourceStage": "Requirements", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-38" }, { "label": "Design · Design", "phase": 2, "box": [ 45.68393094289508, 28.537735849056606, 5.710491367861885, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "design user flows" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Design", "sourceStage": "Design", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "11-39" }, { "label": "Design · Architecture", "phase": 2, "box": [ 51.39442231075697, 28.537735849056606, 5.843293492695882, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "design user flows" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Design", "sourceStage": "Architecture", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "11-40" }, { "label": "Design · Build", "phase": 3, "box": [ 57.23771580345286, 28.537735849056606, 5.577689243027888, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "review implementation fidelity" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Design", "sourceStage": "Build", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "11-41" }, { "label": "Design · Test", "phase": 4, "box": [ 62.81540504648074, 28.537735849056606, 4.51527224435591, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "verify UX quality" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Design", "sourceStage": "Test", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "11-42" }, { "label": "Design · UAT", "phase": 4, "box": [ 67.33067729083665, 28.537735849056606, 4.780876494023905, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "verify UX quality" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Design", "sourceStage": "UAT", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "11-43" }, { "label": "Design · Launch", "phase": 5, "box": [ 72.11155378486056, 28.537735849056606, 5.444887118193891, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "address UX friction" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Design", "sourceStage": "Launch", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "11-44" }, { "label": "Design · Feedback", "phase": 6, "box": [ 77.55644090305445, 28.537735849056606, 5.843293492695882, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "refine experiences" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Design", "sourceStage": "Feedback", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "11-45" }, { "label": "Design · Optimize", "phase": 6, "box": [ 83.39973439575033, 28.537735849056606, 5.710491367861885, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "refine experiences" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Design", "sourceStage": "Optimize", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "11-46" }, { "label": "Design · Scale", "phase": 7, "box": [ 89.11022576361222, 28.537735849056606, 5.179282868525896, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "extend design system" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Design", "sourceStage": "Scale", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "11-47" }, { "label": "Design · Maintain", "phase": 7, "box": [ 94.28950863213812, 28.537735849056606, 4.913678618857902, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "extend design system" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Design", "sourceStage": "Maintain", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "11-48" }, { "label": "Engineering · Idea", "phase": 0, "box": [ 12.217795484727755, 34.90566037735849, 5.444887118193891, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "assess feasibility" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Engineering", "sourceStage": "Idea", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-49" }, { "label": "Engineering · Research", "phase": 0, "box": [ 17.66268260292165, 34.90566037735849, 5.444887118193891, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "assess feasibility" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Engineering", "sourceStage": "Research", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-50" }, { "label": "Engineering · Validation", "phase": 0, "box": [ 23.107569721115535, 34.90566037735849, 5.577689243027888, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "assess feasibility" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Engineering", "sourceStage": "Validation", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-51" }, { "label": "Engineering · Strategy", "phase": 1, "box": [ 28.68525896414343, 34.90566037735849, 5.3120849933598935, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "estimate delivery" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Engineering", "sourceStage": "Strategy", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-52" }, { "label": "Engineering · MVP Scope", "phase": 1, "box": [ 33.99734395750332, 34.90566037735849, 5.179282868525896, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "estimate delivery" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Engineering", "sourceStage": "MVP Scope", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-53" }, { "label": "Engineering · Requirements", "phase": 2, "box": [ 39.176626826029214, 34.90566037735849, 6.507304116865869, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "review technical feasibility" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Engineering", "sourceStage": "Requirements", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-54" }, { "label": "Engineering · Design", "phase": 2, "box": [ 45.68393094289508, 34.90566037735849, 5.710491367861885, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "review technical feasibility" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Engineering", "sourceStage": "Design", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-55" }, { "label": "Engineering · Architecture", "phase": 2, "box": [ 51.39442231075697, 34.90566037735849, 5.843293492695882, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "review technical feasibility" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Engineering", "sourceStage": "Architecture", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-56" }, { "label": "Engineering · Build", "phase": 3, "box": [ 57.23771580345286, 34.90566037735849, 5.577689243027888, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "build features" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Engineering", "sourceStage": "Build", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-57" }, { "label": "Engineering · Test", "phase": 4, "box": [ 62.81540504648074, 34.90566037735849, 4.51527224435591, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "fix defects" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Engineering", "sourceStage": "Test", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-58" }, { "label": "Engineering · UAT", "phase": 4, "box": [ 67.33067729083665, 34.90566037735849, 4.780876494023905, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "fix defects" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Engineering", "sourceStage": "UAT", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-59" }, { "label": "Engineering · Launch", "phase": 5, "box": [ 72.11155378486056, 34.90566037735849, 5.444887118193891, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "release features" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Engineering", "sourceStage": "Launch", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-60" }, { "label": "Engineering · Feedback", "phase": 6, "box": [ 77.55644090305445, 34.90566037735849, 5.843293492695882, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "deliver enhancements" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Engineering", "sourceStage": "Feedback", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-61" }, { "label": "Engineering · Optimize", "phase": 6, "box": [ 83.39973439575033, 34.90566037735849, 5.710491367861885, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "deliver enhancements" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Engineering", "sourceStage": "Optimize", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-62" }, { "label": "Engineering · Scale", "phase": 7, "box": [ 89.11022576361222, 34.90566037735849, 5.179282868525896, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "maintain and scale software" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Engineering", "sourceStage": "Scale", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-63" }, { "label": "Engineering · Maintain", "phase": 7, "box": [ 94.28950863213812, 34.90566037735849, 4.913678618857902, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "maintain and scale software" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Engineering", "sourceStage": "Maintain", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-64" }, { "label": "QA · Idea", "phase": 0, "box": [ 12.217795484727755, 41.0377358490566, 5.444887118193891, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "analyze quality pain points" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "QA", "sourceStage": "Idea", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-65" }, { "label": "QA · Research", "phase": 0, "box": [ 17.66268260292165, 41.0377358490566, 5.444887118193891, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "analyze quality pain points" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "QA", "sourceStage": "Research", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-66" }, { "label": "QA · Validation", "phase": 0, "box": [ 23.107569721115535, 41.0377358490566, 5.577689243027888, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "analyze quality pain points" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "QA", "sourceStage": "Validation", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-67" }, { "label": "QA · Strategy", "phase": 1, "box": [ 28.68525896414343, 41.0377358490566, 5.3120849933598935, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "define test strategy" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "QA", "sourceStage": "Strategy", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-68" }, { "label": "QA · MVP Scope", "phase": 1, "box": [ 33.99734395750332, 41.0377358490566, 5.179282868525896, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "define test strategy" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "QA", "sourceStage": "MVP Scope", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-69" }, { "label": "QA · Requirements", "phase": 2, "box": [ 39.176626826029214, 41.0377358490566, 6.507304116865869, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "design test coverage" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "QA", "sourceStage": "Requirements", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-70" }, { "label": "QA · Design", "phase": 2, "box": [ 45.68393094289508, 41.0377358490566, 5.710491367861885, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "design test coverage" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "QA", "sourceStage": "Design", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-71" }, { "label": "QA · Architecture", "phase": 2, "box": [ 51.39442231075697, 41.0377358490566, 5.843293492695882, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "design test coverage" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "QA", "sourceStage": "Architecture", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-72" }, { "label": "QA · Build", "phase": 3, "box": [ 57.23771580345286, 41.0377358490566, 5.577689243027888, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "test increments" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "QA", "sourceStage": "Build", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-73" }, { "label": "QA · Test", "phase": 4, "box": [ 62.81540504648074, 41.0377358490566, 4.51527224435591, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "execute QA/UAT" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "QA", "sourceStage": "Test", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-74" }, { "label": "QA · UAT", "phase": 4, "box": [ 67.33067729083665, 41.0377358490566, 4.780876494023905, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "execute QA/UAT" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "QA", "sourceStage": "UAT", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-75" }, { "label": "QA · Launch", "phase": 5, "box": [ 72.11155378486056, 41.0377358490566, 5.444887118193891, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "run smoke tests" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "QA", "sourceStage": "Launch", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-76" }, { "label": "QA · Feedback", "phase": 6, "box": [ 77.55644090305445, 41.0377358490566, 5.843293492695882, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "expand regression tests" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "QA", "sourceStage": "Feedback", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-77" }, { "label": "QA · Optimize", "phase": 6, "box": [ 83.39973439575033, 41.0377358490566, 5.710491367861885, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "expand regression tests" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "QA", "sourceStage": "Optimize", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-78" }, { "label": "QA · Scale", "phase": 7, "box": [ 89.11022576361222, 41.0377358490566, 5.179282868525896, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "sustain quality automation" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "QA", "sourceStage": "Scale", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-79" }, { "label": "QA · Maintain", "phase": 7, "box": [ 94.28950863213812, 41.0377358490566, 4.913678618857902, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "sustain quality automation" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "QA", "sourceStage": "Maintain", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-80" }, { "label": "DevOps · Idea", "phase": 0, "box": [ 12.217795484727755, 47.16981132075472, 5.444887118193891, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "review operational constraints" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "DevOps", "sourceStage": "Idea", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-81" }, { "label": "DevOps · Research", "phase": 0, "box": [ 17.66268260292165, 47.16981132075472, 5.444887118193891, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "review operational constraints" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "DevOps", "sourceStage": "Research", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-82" }, { "label": "DevOps · Validation", "phase": 0, "box": [ 23.107569721115535, 47.16981132075472, 5.577689243027888, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "review operational constraints" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "DevOps", "sourceStage": "Validation", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-83" }, { "label": "DevOps · Strategy", "phase": 1, "box": [ 28.68525896414343, 47.16981132075472, 5.3120849933598935, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "define SLOs" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "DevOps", "sourceStage": "Strategy", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-84" }, { "label": "DevOps · MVP Scope", "phase": 1, "box": [ 33.99734395750332, 47.16981132075472, 5.179282868525896, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "define SLOs" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "DevOps", "sourceStage": "MVP Scope", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-85" }, { "label": "DevOps · Requirements", "phase": 2, "box": [ 39.176626826029214, 47.16981132075472, 6.507304116865869, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "plan environments" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "DevOps", "sourceStage": "Requirements", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-86" }, { "label": "DevOps · Design", "phase": 2, "box": [ 45.68393094289508, 47.16981132075472, 5.710491367861885, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "plan environments" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "DevOps", "sourceStage": "Design", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-87" }, { "label": "DevOps · Architecture", "phase": 2, "box": [ 51.39442231075697, 47.16981132075472, 5.843293492695882, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "plan environments" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "DevOps", "sourceStage": "Architecture", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-88" }, { "label": "DevOps · Build", "phase": 3, "box": [ 57.23771580345286, 47.16981132075472, 5.577689243027888, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "configure CI/CD" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "DevOps", "sourceStage": "Build", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-89" }, { "label": "DevOps · Test", "phase": 4, "box": [ 62.81540504648074, 47.16981132075472, 4.51527224435591, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "test rollback" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "DevOps", "sourceStage": "Test", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-90" }, { "label": "DevOps · UAT", "phase": 4, "box": [ 67.33067729083665, 47.16981132075472, 4.780876494023905, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "test rollback" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "DevOps", "sourceStage": "UAT", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-91" }, { "label": "DevOps · Launch", "phase": 5, "box": [ 72.11155378486056, 47.16981132075472, 5.444887118193891, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "operate rollout" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "DevOps", "sourceStage": "Launch", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-92" }, { "label": "DevOps · Feedback", "phase": 6, "box": [ 77.55644090305445, 47.16981132075472, 5.843293492695882, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "reduce incidents" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "DevOps", "sourceStage": "Feedback", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-93" }, { "label": "DevOps · Optimize", "phase": 6, "box": [ 83.39973439575033, 47.16981132075472, 5.710491367861885, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "reduce incidents" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "DevOps", "sourceStage": "Optimize", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-94" }, { "label": "DevOps · Scale", "phase": 7, "box": [ 89.11022576361222, 47.16981132075472, 5.179282868525896, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "plan capacity" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "DevOps", "sourceStage": "Scale", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-95" }, { "label": "DevOps · Maintain", "phase": 7, "box": [ 94.28950863213812, 47.16981132075472, 4.913678618857902, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "plan capacity" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "DevOps", "sourceStage": "Maintain", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-96" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · Idea", "phase": 0, "box": [ 12.217795484727755, 53.301886792452834, 5.444887118193891, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "identify support themes" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "sourceStage": "Idea", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-97" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · Research", "phase": 0, "box": [ 17.66268260292165, 53.301886792452834, 5.444887118193891, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "identify support themes" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "sourceStage": "Research", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-98" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · Validation", "phase": 0, "box": [ 23.107569721115535, 53.301886792452834, 5.577689243027888, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "identify support themes" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "sourceStage": "Validation", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-99" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · Strategy", "phase": 1, "box": [ 28.68525896414343, 53.301886792452834, 5.3120849933598935, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "define onboarding needs" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "sourceStage": "Strategy", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-100" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · MVP Scope", "phase": 1, "box": [ 33.99734395750332, 53.301886792452834, 5.179282868525896, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "define onboarding needs" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "sourceStage": "MVP Scope", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-101" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · Requirements", "phase": 2, "box": [ 39.176626826029214, 53.301886792452834, 6.507304116865869, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "design support journeys" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "sourceStage": "Requirements", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-102" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · Design", "phase": 2, "box": [ 45.68393094289508, 53.301886792452834, 5.710491367861885, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "design support journeys" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "sourceStage": "Design", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-103" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · Architecture", "phase": 2, "box": [ 51.39442231075697, 53.301886792452834, 5.843293492695882, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "design support journeys" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "sourceStage": "Architecture", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-104" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · Build", "phase": 3, "box": [ 57.23771580345286, 53.301886792452834, 5.577689243027888, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "draft help content" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "sourceStage": "Build", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-105" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · Test", "phase": 4, "box": [ 62.81540504648074, 53.301886792452834, 4.51527224435591, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "test onboarding" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "sourceStage": "Test", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-106" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · UAT", "phase": 4, "box": [ 67.33067729083665, 53.301886792452834, 4.780876494023905, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "test onboarding" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "sourceStage": "UAT", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-107" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · Launch", "phase": 5, "box": [ 72.11155378486056, 53.301886792452834, 5.444887118193891, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "onboard customers" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "sourceStage": "Launch", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-108" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · Feedback", "phase": 6, "box": [ 77.55644090305445, 53.301886792452834, 5.843293492695882, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "improve adoption" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "sourceStage": "Feedback", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-109" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · Optimize", "phase": 6, "box": [ 83.39973439575033, 53.301886792452834, 5.710491367861885, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "improve adoption" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "sourceStage": "Optimize", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-110" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · Scale", "phase": 7, "box": [ 89.11022576361222, 53.301886792452834, 5.179282868525896, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "manage retention" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "sourceStage": "Scale", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-111" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · Maintain", "phase": 7, "box": [ 94.28950863213812, 53.301886792452834, 4.913678618857902, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "manage retention" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "sourceStage": "Maintain", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-112" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · Idea", "phase": 0, "box": [ 12.217795484727755, 59.66981132075472, 5.444887118193891, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "analyze market segments" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "sourceStage": "Idea", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "11-113" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · Research", "phase": 0, "box": [ 17.66268260292165, 59.66981132075472, 5.444887118193891, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "analyze market segments" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "sourceStage": "Research", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "11-114" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · Validation", "phase": 0, "box": [ 23.107569721115535, 59.66981132075472, 5.577689243027888, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "analyze market segments" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "sourceStage": "Validation", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "11-115" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · Strategy", "phase": 1, "box": [ 28.68525896414343, 59.66981132075472, 5.3120849933598935, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "define positioning" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "sourceStage": "Strategy", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "11-116" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · MVP Scope", "phase": 1, "box": [ 33.99734395750332, 59.66981132075472, 5.179282868525896, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "define positioning" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "sourceStage": "MVP Scope", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "11-117" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · Requirements", "phase": 2, "box": [ 39.176626826029214, 59.66981132075472, 6.507304116865869, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "review messaging" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "sourceStage": "Requirements", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "11-118" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · Design", "phase": 2, "box": [ 45.68393094289508, 59.66981132075472, 5.710491367861885, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "review messaging" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "sourceStage": "Design", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "11-119" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · Architecture", "phase": 2, "box": [ 51.39442231075697, 59.66981132075472, 5.843293492695882, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "review messaging" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "sourceStage": "Architecture", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "11-120" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · Build", "phase": 3, "box": [ 57.23771580345286, 59.66981132075472, 5.577689243027888, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "prepare launch assets" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "sourceStage": "Build", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "11-121" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · Test", "phase": 4, "box": [ 62.81540504648074, 59.66981132075472, 4.51527224435591, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "verify claims" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "sourceStage": "Test", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "11-122" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · UAT", "phase": 4, "box": [ 67.33067729083665, 59.66981132075472, 4.780876494023905, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "verify claims" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "sourceStage": "UAT", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "11-123" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · Launch", "phase": 5, "box": [ 72.11155378486056, 59.66981132075472, 5.444887118193891, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "run campaigns" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "sourceStage": "Launch", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-124" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · Feedback", "phase": 6, "box": [ 77.55644090305445, 59.66981132075472, 5.843293492695882, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "optimize messaging" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "sourceStage": "Feedback", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-125" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · Optimize", "phase": 6, "box": [ 83.39973439575033, 59.66981132075472, 5.710491367861885, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "optimize messaging" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "sourceStage": "Optimize", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-126" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · Scale", "phase": 7, "box": [ 89.11022576361222, 59.66981132075472, 5.179282868525896, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "support expansion" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "sourceStage": "Scale", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-127" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · Maintain", "phase": 7, "box": [ 94.28950863213812, 59.66981132075472, 4.913678618857902, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "support expansion" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "sourceStage": "Maintain", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "11-128" }, { "label": "Data / Analytics · Idea", "phase": 0, "box": [ 12.217795484727755, 66.0377358490566, 5.444887118193891, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Usage data and measurement plan" ], "actions": [ "establish metric baselines" ], "outputs": [ "Analytics and product insights" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Data / Analytics", "sourceStage": "Idea", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-129" }, { "label": "Data / Analytics · Research", "phase": 0, "box": [ 17.66268260292165, 66.0377358490566, 5.444887118193891, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Usage data and measurement plan" ], "actions": [ "establish metric baselines" ], "outputs": [ "Analytics and product insights" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Data / Analytics", "sourceStage": "Research", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-130" }, { "label": "Data / Analytics · Validation", "phase": 0, "box": [ 23.107569721115535, 66.0377358490566, 5.577689243027888, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Usage data and measurement plan" ], "actions": [ "establish metric baselines" ], "outputs": [ "Analytics and product insights" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Data / Analytics", "sourceStage": "Validation", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-131" }, { "label": "Data / Analytics · Strategy", "phase": 1, "box": [ 28.68525896414343, 66.0377358490566, 5.3120849933598935, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Usage data and measurement plan" ], "actions": [ "define KPIs" ], "outputs": [ "Analytics and product insights" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Data / Analytics", "sourceStage": "Strategy", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-132" }, { "label": "Data / Analytics · MVP Scope", "phase": 1, "box": [ 33.99734395750332, 66.0377358490566, 5.179282868525896, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Usage data and measurement plan" ], "actions": [ "define KPIs" ], "outputs": [ "Analytics and product insights" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Data / Analytics", "sourceStage": "MVP Scope", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-133" }, { "label": "Data / Analytics · Requirements", "phase": 2, "box": [ 39.176626826029214, 66.0377358490566, 6.507304116865869, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Usage data and measurement plan" ], "actions": [ "specify event tracking" ], "outputs": [ "Analytics and product insights" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Data / Analytics", "sourceStage": "Requirements", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-134" }, { "label": "Data / Analytics · Design", "phase": 2, "box": [ 45.68393094289508, 66.0377358490566, 5.710491367861885, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Usage data and measurement plan" ], "actions": [ "specify event tracking" ], "outputs": [ "Analytics and product insights" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Data / Analytics", "sourceStage": "Design", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-135" }, { "label": "Data / Analytics · Architecture", "phase": 2, "box": [ 51.39442231075697, 66.0377358490566, 5.843293492695882, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Usage data and measurement plan" ], "actions": [ "specify event tracking" ], "outputs": [ "Analytics and product insights" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Data / Analytics", "sourceStage": "Architecture", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-136" }, { "label": "Data / Analytics · Build", "phase": 3, "box": [ 57.23771580345286, 66.0377358490566, 5.577689243027888, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Usage data and measurement plan" ], "actions": [ "implement instrumentation" ], "outputs": [ "Analytics and product insights" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Data / Analytics", "sourceStage": "Build", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-137" }, { "label": "Data / Analytics · Test", "phase": 4, "box": [ 62.81540504648074, 66.0377358490566, 4.51527224435591, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Usage data and measurement plan" ], "actions": [ "verify data quality" ], "outputs": [ "Analytics and product insights" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Data / Analytics", "sourceStage": "Test", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "11-138" }, { "label": "Data / Analytics · UAT", "phase": 4, "box": [ 67.33067729083665, 66.0377358490566, 4.780876494023905, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Usage data and measurement plan" ], "actions": [ "verify data quality" ], "outputs": [ "Analytics and product insights" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Data / Analytics", "sourceStage": "UAT", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-139" }, { "label": "Data / Analytics · Launch", "phase": 5, "box": [ 72.11155378486056, 66.0377358490566, 5.444887118193891, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Usage data and measurement plan" ], "actions": [ "monitor activation" ], "outputs": [ "Analytics and product insights" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Data / Analytics", "sourceStage": "Launch", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-140" }, { "label": "Data / Analytics · Feedback", "phase": 6, "box": [ 77.55644090305445, 66.0377358490566, 5.843293492695882, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Usage data and measurement plan" ], "actions": [ "analyze cohorts" ], "outputs": [ "Analytics and product insights" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Data / Analytics", "sourceStage": "Feedback", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-141" }, { "label": "Data / Analytics · Optimize", "phase": 6, "box": [ 83.39973439575033, 66.0377358490566, 5.710491367861885, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Usage data and measurement plan" ], "actions": [ "analyze cohorts" ], "outputs": [ "Analytics and product insights" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Data / Analytics", "sourceStage": "Optimize", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-142" }, { "label": "Data / Analytics · Scale", "phase": 7, "box": [ 89.11022576361222, 66.0377358490566, 5.179282868525896, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Usage data and measurement plan" ], "actions": [ "monitor product health" ], "outputs": [ "Analytics and product insights" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Data / Analytics", "sourceStage": "Scale", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-143" }, { "label": "Data / Analytics · Maintain", "phase": 7, "box": [ 94.28950863213812, 66.0377358490566, 4.913678618857902, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Usage data and measurement plan" ], "actions": [ "monitor product health" ], "outputs": [ "Analytics and product insights" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Data / Analytics", "sourceStage": "Maintain", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-144" }, { "label": "Security / Compliance · Idea", "phase": 0, "box": [ 12.217795484727755, 72.40566037735849, 5.444887118193891, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Data flows and risk obligations" ], "actions": [ "identify early risks" ], "outputs": [ "Risk controls and compliance evidence" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Security / Compliance", "sourceStage": "Idea", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-145" }, { "label": "Security / Compliance · Research", "phase": 0, "box": [ 17.66268260292165, 72.40566037735849, 5.444887118193891, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Data flows and risk obligations" ], "actions": [ "identify early risks" ], "outputs": [ "Risk controls and compliance evidence" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Security / Compliance", "sourceStage": "Research", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-146" }, { "label": "Security / Compliance · Validation", "phase": 0, "box": [ 23.107569721115535, 72.40566037735849, 5.577689243027888, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Data flows and risk obligations" ], "actions": [ "identify early risks" ], "outputs": [ "Risk controls and compliance evidence" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Security / Compliance", "sourceStage": "Validation", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-147" }, { "label": "Security / Compliance · Strategy", "phase": 1, "box": [ 28.68525896414343, 72.40566037735849, 5.3120849933598935, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Data flows and risk obligations" ], "actions": [ "specify controls" ], "outputs": [ "Risk controls and compliance evidence" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Security / Compliance", "sourceStage": "Strategy", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-148" }, { "label": "Security / Compliance · MVP Scope", "phase": 1, "box": [ 33.99734395750332, 72.40566037735849, 5.179282868525896, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Data flows and risk obligations" ], "actions": [ "specify controls" ], "outputs": [ "Risk controls and compliance evidence" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Security / Compliance", "sourceStage": "MVP Scope", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-149" }, { "label": "Security / Compliance · Requirements", "phase": 2, "box": [ 39.176626826029214, 72.40566037735849, 6.507304116865869, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Data flows and risk obligations" ], "actions": [ "review threat model" ], "outputs": [ "Risk controls and compliance evidence" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Security / Compliance", "sourceStage": "Requirements", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-150" }, { "label": "Security / Compliance · Design", "phase": 2, "box": [ 45.68393094289508, 72.40566037735849, 5.710491367861885, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Data flows and risk obligations" ], "actions": [ "review threat model" ], "outputs": [ "Risk controls and compliance evidence" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Security / Compliance", "sourceStage": "Design", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-151" }, { "label": "Security / Compliance · Architecture", "phase": 2, "box": [ 51.39442231075697, 72.40566037735849, 5.843293492695882, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Data flows and risk obligations" ], "actions": [ "review threat model" ], "outputs": [ "Risk controls and compliance evidence" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Security / Compliance", "sourceStage": "Architecture", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-152" }, { "label": "Security / Compliance · Build", "phase": 3, "box": [ 57.23771580345286, 72.40566037735849, 5.577689243027888, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Data flows and risk obligations" ], "actions": [ "scan vulnerabilities" ], "outputs": [ "Risk controls and compliance evidence" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Security / Compliance", "sourceStage": "Build", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-153" }, { "label": "Security / Compliance · Test", "phase": 4, "box": [ 62.81540504648074, 72.40566037735849, 4.51527224435591, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Data flows and risk obligations" ], "actions": [ "test safeguards" ], "outputs": [ "Risk controls and compliance evidence" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Security / Compliance", "sourceStage": "Test", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-154" }, { "label": "Security / Compliance · UAT", "phase": 4, "box": [ 67.33067729083665, 72.40566037735849, 4.780876494023905, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Data flows and risk obligations" ], "actions": [ "test safeguards" ], "outputs": [ "Risk controls and compliance evidence" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Security / Compliance", "sourceStage": "UAT", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-155" }, { "label": "Security / Compliance · Launch", "phase": 5, "box": [ 72.11155378486056, 72.40566037735849, 5.444887118193891, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Data flows and risk obligations" ], "actions": [ "verify controls" ], "outputs": [ "Risk controls and compliance evidence" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Security / Compliance", "sourceStage": "Launch", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-156" }, { "label": "Security / Compliance · Feedback", "phase": 6, "box": [ 77.55644090305445, 72.40566037735849, 5.843293492695882, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Data flows and risk obligations" ], "actions": [ "review emerging risks" ], "outputs": [ "Risk controls and compliance evidence" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Security / Compliance", "sourceStage": "Feedback", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-157" }, { "label": "Security / Compliance · Optimize", "phase": 6, "box": [ 83.39973439575033, 72.40566037735849, 5.710491367861885, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Data flows and risk obligations" ], "actions": [ "review emerging risks" ], "outputs": [ "Risk controls and compliance evidence" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Security / Compliance", "sourceStage": "Optimize", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-158" }, { "label": "Security / Compliance · Scale", "phase": 7, "box": [ 89.11022576361222, 72.40566037735849, 5.179282868525896, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Data flows and risk obligations" ], "actions": [ "maintain controls" ], "outputs": [ "Risk controls and compliance evidence" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Security / Compliance", "sourceStage": "Scale", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "11-159" }, { "label": "Security / Compliance · Maintain", "phase": 7, "box": [ 94.28950863213812, 72.40566037735849, 4.913678618857902, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Data flows and risk obligations" ], "actions": [ "maintain controls" ], "outputs": [ "Risk controls and compliance evidence" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Team/stage axes and participation read from the original matrix dot fill; activity, input and output use the normalized team reference.", "team": "Security / Compliance", "sourceStage": "Maintain", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "11-160" }, { "label": "Idea · Stage header", "phase": 0, "box": [ 12.217795484727755, 11, 5.444887118193891, 5 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Interview customers and stakeholders", "Synthesize evidence", "Frame the opportunity", "Validate problem assumptions" ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Problem statement", "Research findings", "Initial success measures" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "11-161" }, { "label": "Research · Stage header", "phase": 0, "box": [ 17.66268260292165, 11, 5.444887118193891, 5 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Interview customers and stakeholders", "Synthesize evidence", "Frame the opportunity", "Validate problem assumptions" ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Problem statement", "Research findings", "Initial success measures" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "11-162" }, { "label": "Validation · Stage header", "phase": 0, "box": [ 23.107569721115535, 11, 5.577689243027888, 5 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Interview customers and stakeholders", "Synthesize evidence", "Frame the opportunity", "Validate problem assumptions" ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Problem statement", "Research findings", "Initial success measures" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "11-163" }, { "label": "Strategy · Stage header", "phase": 1, "box": [ 28.68525896414343, 11, 5.3120849933598935, 5 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Define outcomes and MVP", "Prioritize requirements", "Assess feasibility and ROI", "Align stakeholders" ], "outputs": [ "Product strategy", "Prioritized roadmap", "MVP scope", "Success metrics" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "11-164" }, { "label": "MVP Scope · Stage header", "phase": 1, "box": [ 33.99734395750332, 11, 5.179282868525896, 5 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Define outcomes and MVP", "Prioritize requirements", "Assess feasibility and ROI", "Align stakeholders" ], "outputs": [ "Product strategy", "Prioritized roadmap", "MVP scope", "Success metrics" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "11-165" }, { "label": "Requirements · Stage header", "phase": 2, "box": [ 39.176626826029214, 11, 6.507304116865869, 5 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Prototype experiences", "Design integrations", "Test concepts", "Refine acceptance criteria" ], "outputs": [ "UX prototypes", "Technical design", "User stories", "Test scenarios" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "11-166" }, { "label": "Design · Stage header", "phase": 2, "box": [ 45.68393094289508, 11, 5.710491367861885, 5 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Prototype experiences", "Design integrations", "Test concepts", "Refine acceptance criteria" ], "outputs": [ "UX prototypes", "Technical design", "User stories", "Test scenarios" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "11-167" }, { "label": "Architecture · Stage header", "phase": 2, "box": [ 51.39442231075697, 11, 5.843293492695882, 5 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Prototype experiences", "Design integrations", "Test concepts", "Refine acceptance criteria" ], "outputs": [ "UX prototypes", "Technical design", "User stories", "Test scenarios" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "11-168" }, { "label": "Build · Stage header", "phase": 3, "box": [ 57.23771580345286, 11, 5.577689243027888, 5 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Approved designs", "Prioritized backlog", "API contracts", "Acceptance criteria" ], "actions": [ "Build and integrate features", "Review increments", "Resolve trade-offs", "Instrument analytics" ], "outputs": [ "Working increments", "Source code", "Integrated services", "Updated documentation" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "11-169" }, { "label": "Test · Stage header", "phase": 4, "box": [ 62.81540504648074, 11, 4.51527224435591, 5 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Release candidate", "Test plan", "Acceptance criteria", "Risk controls" ], "actions": [ "Run QA and UAT", "Validate analytics", "Review security", "Resolve critical defects" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence", "UAT results", "Release readiness", "Remediation list" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "11-170" }, { "label": "UAT · Stage header", "phase": 4, "box": [ 67.33067729083665, 11, 4.780876494023905, 5 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Release candidate", "Test plan", "Acceptance criteria", "Risk controls" ], "actions": [ "Run QA and UAT", "Validate analytics", "Review security", "Resolve critical defects" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence", "UAT results", "Release readiness", "Remediation list" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "11-171" }, { "label": "Launch · Stage header", "phase": 5, "box": [ 72.11155378486056, 11, 5.444887118193891, 5 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Approved release", "Launch plan", "Training materials", "Operational runbooks" ], "actions": [ "Coordinate rollout", "Enable sales and support", "Monitor incidents", "Measure activation" ], "outputs": [ "Production release", "Release notes", "Launch communications", "Early adoption dashboard" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "11-172" }, { "label": "Feedback · Stage header", "phase": 6, "box": [ 77.55644090305445, 11, 5.843293492695882, 5 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Product analytics", "Customer feedback", "Support trends", "Experiment results" ], "actions": [ "Analyze behavior", "Prioritize improvements", "Run experiments", "Update roadmap" ], "outputs": [ "Improvement backlog", "Experiment insights", "Updated roadmap", "Product health review" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "11-173" }, { "label": "Optimize · Stage header", "phase": 6, "box": [ 83.39973439575033, 11, 5.710491367861885, 5 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Product analytics", "Customer feedback", "Support trends", "Experiment results" ], "actions": [ "Analyze behavior", "Prioritize improvements", "Run experiments", "Update roadmap" ], "outputs": [ "Improvement backlog", "Experiment insights", "Updated roadmap", "Product health review" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "11-174" }, { "label": "Scale · Stage header", "phase": 7, "box": [ 89.11022576361222, 11, 5.179282868525896, 5 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Growth signals", "Service health", "Unit economics", "Technical debt" ], "actions": [ "Plan capacity", "Optimize reliability", "Expand markets", "Review lifecycle investments" ], "outputs": [ "Scale roadmap", "Capacity plan", "Sustainability review", "Retirement plan if needed" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "11-175" }, { "label": "Maintain · Stage header", "phase": 7, "box": [ 94.28950863213812, 11, 4.913678618857902, 5 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Growth signals", "Service health", "Unit economics", "Technical debt" ], "actions": [ "Plan capacity", "Optimize reliability", "Expand markets", "Review lifecycle investments" ], "outputs": [ "Scale roadmap", "Capacity plan", "Sustainability review", "Retirement plan if needed" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "11-176" }, { "label": "Founder / Strategy · Team overview", "phase": 0, "box": [ 1.8, 16.037735849056602, 10.5, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "Align business strategy and investment" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "id": "11-177" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · Team overview", "phase": 0, "box": [ 1.8, 22.40566037735849, 10.5, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "Lead product direction and decisions" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "id": "11-178" }, { "label": "Design · Team overview", "phase": 0, "box": [ 1.8, 28.537735849056606, 10.5, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "Design and refine user experiences" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Design", "id": "11-179" }, { "label": "Engineering · Team overview", "phase": 0, "box": [ 1.8, 34.90566037735849, 10.5, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "Implement and integrate the solution" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Engineering", "id": "11-180" }, { "label": "QA · Team overview", "phase": 0, "box": [ 1.8, 41.0377358490566, 10.5, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "Verify quality and acceptance criteria" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "QA", "id": "11-181" }, { "label": "DevOps · Team overview", "phase": 0, "box": [ 1.8, 47.16981132075472, 10.5, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "Ensure deployment and operational reliability" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "DevOps", "id": "11-182" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · Team overview", "phase": 0, "box": [ 1.8, 53.301886792452834, 10.5, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "Enable adoption and support customers" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "id": "11-183" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · Team overview", "phase": 0, "box": [ 1.8, 59.66981132075472, 10.5, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "Shape positioning and market communications" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "id": "11-184" }, { "label": "Data / Analytics · Team overview", "phase": 0, "box": [ 1.8, 66.0377358490566, 10.5, 6.367924528301887 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Usage data and measurement plan" ], "actions": [ "Measure product behavior and outcomes" ], "outputs": [ "Analytics and product insights" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Data / Analytics", "id": "11-185" }, { "label": "Security / Compliance · Team overview", "phase": 0, "box": [ 1.8, 72.40566037735849, 10.5, 6.132075471698113 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Data flows and risk obligations" ], "actions": [ "Manage security, privacy and compliance risk" ], "outputs": [ "Risk controls and compliance evidence" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Security / Compliance", "id": "11-186" } ] }, "navigationLabel": "Team Heatmap" }, { "id": 12, "title": "How Work Flows Across a SaaS Product Team", "category": "Teams & Collaboration", "image": "/images/pdlc/12-team-workflow.png", "tab": 4, "type": "original", "interactiveRegions": 11, "artwork": { "width": 1491, "height": 1055, "regions": [ { "label": "Founder Vision / Market Need", "phase": 0, "box": [ 1.7, 10, 10.422, 53.2 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Business idea", "Customer problem", "Market gap" ], "actions": [ "Define business direction" ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity statement", "Problem hypothesis" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Inputs, activity and outputs transcribed from this workflow; gate and measures use the normalized phase reference.", "id": "12-1" }, { "label": "Product Strategy", "phase": 1, "box": [ 12.422, 10, 10.422, 53.2 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Business idea", "Market opportunity", "Customer problem" ], "actions": [ "Define product direction and business goals" ], "outputs": [ "Product vision", "Roadmap", "Success metrics" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Inputs, activity and outputs transcribed from this workflow; gate and measures use the normalized phase reference.", "id": "12-2" }, { "label": "Requirements", "phase": 2, "box": [ 23.144, 10, 10.422, 53.2 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Product vision", "Roadmap", "Customer needs" ], "actions": [ "Convert business needs into buildable requirements" ], "outputs": [ "PRD", "Epics", "User stories", "Acceptance criteria" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Inputs, activity and outputs transcribed from this workflow; gate and measures use the normalized phase reference.", "id": "12-3" }, { "label": "Design", "phase": 2, "box": [ 33.867, 10, 10.422, 53.2 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Requirements", "Personas", "Workflows" ], "actions": [ "Design user experience and interface" ], "outputs": [ "User flows", "Wireframes", "Prototypes", "UI screens" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Inputs, activity and outputs transcribed from this workflow; gate and measures use the normalized phase reference.", "id": "12-4" }, { "label": "Development", "phase": 3, "box": [ 44.589, 10, 10.422, 53.2 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "User stories", "Acceptance criteria", "Designs" ], "actions": [ "Build frontend, backend, APIs, database and integrations" ], "outputs": [ "Working features", "APIs", "Database changes", "Deployable build" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Inputs, activity and outputs transcribed from this workflow; gate and measures use the normalized phase reference.", "id": "12-5" }, { "label": "Testing / QA", "phase": 4, "box": [ 55.311, 10, 10.422, 53.2 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Build", "Requirements", "Acceptance criteria" ], "actions": [ "Validate quality and functionality" ], "outputs": [ "Test cases", "Bug reports", "QA sign-off" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Inputs, activity and outputs transcribed from this workflow; gate and measures use the normalized phase reference.", "id": "12-6" }, { "label": "DevOps / Release", "phase": 5, "box": [ 66.033, 10, 10.422, 53.2 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Codebase", "Release plan", "Environment needs" ], "actions": [ "Deploy, monitor and manage environments" ], "outputs": [ "Production deployment", "CI/CD", "Monitoring", "Alerts" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Inputs, activity and outputs transcribed from this workflow; gate and measures use the normalized phase reference.", "id": "12-7" }, { "label": "Customer Feedback", "phase": 6, "box": [ 76.756, 10, 10.422, 53.2 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Live product", "User behavior", "Support tickets" ], "actions": [ "Collect and analyze feedback" ], "outputs": [ "Feedback summary", "Pain points", "Improvement backlog" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Inputs, activity and outputs transcribed from this workflow; gate and measures use the normalized phase reference.", "id": "12-8" }, { "label": "Product Improvement", "phase": 6, "box": [ 87.478, 10, 10.422, 53.2 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Feedback summary", "Analytics", "Customer pain points" ], "actions": [ "Prioritize improvements" ], "outputs": [ "Updated roadmap", "Improved backlog", "Next release plan" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Inputs, activity and outputs transcribed from this workflow; gate and measures use the normalized phase reference.", "id": "12-9" }, { "label": "Sales / Go-to-Market", "phase": 5, "box": [ 4, 72.2, 91.6, 11.8 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Product positioning", "Target users", "Product value" ], "actions": [ "Promote, sell, demonstrate and launch product" ], "outputs": [ "Demo script", "Launch plan", "Sales collateral", "Customer objections" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "12-10" }, { "label": "Feedback loop", "phase": 6, "box": [ 18, 63.5, 64, 7.3 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Product analytics", "Customer feedback", "Support trends", "Experiment results" ], "actions": [ "Return customer feedback to product strategy and requirements" ], "outputs": [ "Refined strategy", "Updated requirements" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "12-11" } ] }, "navigationLabel": "Team Workflow" }, { "id": 13, "title": "SaaS Product Development Operating Model", "category": "Teams & Collaboration", "image": "/images/pdlc/13-operating-model.png", "tab": 3, "type": "original", "interactiveRegions": 104, "artwork": { "width": 1055, "height": 1491, "regions": [ { "label": "Idea", "phase": 0, "box": [ 3.0, 10.5, 6.45, 6.899999999999999 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Interview customers and stakeholders", "Synthesize evidence", "Frame the opportunity", "Validate problem assumptions" ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Problem statement", "Research findings", "Initial success measures" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "13-1" }, { "label": "Research", "phase": 0, "box": [ 9.75, 10.5, 6.45, 6.899999999999999 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Interview customers and stakeholders", "Synthesize evidence", "Frame the opportunity", "Validate problem assumptions" ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Problem statement", "Research findings", "Initial success measures" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "13-2" }, { "label": "Validation", "phase": 0, "box": [ 16.5, 10.5, 6.45, 6.899999999999999 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Interview customers and stakeholders", "Synthesize evidence", "Frame the opportunity", "Validate problem assumptions" ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Problem statement", "Research findings", "Initial success measures" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "13-3" }, { "label": "Strategy", "phase": 1, "box": [ 23.25, 10.5, 6.45, 6.899999999999999 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Define outcomes and MVP", "Prioritize requirements", "Assess feasibility and ROI", "Align stakeholders" ], "outputs": [ "Product strategy", "Prioritized roadmap", "MVP scope", "Success metrics" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "13-4" }, { "label": "MVP Scope", "phase": 1, "box": [ 30.0, 10.5, 6.45, 6.899999999999999 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Define outcomes and MVP", "Prioritize requirements", "Assess feasibility and ROI", "Align stakeholders" ], "outputs": [ "Product strategy", "Prioritized roadmap", "MVP scope", "Success metrics" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "13-5" }, { "label": "Requirements", "phase": 2, "box": [ 36.75, 10.5, 6.45, 6.899999999999999 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Prototype experiences", "Design integrations", "Test concepts", "Refine acceptance criteria" ], "outputs": [ "UX prototypes", "Technical design", "User stories", "Test scenarios" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "13-6" }, { "label": "Design", "phase": 2, "box": [ 43.5, 10.5, 6.45, 6.899999999999999 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Prototype experiences", "Design integrations", "Test concepts", "Refine acceptance criteria" ], "outputs": [ "UX prototypes", "Technical design", "User stories", "Test scenarios" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "13-7" }, { "label": "Architecture", "phase": 2, "box": [ 50.25, 10.5, 6.45, 6.899999999999999 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Prototype experiences", "Design integrations", "Test concepts", "Refine acceptance criteria" ], "outputs": [ "UX prototypes", "Technical design", "User stories", "Test scenarios" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "13-8" }, { "label": "Build", "phase": 3, "box": [ 57.0, 10.5, 6.45, 6.899999999999999 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Approved designs", "Prioritized backlog", "API contracts", "Acceptance criteria" ], "actions": [ "Build and integrate features", "Review increments", "Resolve trade-offs", "Instrument analytics" ], "outputs": [ "Working increments", "Source code", "Integrated services", "Updated documentation" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "13-9" }, { "label": "Test", "phase": 4, "box": [ 63.75, 10.5, 6.45, 6.899999999999999 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Release candidate", "Test plan", "Acceptance criteria", "Risk controls" ], "actions": [ "Run QA and UAT", "Validate analytics", "Review security", "Resolve critical defects" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence", "UAT results", "Release readiness", "Remediation list" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "13-10" }, { "label": "Launch", "phase": 5, "box": [ 70.5, 10.5, 6.45, 6.899999999999999 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Approved release", "Launch plan", "Training materials", "Operational runbooks" ], "actions": [ "Coordinate rollout", "Enable sales and support", "Monitor incidents", "Measure activation" ], "outputs": [ "Production release", "Release notes", "Launch communications", "Early adoption dashboard" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "13-11" }, { "label": "Feedback", "phase": 6, "box": [ 77.25, 10.5, 6.45, 6.899999999999999 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Product analytics", "Customer feedback", "Support trends", "Experiment results" ], "actions": [ "Analyze behavior", "Prioritize improvements", "Run experiments", "Update roadmap" ], "outputs": [ "Improvement backlog", "Experiment insights", "Updated roadmap", "Product health review" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "13-12" }, { "label": "Improve", "phase": 6, "box": [ 84.0, 10.5, 6.45, 6.899999999999999 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Product analytics", "Customer feedback", "Support trends", "Experiment results" ], "actions": [ "Analyze behavior", "Prioritize improvements", "Run experiments", "Update roadmap" ], "outputs": [ "Improvement backlog", "Experiment insights", "Updated roadmap", "Product health review" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "13-13" }, { "label": "Scale", "phase": 7, "box": [ 90.75, 10.5, 6.45, 6.899999999999999 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Growth signals", "Service health", "Unit economics", "Technical debt" ], "actions": [ "Plan capacity", "Optimize reliability", "Expand markets", "Review lifecycle investments" ], "outputs": [ "Scale roadmap", "Capacity plan", "Sustainability review", "Retirement plan if needed" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "13-14" }, { "label": "Founder / Strategy · Discover", "phase": 0, "box": [ 25.7, 24.0, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "set strategic boundaries" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "13-15" }, { "label": "Founder / Strategy · Define", "phase": 1, "box": [ 34.56, 24.0, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "review investment case" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "13-16" }, { "label": "Founder / Strategy · Design", "phase": 2, "box": [ 43.42, 24.0, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "review trade-offs" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "13-17" }, { "label": "Founder / Strategy · Build", "phase": 3, "box": [ 52.28, 24.0, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "resolve escalations" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "13-18" }, { "label": "Founder / Strategy · Validate", "phase": 4, "box": [ 61.14, 24.0, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "review business readiness" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "13-19" }, { "label": "Founder / Strategy · Launch", "phase": 5, "box": [ 70.0, 24.0, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "sponsor release" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "13-20" }, { "label": "Founder / Strategy · Improve", "phase": 6, "box": [ 78.86, 24.0, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "review performance" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "13-21" }, { "label": "Founder / Strategy · Scale / Maintain", "phase": 7, "box": [ 87.72, 24.0, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Strategy and investment priorities" ], "actions": [ "decide long-term investment" ], "outputs": [ "Strategic alignment and investment decisions" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Founder / Strategy", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "13-22" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · Discover", "phase": 0, "box": [ 25.7, 26.8, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "frame the opportunity" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "13-23" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · Define", "phase": 1, "box": [ 34.56, 26.8, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "define outcomes and scope" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "13-24" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · Design", "phase": 2, "box": [ 43.42, 26.8, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "refine product requirements" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "13-25" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · Build", "phase": 3, "box": [ 52.28, 26.8, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "prioritize and clarify backlog" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "13-26" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · Validate", "phase": 4, "box": [ 61.14, 26.8, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "review product acceptance" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "13-27" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · Launch", "phase": 5, "box": [ 70.0, 26.8, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "coordinate launch" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "13-28" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · Improve", "phase": 6, "box": [ 78.86, 26.8, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "prioritize improvements" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "13-29" }, { "label": "Product / PO / BA · Scale / Maintain", "phase": 7, "box": [ 87.72, 26.8, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "own lifecycle roadmap" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Product / PO / BA", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "13-30" }, { "label": "Design · Discover", "phase": 0, "box": [ 25.7, 29.6, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "map current journeys" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Design", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "13-31" }, { "label": "Design · Define", "phase": 1, "box": [ 34.56, 29.6, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "shape solution concepts" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Design", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "13-32" }, { "label": "Design · Design", "phase": 2, "box": [ 43.42, 29.6, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "design user flows" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Design", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "13-33" }, { "label": "Design · Build", "phase": 3, "box": [ 52.28, 29.6, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "review implementation fidelity" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Design", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "13-34" }, { "label": "Design · Validate", "phase": 4, "box": [ 61.14, 29.6, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "verify UX quality" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Design", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "13-35" }, { "label": "Design · Launch", "phase": 5, "box": [ 70.0, 29.6, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "address UX friction" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Design", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "13-36" }, { "label": "Design · Improve", "phase": 6, "box": [ 78.86, 29.6, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "refine experiences" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Design", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "13-37" }, { "label": "Design · Scale / Maintain", "phase": 7, "box": [ 87.72, 29.6, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "extend design system" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Design", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "13-38" }, { "label": "Engineering · Discover", "phase": 0, "box": [ 25.7, 32.4, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "assess feasibility" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Engineering", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "13-39" }, { "label": "Engineering · Define", "phase": 1, "box": [ 34.56, 32.4, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "estimate delivery" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Engineering", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "13-40" }, { "label": "Engineering · Design", "phase": 2, "box": [ 43.42, 32.4, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "review technical feasibility" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Engineering", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "13-41" }, { "label": "Engineering · Build", "phase": 3, "box": [ 52.28, 32.4, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "build features" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Engineering", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "13-42" }, { "label": "Engineering · Validate", "phase": 4, "box": [ 61.14, 32.4, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "fix defects" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Engineering", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "13-43" }, { "label": "Engineering · Launch", "phase": 5, "box": [ 70.0, 32.4, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "release features" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Engineering", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "13-44" }, { "label": "Engineering · Improve", "phase": 6, "box": [ 78.86, 32.4, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "deliver enhancements" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Engineering", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "13-45" }, { "label": "Engineering · Scale / Maintain", "phase": 7, "box": [ 87.72, 32.4, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "maintain and scale software" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Engineering", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "13-46" }, { "label": "QA · Discover", "phase": 0, "box": [ 25.7, 35.2, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "analyze quality pain points" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "QA", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "13-47" }, { "label": "QA · Define", "phase": 1, "box": [ 34.56, 35.2, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "define test strategy" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "QA", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "13-48" }, { "label": "QA · Design", "phase": 2, "box": [ 43.42, 35.2, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "design test coverage" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "QA", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "13-49" }, { "label": "QA · Build", "phase": 3, "box": [ 52.28, 35.2, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "test increments" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "QA", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "13-50" }, { "label": "QA · Validate", "phase": 4, "box": [ 61.14, 35.2, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "execute QA/UAT" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "QA", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "13-51" }, { "label": "QA · Launch", "phase": 5, "box": [ 70.0, 35.2, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "run smoke tests" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "QA", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "13-52" }, { "label": "QA · Improve", "phase": 6, "box": [ 78.86, 35.2, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "expand regression tests" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "QA", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "13-53" }, { "label": "QA · Scale / Maintain", "phase": 7, "box": [ 87.72, 35.2, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "sustain quality automation" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "QA", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "13-54" }, { "label": "DevOps · Discover", "phase": 0, "box": [ 25.7, 38.0, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "review operational constraints" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "DevOps", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "13-55" }, { "label": "DevOps · Define", "phase": 1, "box": [ 34.56, 38.0, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "define SLOs" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "DevOps", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "13-56" }, { "label": "DevOps · Design", "phase": 2, "box": [ 43.42, 38.0, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "plan environments" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "DevOps", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "13-57" }, { "label": "DevOps · Build", "phase": 3, "box": [ 52.28, 38.0, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "configure CI/CD" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "DevOps", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "13-58" }, { "label": "DevOps · Validate", "phase": 4, "box": [ 61.14, 38.0, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "test rollback" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "DevOps", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "13-59" }, { "label": "DevOps · Launch", "phase": 5, "box": [ 70.0, 38.0, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "operate rollout" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "DevOps", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "13-60" }, { "label": "DevOps · Improve", "phase": 6, "box": [ 78.86, 38.0, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "reduce incidents" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "DevOps", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "13-61" }, { "label": "DevOps · Scale / Maintain", "phase": 7, "box": [ 87.72, 38.0, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "plan capacity" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "DevOps", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "13-62" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · Discover", "phase": 0, "box": [ 25.7, 40.8, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "identify support themes" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "13-63" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · Define", "phase": 1, "box": [ 34.56, 40.8, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "define onboarding needs" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "13-64" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · Design", "phase": 2, "box": [ 43.42, 40.8, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "design support journeys" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "13-65" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · Build", "phase": 3, "box": [ 52.28, 40.8, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "draft help content" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "13-66" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · Validate", "phase": 4, "box": [ 61.14, 40.8, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "test onboarding" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "13-67" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · Launch", "phase": 5, "box": [ 70.0, 40.8, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "onboard customers" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "13-68" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · Improve", "phase": 6, "box": [ 78.86, 40.8, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "improve adoption" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "13-69" }, { "label": "Customer Success / Support · Scale / Maintain", "phase": 7, "box": [ 87.72, 40.8, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "manage retention" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Customer Success / Support", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "13-70" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · Discover", "phase": 0, "box": [ 25.7, 43.599999999999994, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "analyze market segments" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "13-71" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · Define", "phase": 1, "box": [ 34.56, 43.599999999999994, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "define positioning" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "13-72" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · Design", "phase": 2, "box": [ 43.42, 43.599999999999994, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "review messaging" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "sourceInvolvement": "Minimal involvement", "id": "13-73" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · Build", "phase": 3, "box": [ 52.28, 43.599999999999994, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "prepare launch assets" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "13-74" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · Validate", "phase": 4, "box": [ 61.14, 43.599999999999994, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "verify claims" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "13-75" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · Launch", "phase": 5, "box": [ 70.0, 43.599999999999994, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "run campaigns" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "13-76" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · Improve", "phase": 6, "box": [ 78.86, 43.599999999999994, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "optimize messaging" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "sourceInvolvement": "Contributor", "id": "13-77" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing · Scale / Maintain", "phase": 7, "box": [ 87.72, 43.599999999999994, 8.86, 2.8 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "support expansion" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "sourceInvolvement": "Primary owner", "id": "13-78" }, { "label": "Discover · Matrix phase", "phase": 0, "box": [ 25.7, 21.8, 8.625, 2.1999999999999993 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Interview customers and stakeholders", "Synthesize evidence", "Frame the opportunity", "Validate problem assumptions" ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Problem statement", "Research findings", "Initial success measures" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "13-79" }, { "label": "Define · Matrix phase", "phase": 1, "box": [ 34.625, 21.8, 8.625, 2.1999999999999993 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Define outcomes and MVP", "Prioritize requirements", "Assess feasibility and ROI", "Align stakeholders" ], "outputs": [ "Product strategy", "Prioritized roadmap", "MVP scope", "Success metrics" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "13-80" }, { "label": "Design · Matrix phase", "phase": 2, "box": [ 43.55, 21.8, 8.625, 2.1999999999999993 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Prototype experiences", "Design integrations", "Test concepts", "Refine acceptance criteria" ], "outputs": [ "UX prototypes", "Technical design", "User stories", "Test scenarios" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "13-81" }, { "label": "Build · Matrix phase", "phase": 3, "box": [ 52.475, 21.8, 8.625, 2.1999999999999993 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Approved designs", "Prioritized backlog", "API contracts", "Acceptance criteria" ], "actions": [ "Build and integrate features", "Review increments", "Resolve trade-offs", "Instrument analytics" ], "outputs": [ "Working increments", "Source code", "Integrated services", "Updated documentation" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "13-82" }, { "label": "Validate · Matrix phase", "phase": 4, "box": [ 61.4, 21.8, 8.625, 2.1999999999999993 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Release candidate", "Test plan", "Acceptance criteria", "Risk controls" ], "actions": [ "Run QA and UAT", "Validate analytics", "Review security", "Resolve critical defects" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence", "UAT results", "Release readiness", "Remediation list" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "13-83" }, { "label": "Launch · Matrix phase", "phase": 5, "box": [ 70.325, 21.8, 8.625, 2.1999999999999993 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Approved release", "Launch plan", "Training materials", "Operational runbooks" ], "actions": [ "Coordinate rollout", "Enable sales and support", "Monitor incidents", "Measure activation" ], "outputs": [ "Production release", "Release notes", "Launch communications", "Early adoption dashboard" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "13-84" }, { "label": "Improve · Matrix phase", "phase": 6, "box": [ 79.25, 21.8, 8.625, 2.1999999999999993 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Product analytics", "Customer feedback", "Support trends", "Experiment results" ], "actions": [ "Analyze behavior", "Prioritize improvements", "Run experiments", "Update roadmap" ], "outputs": [ "Improvement backlog", "Experiment insights", "Updated roadmap", "Product health review" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "13-85" }, { "label": "Scale / Maintain · Matrix phase", "phase": 7, "box": [ 88.175, 21.8, 8.625, 2.1999999999999993 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Growth signals", "Service health", "Unit economics", "Technical debt" ], "actions": [ "Plan capacity", "Optimize reliability", "Expand markets", "Review lifecycle investments" ], "outputs": [ "Scale roadmap", "Capacity plan", "Sustainability review", "Retirement plan if needed" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "13-86" }, { "label": "Vision", "phase": 1, "box": [ 3.2, 55.4, 10.122, 12.100000000000001 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Define outcomes and MVP", "Prioritize requirements", "Assess feasibility and ROI", "Align stakeholders" ], "outputs": [ "Product strategy", "Prioritized roadmap", "MVP scope", "Success metrics" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "13-87" }, { "label": "Roadmap", "phase": 1, "box": [ 13.622, 55.4, 10.122, 12.100000000000001 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Define outcomes and MVP", "Prioritize requirements", "Assess feasibility and ROI", "Align stakeholders" ], "outputs": [ "Product strategy", "Prioritized roadmap", "MVP scope", "Success metrics" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "13-88" }, { "label": "Requirements", "phase": 2, "box": [ 24.044, 55.4, 10.122, 12.100000000000001 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Prototype experiences", "Design integrations", "Test concepts", "Refine acceptance criteria" ], "outputs": [ "UX prototypes", "Technical design", "User stories", "Test scenarios" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "13-89" }, { "label": "Designs", "phase": 2, "box": [ 34.467, 55.4, 10.122, 12.100000000000001 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Prototype experiences", "Design integrations", "Test concepts", "Refine acceptance criteria" ], "outputs": [ "UX prototypes", "Technical design", "User stories", "Test scenarios" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "13-90" }, { "label": "Working Product", "phase": 3, "box": [ 44.889, 55.4, 10.122, 12.100000000000001 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Approved designs", "Prioritized backlog", "API contracts", "Acceptance criteria" ], "actions": [ "Build and integrate features", "Review increments", "Resolve trade-offs", "Instrument analytics" ], "outputs": [ "Working increments", "Source code", "Integrated services", "Updated documentation" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "13-91" }, { "label": "QA Sign-off", "phase": 4, "box": [ 55.311, 55.4, 10.122, 12.100000000000001 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Release candidate", "Test plan", "Acceptance criteria", "Risk controls" ], "actions": [ "Run QA and UAT", "Validate analytics", "Review security", "Resolve critical defects" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence", "UAT results", "Release readiness", "Remediation list" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "13-92" }, { "label": "Release", "phase": 5, "box": [ 65.733, 55.4, 10.122, 12.100000000000001 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Approved release", "Launch plan", "Training materials", "Operational runbooks" ], "actions": [ "Coordinate rollout", "Enable sales and support", "Monitor incidents", "Measure activation" ], "outputs": [ "Production release", "Release notes", "Launch communications", "Early adoption dashboard" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "13-93" }, { "label": "Feedback", "phase": 6, "box": [ 76.156, 55.4, 10.122, 12.100000000000001 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Product analytics", "Customer feedback", "Support trends", "Experiment results" ], "actions": [ "Analyze behavior", "Prioritize improvements", "Run experiments", "Update roadmap" ], "outputs": [ "Improvement backlog", "Experiment insights", "Updated roadmap", "Product health review" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "13-94" }, { "label": "Improvements", "phase": 6, "box": [ 86.578, 55.4, 10.122, 12.100000000000001 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Product analytics", "Customer feedback", "Support trends", "Experiment results" ], "actions": [ "Analyze behavior", "Prioritize improvements", "Run experiments", "Update roadmap" ], "outputs": [ "Improvement backlog", "Experiment insights", "Updated roadmap", "Product health review" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "13-95" }, { "label": "Product", "phase": 5, "box": [ 3.2, 72.2, 19, 10.4 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Business objectives and customer evidence" ], "actions": [ "Lead product direction and decisions" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Role names transcribed from this artwork; supporting contribution uses the team reference.", "team": "Product", "roles": [ "Founder", "Product Manager", "Product Owner", "Business Analyst" ], "id": "13-96" }, { "label": "Design", "phase": 5, "box": [ 23.5, 72.2, 19.8, 10.4 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "User journeys and design requirements" ], "actions": [ "Design and refine user experiences" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Role names transcribed from this artwork; supporting contribution uses the team reference.", "team": "Design", "roles": [ "UX Researcher", "UX Designer", "UI Designer", "Product Designer" ], "id": "13-97" }, { "label": "Engineering", "phase": 5, "box": [ 44.7, 72.2, 24.3, 10.4 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Backlog and technical constraints" ], "actions": [ "Implement and integrate the solution" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Role names transcribed from this artwork; supporting contribution uses the team reference.", "team": "Engineering", "roles": [ "Frontend Developer", "Backend Developer", "Full-stack Developer", "Technical Lead" ], "id": "13-98" }, { "label": "QA", "phase": 5, "box": [ 70.4, 72.2, 25.6, 10.4 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Requirements and test evidence" ], "actions": [ "Verify quality and acceptance criteria" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Role names transcribed from this artwork; supporting contribution uses the team reference.", "team": "QA", "roles": [ "QA Engineer", "Manual Tester", "Automation QA", "UAT Coordinator" ], "id": "13-99" }, { "label": "DevOps", "phase": 5, "box": [ 3.2, 83.4, 19, 11.8 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Infrastructure and service metrics" ], "actions": [ "Ensure deployment and operational reliability" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Role names transcribed from this artwork; supporting contribution uses the team reference.", "team": "DevOps", "roles": [ "DevOps Engineer", "Cloud Engineer", "SRE", "Release Manager" ], "id": "13-100" }, { "label": "Customer Success", "phase": 5, "box": [ 23.5, 83.4, 19.8, 11.8 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback and support trends" ], "actions": [ "Enable adoption and support customers" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Role names transcribed from this artwork; supporting contribution uses the team reference.", "team": "Customer Success", "roles": [ "Customer Success Manager", "Support Specialist", "Customer Researcher" ], "id": "13-101" }, { "label": "GTM / Sales & Marketing", "phase": 5, "box": [ 44.7, 83.4, 24.3, 11.8 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Market and positioning evidence" ], "actions": [ "Shape positioning and market communications" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Role names transcribed from this artwork; supporting contribution uses the team reference.", "team": "GTM / Sales & Marketing", "roles": [ "Sales Representative", "Product Marketing Manager", "Marketing Specialist", "Pre-Sales" ], "id": "13-102" }, { "label": "Data / Analytics", "phase": 5, "box": [ 70.4, 83.4, 25.6, 5.4 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Usage data and measurement plan" ], "actions": [ "Measure product behavior and outcomes" ], "outputs": [ "Analytics and product insights" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Role names transcribed from this artwork; supporting contribution uses the team reference.", "team": "Data / Analytics", "roles": [ "Data Analyst", "Product Analyst", "BI Analyst" ], "id": "13-103" }, { "label": "Security / Compliance", "phase": 5, "box": [ 70.4, 89.4, 25.6, 6.2 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Data flows and risk obligations" ], "actions": [ "Manage security, privacy and compliance risk" ], "outputs": [ "Risk controls and compliance evidence" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Role names transcribed from this artwork; supporting contribution uses the team reference.", "team": "Security / Compliance", "roles": [ "Security Engineer", "Compliance Analyst", "Risk Manager" ], "id": "13-104" } ] }, "navigationLabel": "Operating Model" } ] }, { "name": "Executive Governance", "diagramCount": 1, "diagrams": [ { "id": 14, "title": "PDLC Executive Dashboard", "category": "Executive Governance", "image": "/images/pdlc/14-executive-dashboard.png", "tab": 5, "type": "original", "interactiveRegions": 51, "artwork": { "width": 1491, "height": 1055, "regions": [ { "label": "Discover", "phase": 0, "box": [ 3.0, 13.7, 11.487, 11.100000000000001 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Interview customers and stakeholders", "Synthesize evidence", "Frame the opportunity", "Validate problem assumptions" ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Problem statement", "Research findings", "Initial success measures" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "14-1" }, { "label": "Define", "phase": 1, "box": [ 14.787, 13.7, 11.487, 11.100000000000001 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Define outcomes and MVP", "Prioritize requirements", "Assess feasibility and ROI", "Align stakeholders" ], "outputs": [ "Product strategy", "Prioritized roadmap", "MVP scope", "Success metrics" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "14-2" }, { "label": "Design", "phase": 2, "box": [ 26.575, 13.7, 11.487, 11.100000000000001 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Prototype experiences", "Design integrations", "Test concepts", "Refine acceptance criteria" ], "outputs": [ "UX prototypes", "Technical design", "User stories", "Test scenarios" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "14-3" }, { "label": "Build", "phase": 3, "box": [ 38.362, 13.7, 11.487, 11.100000000000001 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Approved designs", "Prioritized backlog", "API contracts", "Acceptance criteria" ], "actions": [ "Build and integrate features", "Review increments", "Resolve trade-offs", "Instrument analytics" ], "outputs": [ "Working increments", "Source code", "Integrated services", "Updated documentation" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "14-4" }, { "label": "Validate", "phase": 4, "box": [ 50.15, 13.7, 11.487, 11.100000000000001 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Release candidate", "Test plan", "Acceptance criteria", "Risk controls" ], "actions": [ "Run QA and UAT", "Validate analytics", "Review security", "Resolve critical defects" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence", "UAT results", "Release readiness", "Remediation list" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "14-5" }, { "label": "Launch", "phase": 5, "box": [ 61.938, 13.7, 11.487, 11.100000000000001 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Approved release", "Launch plan", "Training materials", "Operational runbooks" ], "actions": [ "Coordinate rollout", "Enable sales and support", "Monitor incidents", "Measure activation" ], "outputs": [ "Production release", "Release notes", "Launch communications", "Early adoption dashboard" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "14-6" }, { "label": "Improve", "phase": 6, "box": [ 73.725, 13.7, 11.487, 11.100000000000001 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Product analytics", "Customer feedback", "Support trends", "Experiment results" ], "actions": [ "Analyze behavior", "Prioritize improvements", "Run experiments", "Update roadmap" ], "outputs": [ "Improvement backlog", "Experiment insights", "Updated roadmap", "Product health review" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "14-7" }, { "label": "Scale / Maintain", "phase": 7, "box": [ 85.513, 13.7, 11.487, 11.100000000000001 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Growth signals", "Service health", "Unit economics", "Technical debt" ], "actions": [ "Plan capacity", "Optimize reliability", "Expand markets", "Review lifecycle investments" ], "outputs": [ "Scale roadmap", "Capacity plan", "Sustainability review", "Retirement plan if needed" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "14-8" }, { "label": "Discover · PM responsibility", "phase": 0, "box": [ 2.2, 31.4, 27.3, 5.04 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Research users, market and pain points. Validate the opportunity." ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Research report", "Personas", "Pain points" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "14-9" }, { "label": "Define · PM responsibility", "phase": 1, "box": [ 2.2, 36.44, 27.3, 5.04 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Define product strategy, roadmap, feasibility and MVP scope." ], "outputs": [ "Product vision", "Roadmap", "Business case", "Success metrics", "MVP scope" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "14-10" }, { "label": "Design · PM responsibility", "phase": 2, "box": [ 2.2, 41.48, 27.3, 5.04 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Create requirements, review UX and align with technical architecture." ], "outputs": [ "PRD", "User stories", "Workflows", "Wireframes", "Prototype", "UI screens" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "14-11" }, { "label": "Build · PM responsibility", "phase": 3, "box": [ 2.2, 46.519999999999996, 27.3, 5.04 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Approved designs", "Prioritized backlog", "API contracts", "Acceptance criteria" ], "actions": [ "Clarify requirements, manage trade-offs and support engineering delivery." ], "outputs": [ "Working software", "Code", "Integrations", "Technical documentation" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "14-12" }, { "label": "Validate · PM responsibility", "phase": 4, "box": [ 2.2, 51.56, 27.3, 5.04 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Release candidate", "Test plan", "Acceptance criteria", "Risk controls" ], "actions": [ "Validate acceptance criteria and coordinate QA and UAT." ], "outputs": [ "Test cases", "Bug reports", "QA sign-off", "UAT approval" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "14-13" }, { "label": "Launch · PM responsibility", "phase": 5, "box": [ 2.2, 56.599999999999994, 27.3, 5.04 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Approved release", "Launch plan", "Training materials", "Operational runbooks" ], "actions": [ "Prepare launch, release notes, onboarding and go-to-market support." ], "outputs": [ "Release notes", "Launch plan", "Training content", "Support guide" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "14-14" }, { "label": "Improve · PM responsibility", "phase": 6, "box": [ 2.2, 61.64, 27.3, 5.04 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Product analytics", "Customer feedback", "Support trends", "Experiment results" ], "actions": [ "Gather feedback, analyze data and prioritize improvements." ], "outputs": [ "Analytics dashboard", "Feedback report", "Improvement backlog" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "14-15" }, { "label": "Scale / Maintain · PM responsibility", "phase": 7, "box": [ 2.2, 66.68, 27.3, 5.04 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Growth signals", "Service health", "Unit economics", "Technical debt" ], "actions": [ "Expand roadmap, monitor product health and manage lifecycle decisions." ], "outputs": [ "Growth roadmap", "Scalability plan", "Monitoring dashboard", "Sunset plan" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "14-16" }, { "label": "Discover · Key deliverables", "phase": 0, "box": [ 31.4, 32.2, 7.5, 19 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Interview customers and stakeholders", "Synthesize evidence", "Frame the opportunity", "Validate problem assumptions" ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Research report", "Personas", "Pain points" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "14-17" }, { "label": "Discover · Example metrics", "phase": 0, "box": [ 65.1, 32.2, 7.8, 19 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Interview customers and stakeholders", "Synthesize evidence", "Frame the opportunity", "Validate problem assumptions" ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Problem statement", "Research findings", "Initial success measures" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Illustrative values printed in the original artwork, not live portfolio performance.", "exampleMetrics": [ "24 interviews conducted", "78% problem frequency" ], "id": "14-18" }, { "label": "Define · Key deliverables", "phase": 1, "box": [ 39.45, 32.2, 7.5, 19 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Define outcomes and MVP", "Prioritize requirements", "Assess feasibility and ROI", "Align stakeholders" ], "outputs": [ "Product vision", "Roadmap", "Business case", "Success metrics", "MVP scope" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "14-19" }, { "label": "Define · Example metrics", "phase": 1, "box": [ 73.5, 32.2, 7.8, 19 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Define outcomes and MVP", "Prioritize requirements", "Assess feasibility and ROI", "Align stakeholders" ], "outputs": [ "Product strategy", "Prioritized roadmap", "MVP scope", "Success metrics" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Illustrative values printed in the original artwork, not live portfolio performance.", "exampleMetrics": [ "8.7 / 10 prioritization score", "82% MVP scope confidence" ], "id": "14-20" }, { "label": "Design · Key deliverables", "phase": 2, "box": [ 47.5, 32.2, 7.5, 19 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Prototype experiences", "Design integrations", "Test concepts", "Refine acceptance criteria" ], "outputs": [ "PRD", "User stories", "Workflows", "Wireframes", "Prototype", "UI screens" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "14-21" }, { "label": "Design · Example metrics", "phase": 2, "box": [ 81.89999999999999, 32.2, 7.8, 19 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Prototype experiences", "Design integrations", "Test concepts", "Refine acceptance criteria" ], "outputs": [ "UX prototypes", "Technical design", "User stories", "Test scenarios" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Illustrative values printed in the original artwork, not live portfolio performance.", "exampleMetrics": [ "92% design completion", "4.6 / 5 usability score" ], "id": "14-22" }, { "label": "Build · Key deliverables", "phase": 3, "box": [ 55.55, 32.2, 7.5, 19 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Approved designs", "Prioritized backlog", "API contracts", "Acceptance criteria" ], "actions": [ "Build and integrate features", "Review increments", "Resolve trade-offs", "Instrument analytics" ], "outputs": [ "Working software", "Code", "Integrations", "Technical documentation" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "14-23" }, { "label": "Build · Example metrics", "phase": 3, "box": [ 90.3, 32.2, 7.8, 19 ], "question": "How do we deliver a reliable product?", "inputs": [ "Approved designs", "Prioritized backlog", "API contracts", "Acceptance criteria" ], "actions": [ "Build and integrate features", "Review increments", "Resolve trade-offs", "Instrument analytics" ], "outputs": [ "Working increments", "Source code", "Integrated services", "Updated documentation" ], "gate": "Does the increment meet agreed acceptance criteria?", "metrics": [ "Cycle time", "Defect trends", "Delivery predictability" ], "provenance": "Illustrative values printed in the original artwork, not live portfolio performance.", "exampleMetrics": [ "42 sprint velocity (points)", "88% feature completion" ], "id": "14-24" }, { "label": "Validate · Key deliverables", "phase": 4, "box": [ 31.4, 52.2, 7.5, 19 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Release candidate", "Test plan", "Acceptance criteria", "Risk controls" ], "actions": [ "Run QA and UAT", "Validate analytics", "Review security", "Resolve critical defects" ], "outputs": [ "Test cases", "Bug reports", "QA sign-off", "UAT approval" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "14-25" }, { "label": "Validate · Example metrics", "phase": 4, "box": [ 65.1, 52.2, 7.8, 19 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Release candidate", "Test plan", "Acceptance criteria", "Risk controls" ], "actions": [ "Run QA and UAT", "Validate analytics", "Review security", "Resolve critical defects" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence", "UAT results", "Release readiness", "Remediation list" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Illustrative values printed in the original artwork, not live portfolio performance.", "exampleMetrics": [ "2.1% defect leakage", "96% test pass rate" ], "id": "14-26" }, { "label": "Launch · Key deliverables", "phase": 5, "box": [ 39.45, 52.2, 7.5, 19 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Approved release", "Launch plan", "Training materials", "Operational runbooks" ], "actions": [ "Coordinate rollout", "Enable sales and support", "Monitor incidents", "Measure activation" ], "outputs": [ "Release notes", "Launch plan", "Training content", "Support guide" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "14-27" }, { "label": "Launch · Example metrics", "phase": 5, "box": [ 73.5, 52.2, 7.8, 19 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Approved release", "Launch plan", "Training materials", "Operational runbooks" ], "actions": [ "Coordinate rollout", "Enable sales and support", "Monitor incidents", "Measure activation" ], "outputs": [ "Production release", "Release notes", "Launch communications", "Early adoption dashboard" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Illustrative values printed in the original artwork, not live portfolio performance.", "exampleMetrics": [ "95% release readiness", "61% adoption rate" ], "id": "14-28" }, { "label": "Improve · Key deliverables", "phase": 6, "box": [ 47.5, 52.2, 7.5, 19 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Product analytics", "Customer feedback", "Support trends", "Experiment results" ], "actions": [ "Analyze behavior", "Prioritize improvements", "Run experiments", "Update roadmap" ], "outputs": [ "Analytics dashboard", "Feedback report", "Improvement backlog" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "14-29" }, { "label": "Improve · Example metrics", "phase": 6, "box": [ 81.89999999999999, 52.2, 7.8, 19 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Product analytics", "Customer feedback", "Support trends", "Experiment results" ], "actions": [ "Analyze behavior", "Prioritize improvements", "Run experiments", "Update roadmap" ], "outputs": [ "Improvement backlog", "Experiment insights", "Updated roadmap", "Product health review" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Illustrative values printed in the original artwork, not live portfolio performance.", "exampleMetrics": [ "68% 30-day retention", "42 NPS", "3.9 / 5 engagement score" ], "id": "14-30" }, { "label": "Scale / Maintain · Key deliverables", "phase": 7, "box": [ 55.55, 52.2, 7.5, 19 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Growth signals", "Service health", "Unit economics", "Technical debt" ], "actions": [ "Plan capacity", "Optimize reliability", "Expand markets", "Review lifecycle investments" ], "outputs": [ "Growth roadmap", "Scalability plan", "Monitoring dashboard", "Sunset plan" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "14-31" }, { "label": "Scale / Maintain · Example metrics", "phase": 7, "box": [ 90.3, 52.2, 7.8, 19 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Growth signals", "Service health", "Unit economics", "Technical debt" ], "actions": [ "Plan capacity", "Optimize reliability", "Expand markets", "Review lifecycle investments" ], "outputs": [ "Scale roadmap", "Capacity plan", "Sustainability review", "Retirement plan if needed" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Illustrative values printed in the original artwork, not live portfolio performance.", "exampleMetrics": [ "+28% ARR growth (YoY)", "99.9% uptime", "1.8% churn rate", "<2 hrs support SLA" ], "id": "14-32" }, { "label": "Problem Validated", "phase": 0, "box": [ 2.0, 79.3, 5.6, 16.400000000000006 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Interview customers and stakeholders", "Synthesize evidence", "Frame the opportunity", "Validate problem assumptions" ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Problem statement", "Research findings", "Initial success measures" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "14-33" }, { "label": "Scope Approved", "phase": 1, "box": [ 7.9, 79.3, 5.6, 16.400000000000006 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Define outcomes and MVP", "Prioritize requirements", "Assess feasibility and ROI", "Align stakeholders" ], "outputs": [ "Product strategy", "Prioritized roadmap", "MVP scope", "Success metrics" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "14-34" }, { "label": "Design Approved", "phase": 2, "box": [ 13.8, 79.3, 5.6, 16.400000000000006 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Prototype experiences", "Design integrations", "Test concepts", "Refine acceptance criteria" ], "outputs": [ "UX prototypes", "Technical design", "User stories", "Test scenarios" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "14-35" }, { "label": "Release Ready", "phase": 5, "box": [ 19.7, 79.3, 5.6, 16.400000000000006 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Approved release", "Launch plan", "Training materials", "Operational runbooks" ], "actions": [ "Coordinate rollout", "Enable sales and support", "Monitor incidents", "Measure activation" ], "outputs": [ "Production release", "Release notes", "Launch communications", "Early adoption dashboard" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "14-36" }, { "label": "Scale Approved", "phase": 7, "box": [ 25.6, 79.3, 5.6, 16.400000000000006 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Growth signals", "Service health", "Unit economics", "Technical debt" ], "actions": [ "Plan capacity", "Optimize reliability", "Expand markets", "Review lifecycle investments" ], "outputs": [ "Scale roadmap", "Capacity plan", "Sustainability review", "Retirement plan if needed" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "14-37" }, { "label": "Product", "phase": 5, "box": [ 54.3, 79.5, 10.3, 3.7 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Approved release", "Launch plan", "Training materials", "Operational runbooks" ], "actions": [ "Lead product direction and decisions" ], "outputs": [ "Product decisions and prioritized artifacts" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Product", "id": "14-38" }, { "label": "Design", "phase": 5, "box": [ 54.3, 83.2, 10.3, 3.7 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Approved release", "Launch plan", "Training materials", "Operational runbooks" ], "actions": [ "Design and refine user experiences" ], "outputs": [ "Experience designs and recommendations" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Design", "id": "14-39" }, { "label": "Engineering", "phase": 5, "box": [ 54.3, 86.9, 10.3, 3.7 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Approved release", "Launch plan", "Training materials", "Operational runbooks" ], "actions": [ "Implement and integrate the solution" ], "outputs": [ "Working features and technical fixes" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Engineering", "id": "14-40" }, { "label": "QA", "phase": 5, "box": [ 54.3, 90.6, 10.3, 3.7 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Approved release", "Launch plan", "Training materials", "Operational runbooks" ], "actions": [ "Verify quality and acceptance criteria" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence and quality findings" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "QA", "id": "14-41" }, { "label": "DevOps", "phase": 5, "box": [ 64.6, 79.5, 10.3, 3.7 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Approved release", "Launch plan", "Training materials", "Operational runbooks" ], "actions": [ "Ensure deployment and operational reliability" ], "outputs": [ "Reliable deployments and operational reports" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "DevOps", "id": "14-42" }, { "label": "Sales / Marketing", "phase": 5, "box": [ 64.6, 83.2, 10.3, 3.7 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Approved release", "Launch plan", "Training materials", "Operational runbooks" ], "actions": [ "Shape positioning and market communications" ], "outputs": [ "Positioning and campaign assets" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Sales / Marketing", "id": "14-43" }, { "label": "Customer Success", "phase": 5, "box": [ 64.6, 86.9, 10.3, 3.7 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Approved release", "Launch plan", "Training materials", "Operational runbooks" ], "actions": [ "Enable adoption and support customers" ], "outputs": [ "Adoption and support improvements" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Customer Success", "id": "14-44" }, { "label": "Data / Analytics", "phase": 5, "box": [ 64.6, 90.6, 10.3, 3.7 ], "question": "How do we launch and enable adoption?", "inputs": [ "Approved release", "Launch plan", "Training materials", "Operational runbooks" ], "actions": [ "Measure product behavior and outcomes" ], "outputs": [ "Analytics and product insights" ], "gate": "Is the launch stable and meeting initial expectations?", "metrics": [ "Activation", "Availability", "Incident rate" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "team": "Data / Analytics", "id": "14-45" }, { "label": "What problem?", "phase": 0, "box": [ 33, 79.2, 18.2, 3.6 ], "question": "What customer problem is worth solving?", "inputs": [ "Customer feedback", "Market analysis", "Business objectives", "Product usage data" ], "actions": [ "Interview customers and stakeholders", "Synthesize evidence", "Frame the opportunity", "Validate problem assumptions" ], "outputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Problem statement", "Research findings", "Initial success measures" ], "gate": "Is the opportunity sufficiently validated?", "metrics": [ "Problem frequency", "Evidence quality", "Addressable opportunity" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "14-46" }, { "label": "What should we build?", "phase": 1, "box": [ 33, 82.8, 18.2, 3.6 ], "question": "What should we build, and why now?", "inputs": [ "Opportunity brief", "Strategic goals", "Research findings", "Constraints" ], "actions": [ "Define outcomes and MVP", "Prioritize requirements", "Assess feasibility and ROI", "Align stakeholders" ], "outputs": [ "Product strategy", "Prioritized roadmap", "MVP scope", "Success metrics" ], "gate": "Is the proposed investment and scope justified?", "metrics": [ "Expected value", "Feasibility", "Priority confidence" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "14-47" }, { "label": "How should it work?", "phase": 2, "box": [ 33, 86.4, 18.2, 3.6 ], "question": "How should the solution work?", "inputs": [ "PRD and MVP scope", "User journeys", "Architecture constraints", "Design system" ], "actions": [ "Prototype experiences", "Design integrations", "Test concepts", "Refine acceptance criteria" ], "outputs": [ "UX prototypes", "Technical design", "User stories", "Test scenarios" ], "gate": "Is the solution usable, feasible, and ready to build?", "metrics": [ "Task success", "Usability findings", "Technical risk" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "14-48" }, { "label": "Does it solve the problem?", "phase": 4, "box": [ 33, 90.0, 18.2, 3.6 ], "question": "Does the product solve the problem safely and reliably?", "inputs": [ "Release candidate", "Test plan", "Acceptance criteria", "Risk controls" ], "actions": [ "Run QA and UAT", "Validate analytics", "Review security", "Resolve critical defects" ], "outputs": [ "Test evidence", "UAT results", "Release readiness", "Remediation list" ], "gate": "Are quality, risk, and acceptance criteria met?", "metrics": [ "Critical defects", "Test coverage", "Task success" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "14-49" }, { "label": "How do we grow it?", "phase": 7, "box": [ 33, 93.60000000000001, 18.2, 3.6 ], "question": "How do we sustain and grow product value?", "inputs": [ "Growth signals", "Service health", "Unit economics", "Technical debt" ], "actions": [ "Plan capacity", "Optimize reliability", "Expand markets", "Review lifecycle investments" ], "outputs": [ "Scale roadmap", "Capacity plan", "Sustainability review", "Retirement plan if needed" ], "gate": "Should we expand, maintain, modernize, or retire?", "metrics": [ "Reliability", "Unit economics", "Growth", "Retention" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "14-50" }, { "label": "Executive insight", "phase": 6, "box": [ 76.8, 79.3, 21.2, 16.4 ], "question": "What can we learn and improve?", "inputs": [ "Product analytics", "Customer feedback", "Support trends", "Experiment results" ], "actions": [ "Turn customer problems into business outcomes through structured discovery, prioritization, delivery, launch, measurement and iteration." ], "outputs": [ "Improvement backlog", "Experiment insights", "Updated roadmap", "Product health review" ], "gate": "Are improvements delivering measurable value?", "metrics": [ "Retention", "Conversion", "Satisfaction" ], "provenance": "Normalized phase reference; original stage label retained.", "id": "14-51" } ] }, "navigationLabel": "Executive Dashboard" } ] } ], "additionalExplorerViews": [ { "id": 15, "title": "Governance and Decision Gates", "category": "Executive Governance", "image": null, "tab": 6, "type": "interactive", "navigationLabel": "Decision Gates" }, { "id": 16, "title": "Framework-to-PDLC Phase Mapping", "category": "Executive Governance", "image": null, "tab": 7, "type": "interactive", "navigationLabel": "Framework Map" } ] }